|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the irony. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the irony. You are obviously too stupid to understand that the vast majority of drivers and pedestrians detest cycling scum and could not give a flying **** about their safety. Have you always been stupid? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote: On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the irony. You are obviously too stupid to understand that the vast majority of drivers and pedestrians detest cycling scum and could not give a flying **** about their safety. I am smart enough to understand that if people are too afraid to cycle they will drive and cause more congestion. Have you always been stupid? What metric do you use to measure stupidity? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:18:43 GMT, Simon Jester
wrote: On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...-the-road-for- safer-ride-at-home-pkq778j6z A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the irony. You are obviously too stupid to understand that the vast majority of drivers and pedestrians detest cycling scum and could not give a flying **** about their safety. Do you really feel this way? I sense much anger in this one. Stop reading the Daily Mail immediately and take up a relaxing hobby. Stamp collecting might suit you. I am smart enough to understand that if people are too afraid to cycle they will drive and cause more congestion. Have you always been stupid? What metric do you use to measure stupidity? He has his own benchmark. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:01:43 -0000 (UTC)
"Kerr-Mudd,John" wrote: He has his own benchmark. So one Pounder is thick, two Pounders is as dim as Nugent and half a Pounder is average IQ, while zero Pounders is someone who's never done anything stupid ever. Does that sound about right? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 23:37:46 +0100, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z Why not cycle off road? Bicycles are for enjoying the countryside. Cars are for roads. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Friday, April 26, 2019 at 6:11:58 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 23:37:46 +0100, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z Why not cycle off road? Bicycles are for enjoying the countryside. Cars are for roads. So why are so many of them parked on pavements? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
a third of a million less road lice !!
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:25:15 +0100, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, April 26, 2019 at 6:11:58 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 23:37:46 +0100, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z Why not cycle off road? Bicycles are for enjoying the countryside. Cars are for roads. So why are so many of them parked on pavements? To let other cars past. Pavements are wide enough for two people, or one person and half a car. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Troll-feeding Senile Idiot Alert!
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:25:15 -0700 (PDT), Simon Jester, another mentally
challenged, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: Why not cycle off road? Bicycles are for enjoying the countryside. Cars are for roads. So why are so many of them parked on pavements? So why is it only senile idiots that keep feeding the retarded PHucker troll? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happens to uninsured road lice? | [email protected] | UK | 0 | March 19th 18 10:36 PM |
The fight back against road lice | Mr Pounder Esquire | UK | 1 | December 9th 17 09:34 AM |
More road lice | Mr Pounder Esquire | UK | 5 | August 14th 17 12:35 PM |
More road lice | Mr Pounder Esquire | UK | 1 | August 29th 15 07:14 PM |