|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On Apr 8, 9:45 pm, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote: On 8 Apr 2007 18:30:19 -0700, " wrote: On Apr 8, 1:52 pm, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: Dumbasses - dumbass, the reason hoste lost was because he is a bitch. last year he screwed over his team to work for boonen and used his second place to leverage a higher paying job on his old team. the year before he sat on wesemann until wesemann squeezed his balls. he sat on ballan, and of course i don't think you should pull through because someone wants you too, his bitchmade body language makes me want to punch him in the head. * he's not a winner, which is why he can be strong and still lose. yeah, i'm glad ballan won. *(also he may have sprinted for the wrong line) Ballan was stronger, and maybe Hoste went too early. I like this quote from Hoste's teammate Björn Leukemans (inhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/apr07/apr09news) "Hoste is like that; if he knows that he's faster, then he thinks he's certain of the win" -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visithttp://www.jt10000.com ****************************- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hoste started his sprint 25 meters too early. Andre |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
Jeff Jones wrote:
It's definitely uphill (ridden it a few times) and I would imagine it's fairly easy to misjudge. Hoste should have known better, having twice finished second in a sprint there prior to today. He's practising so he can become the next Zabel. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On 8 apr, 19:52, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote:
Dumbasses - In a 2 up sprint, the basic principle is simple: go from where you know you can accelerate all the way to the line. If you're still accelerating in the last meters, it's difficult to come around you because the guy behind has to match your acceleration and put something on top of it. By contrast, if the lead rider isn't accelerating anymore, then all the rear rider has to do is accelerate into the slipstream, then come out into the wind and go past. Although the basic principle of accelerating all the way to the line is simple, calculating when to go is far more complicated. It depends upon the abilities of the riders in question, how tired they are, how fast they are going at the moment vs. how far away they are from the line at the moment. Lotta variables. Hoste went from 150 meters today. Normally that's not too far out. Fly in the ointment though. Look at this photo: No he didn't. He went from more than 200m. If he waited until 150m, there was no way Ballan could return. Ballan chose a much bigger gear than Hoste. That's why Hoste's acceleration made Ballan lose an entire bike length. With the slightly uphill finish, it would have been impossible for Ballan to get his gear going and to close that gap. Hoste chose the right gear, did a very explosive sprint but too early. Kenny |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Ballan won
Ballan made the move, did more of the work and was stronger in the
break, got sat on for most of the last K, and still one. Perhaps Hoste would have won with a better timed sprint, but he didn't, and the best man won. Wayne |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On Apr 9, 8:53 am, "Kenny" wrote:
Ballan chose a much bigger gear than Hoste. That's why Hoste's acceleration made Ballan lose an entire bike length. With the slightly uphill finish, it would have been impossible for Ballan to get his gear going and to close that gap. Hoste chose the right gear, did a very explosive sprint but too early. Speaking of big gears, it looked from the brief coverage on Versus (USA TV) that Boonen might have been somewhat optimistic* as to gear choice on the Mur. He just about stopped around the time Ballan went around. *Or very, by two or three teeth. Ouch, painful to watch. Was there an equipment (derailleur) problem? --D-y |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On Apr 9, 12:24 pm, " wrote:
On Apr 9, 8:53 am, "Kenny" wrote: Ballan chose a much bigger gear than Hoste. That's why Hoste's acceleration made Ballan lose an entire bike length. With the slightly uphill finish, it would have been impossible for Ballan to get his gear going and to close that gap. Hoste chose the right gear, did a very explosive sprint but too early. Speaking of big gears, it looked from the brief coverage on Versus (USA TV) that Boonen might have been somewhat optimistic* as to gear choice on the Mur. He just about stopped around the time Ballan went around. *Or very, by two or three teeth. Ouch, painful to watch. Was there an equipment (derailleur) problem? --D-y Kevin Hulsmans was chasing down the early breakaway for a long time, helped by Johan Van Summeren (Predictor-Lotto), so he couldn't play a role in the finale, neither. "Yes, we were defeated," he said. "It was a really long day in the end. Tom Boonen came to a fall quite early in the race and I assisted him the whole day. Tom's wrist was hurting and he couldn't put pressure on it. Of course, the disappointment is great - we would have liked to party here!" |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On Apr 9, 6:53 am, "Kenny" wrote:
On 8 apr, 19:52, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: Hoste went from 150 meters today. Normally that's not too far out. Fly in the ointment though. Look at this photo: No he didn't. He went from more than 200m. Jackass - No he didn't. From: http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=2745 Alessandro Ballan (Lampre) pulled the last ounces of strength out of his tired legs to come by Leif Hoste (Predictor-Lotto) in the closing metres to win the Tour of Flanders. The Italian looked like he was heading for another second place with Hoste glued to his wheel for the final kilometre and a half. But when Hoste powered past with 150m to go, Ballan managed to get behind the Belgian. Incredibly, he had enough to go again in the last 20m to win by a wheel from the disappointed Hoste. snipend From: http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007...07/?id=results The duo went full-gas and fairly traded pulls over the final 16 kilometres from the Muur. Ballan was forced to lead over the final kilometre, where the two went increasing slower while the chase closed in at only a few seconds. At 150 metres, Hoste opened up his sprint on Ballan's left, thinking he had enough to hold it to the line. But the 1.90m tall rider that usually leads out for Daniele Bennati kept on his rival's wheel, finally coming around in the ten metres to steal glory. snipend |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On 9 apr, 23:51, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote:
On Apr 9, 6:53 am, "Kenny" wrote: On 8 apr, 19:52, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: Hoste went from 150 meters today. Normally that's not too far out. Fly in the ointment though. Look at this photo: No he didn't. He went from more than 200m. Jackass - No he didn't. From:http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=2745 Asswipe - Yes he did. Watch the footage instead of reading reports. I can easily send you a frozen image that prooves it all. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On Apr 9, 11:31 pm, "Kenny" wrote:
On 9 apr, 23:51, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: On Apr 9, 6:53 am, "Kenny" wrote: On 8 apr, 19:52, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: Hoste went from 150 meters today. Normally that's not too far out. Fly in the ointment though. Look at this photo: No he didn't. He went from more than 200m. Jackass - No he didn't. From:http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=2745 Asswipe - Yes he did. Watch the footage instead of reading reports. I can easily send you a frozen image that prooves it all. Dumbass - I should believe you instead of them? Hahahaha! BTW, going from 200m in an uphill is even bigger tactical miscue. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The real reason Hoste lost
On 10 Apr 2007 00:06:09 -0700, "Kurgan Gringioni"
wrote: On Apr 9, 11:31 pm, "Kenny" wrote: On 9 apr, 23:51, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: On Apr 9, 6:53 am, "Kenny" wrote: On 8 apr, 19:52, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: Hoste went from 150 meters today. Normally that's not too far out. Fly in the ointment though. Look at this photo: No he didn't. He went from more than 200m. Jackass - No he didn't. From:http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=2745 Asswipe - Yes he did. Watch the footage instead of reading reports. I can easily send you a frozen image that prooves it all. Dumbass - I should believe you instead of them? Hahahaha! BTW, going from 200m in an uphill is even bigger tactical miscue. thanks, K. Gringioni. Work it out from here. http://www.eurosport.co.uk/cycling/m...vid38376.shtml Ballan was controlling it all the way - another 50m and he would have led it out and Hoste would not have got round him. Excellent ride by Ballan all the way in from the Muur. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The REAL Reason for license fee increases | crit pro | Racing | 50 | November 11th 04 01:59 PM |
The REAL Reason for license fee increases | crit pro | Racing | 0 | November 10th 04 08:31 AM |
The Real Reason Crit Pro Hates Joey | hold my beer and watch this... | Racing | 3 | October 3rd 04 11:27 PM |
Merckx, Hoste Move to Discovery | Richard Adams | Racing | 2 | August 5th 04 05:08 AM |