|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT : Here's a puzzle for all you snowbound folk
Snowbound, bored at work, whatever. Kept me amused for a couple of hours :-) The Wises Chat Once, upon a time, it was a famous wise named Hasen Said. The people named him "The Wise of the Wises". One day, while travelling in the world, he arrived at a sultan's Court, where he was received with high honour. The sultan treated him with food, lodged him and, one day, said to him: "I govern my country with the help of the Wises Chat, who is said to gather the 12 wisest men in my country. However, can you put them to a test so that they can succeed only if they are worthy of the honour I give them?" Hasen Said thought a bit and then said: "All right, gather them." When all the wises have been gathered, Hasen said to them: "Oh, Wise Men, your king, the sultan, gathered you to show us all your wisdom. The servants had put a box before everyone of you. All these boxes are identical. Here, in my bag, I have twelve precious stones: some of them are emeralds, the others are rubies. I invite everyone of you to get out of this room, while I put one of these stones in his box, so that everyone can see the others' stones, but he doesn't know his own stone." And Hasen invited the first of the Wises to leave off the room. He put in his bag a ruby. After he returned, the second left and Hasen put in his box an emerald. To the third, he put an emerald. And so on until the last. When the last Wise returned, Hasen said to them: "Everyone of you saw the others' stones, but he doesn't know his own stone. If you are wises indeed, and if you trust your mind and your eyes, nothing prevent you to carry out my wish: all of you who have emeralds, come here and put your box to the sultan's feet." Unfortunately, nobody comes. The sultan got then angry and ordered that all his Wises Chat be banished from the Court, but Hasen stopped him: "Don't act rashly, Sir. Me too I would have done the same thing." Ten minutes later, Hasen said to them again: "All of you who have emeralds, come here and put your box at the sultan's feet!" The same silence, nobody came. Hasen repeated the same invitation every ten minutes, and after an hour, some of the Wises raised up and came to the sultan, who opened their boxes: they all contained emeralds! He asked to see the others' boxes: there were all rubies. And we have to say that while all this hour, the Wises didn't say anything, they only thought. "Oh, Sir, Hasen said to the sultan, you may be proud of your Wises Chat. They are really wise men!" And saying them good bye, he left them. The story ends here, but we invite you to continue it, showing how many emeralds Hasen had put into the Wises' boxes and how did they find out what stone he owns... ----------------------------------------------------------------- There _is_ enough information here. I'll post the solution in a bit. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
silangdon wrote:
There _is_ enough information here. I'll post the solution in a bit. Page down for spoiler response. Tony 'tis easy. Six rubies, six emeralds. All those who could see six rubies and five emeralds must have an emerald. Otherwise the test is unfair in that the same information is not available to all of the contestants and some would be disadvantaged in the test. Suprised it took them an hour to work it out. Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Raven" wrote in message ... silangdon wrote: There _is_ enough information here. I'll post the solution in a bit. Page down for spoiler response. Tony 'tis easy. Six rubies, six emeralds. All those who could see six rubies and five emeralds must have an emerald. Otherwise the test is unfair in that the same information is not available to all of the contestants and some would be disadvantaged in the test. Suprised it took them an hour to work it out. Does it say there were six rubies and six emeralds? It just said some were rubys and some emeralds. I could have been a 7 to 5 split for example. Without knowing there were six of each it's not possible to work it out the way you describe. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"silangdon" wrote in message
news Snowbound, bored at work, whatever. Kept me amused for a couple of hours :-) "Oh, Wise Men, your king, the sultan, gathered you to show us all your wisdom. The servants had put a box before everyone of you. All these boxes are identical. Here, in my bag, I have twelve precious stones: some of them are emeralds, the others are rubies. I invite everyone of you to get out of this room, while I put one of these stones in his box, so that everyone can see the others' stones, but he doesn't know his own stone." "Everyone of you saw the others' stones, but he doesn't know his own stone. If you are wises indeed, and if you trust your mind and your eyes, nothing prevent you to carry out my wish: all of you who have emeralds, come here and put your box to the sultan's feet." Easy peasy. "You have an emerald. What do I have?" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Hewitt composed the following;:
"Tony Raven" wrote in message ... silangdon wrote: There _is_ enough information here. I'll post the solution in a bit. Page down for spoiler response. Tony 'tis easy. Six rubies, six emeralds. All those who could see six rubies and five emeralds must have an emerald. Otherwise the test is unfair in that the same information is not available to all of the contestants and some would be disadvantaged in the test. Suprised it took them an hour to work it out. Does it say there were six rubies and six emeralds? It just said some were rubys and some emeralds. I could have been a 7 to 5 split for example. Without knowing there were six of each it's not possible to work it out the way you describe. I originally thought as TR did, but what got me against that was the original distribution .. Ruby, Emerald, Emerald and so on ... Maybe there are eleven emeralds and only one Ruby, though ICBW. -- Paul ... www.4x4prejudice.org (8(|) Homer Rules ..... Doh !!! ebay stuff Item No 5754626752 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Danny@Kendal composed the following;:
"silangdon" wrote in message news Snowbound, bored at work, whatever. Kept me amused for a couple of hours :-) "Oh, Wise Men, your king, the sultan, gathered you to show us all your wisdom. The servants had put a box before everyone of you. All these boxes are identical. Here, in my bag, I have twelve precious stones: some of them are emeralds, the others are rubies. I invite everyone of you to get out of this room, while I put one of these stones in his box, so that everyone can see the others' stones, but he doesn't know his own stone." "Everyone of you saw the others' stones, but he doesn't know his own stone. If you are wises indeed, and if you trust your mind and your eyes, nothing prevent you to carry out my wish: all of you who have emeralds, come here and put your box to the sultan's feet." Easy peasy. "You have an emerald. What do I have?" Bzzzt "And we have to say that while all this hour, the Wises didn't say anything, they only thought" -- Paul ... www.4x4prejudice.org (8(|) Homer Rules ..... Doh !!! ebay stuff Item No 5754626752 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
There _is_ enough information here.
Here goes. I think there are 4 rubies and 8 emeralds. The Wises must all assume that the others are not idiots; and my assumption assumes that there are at least two of each type of stone from the wording. Emerald holders would take the following times to solve each possible distribution. We'll look at it from the point of view of Ed, who holds an emerald: 10r:2e - immediate (t=0). Ed can see 10r:1e, therefore must be holding 1e (assuming 11r:1e violates the initial conditions). 9r:3e - second iteration (t=10). Ed sees 9r:2e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 10r:2e which can be solved first time. As it wasn't, it must be 9r:3e and Ed is holding an emerald. 8r:4e - third iteration (t=20). Ed sees 8r:3e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 9r:3e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 8r:4e and Ed is holding an emerald. 7r:5e - fourth iteration (t=30). Ed sees 7r:4e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 8r:4e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 7r:5e and Ed is holding an emerald. 6r:6e - fifth iteration (t=40). Ed sees 6r:5e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 7r:5e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 6r:6e and Ed is holding an emerald. 5r:7e - sixth iteration (t=50). Ed sees 5r:6e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 6r:6e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 5r:7e and Ed is holding an emerald. 4r:8e - seventh iteration (t=60). Ed sees 4r:7e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 5r:7e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 4r:8e and Ed is holding an emerald. Interestingly, the ruby holders know that they do not have an emerald before the emerald holders know they do... I think. -- Mark. http://tranchant.plus.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 24/2/05 2:10 pm, in article
, "Mark Tranchant" wrote: There _is_ enough information here. Here goes. I think there are 4 rubies and 8 emeralds. The Wises must all assume that the others are not idiots; and my assumption assumes that there are at least two of each type of stone from the wording. Emerald holders would take the following times to solve each possible distribution. We'll look at it from the point of view of Ed, who holds an emerald: 10r:2e - immediate (t=0). Ed can see 10r:1e, therefore must be holding 1e (assuming 11r:1e violates the initial conditions). 9r:3e - second iteration (t=10). Ed sees 9r:2e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 10r:2e which can be solved first time. As it wasn't, it must be 9r:3e and Ed is holding an emerald. 8r:4e - third iteration (t=20). Ed sees 8r:3e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 9r:3e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 8r:4e and Ed is holding an emerald. 7r:5e - fourth iteration (t=30). Ed sees 7r:4e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 8r:4e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 7r:5e and Ed is holding an emerald. 6r:6e - fifth iteration (t=40). Ed sees 6r:5e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 7r:5e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 6r:6e and Ed is holding an emerald. 5r:7e - sixth iteration (t=50). Ed sees 5r:6e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 6r:6e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 5r:7e and Ed is holding an emerald. 4r:8e - seventh iteration (t=60). Ed sees 4r:7e; if he were holding a ruby, the distribution would be 5r:7e which would have been solved last iteration. As it wasn't, it must be 4r:8e and Ed is holding an emerald. Interestingly, the ruby holders know that they do not have an emerald before the emerald holders know they do... I think. It seems close. I think Ruby and Emerald holders know at the same time. OOps, no they don't, emeralds know first. 1. If there is one emerald then the person with the emerald can only see rubies so he gets up. 2. If noone got up, then there must be at least 2 emeralds. If the man can see only one, then he knows that he has the second. And gets up. 3. If noone got up, then there are at least three emeralds.. Each man with an emerald gets up on the n+1 th iteration where n is the number of emeralds he can see. As the ruby holders can see n+1 emeralds, they would only get up on the following iteration. ...d |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
David Martin wrote:
Each man with an emerald gets up on the n+1 th iteration where n is the number of emeralds he can see. As the ruby holders can see n+1 emeralds, they would only get up on the following iteration. That fails the test objectives though in that it requires the emerald holders to be wise whereas the ruby holders don't need to have a clue. As a result he would be making a false assumption that the ones who didn't get up knew they shouldn't rather than they are just sitting tight being unwise and not having yet worked it out. As he is the Wisest of the wise he would not make such a simple mistake so that answer must be incorrect. The only correct one can be six-six because it is the only option where the information presented to each of them is identical and therefore an equal test of their wisdom whether they get up or not. Of course if they were really wise they would have worked it out within minutes not hours. YMMV Tony |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RR Fall on the water | small change | Mountain Biking | 0 | November 5th 04 03:10 AM |
Fall is here! | tcmedara | Mountain Biking | 0 | October 10th 04 11:01 PM |
Lance's fall season..........??? | Charles Hizark | Racing | 12 | August 27th 04 01:50 AM |
Will I fall over by going too slow | Willy Smallboy | Techniques | 20 | March 26th 04 04:54 PM |
Lance's fall season | Heinz Getzler | Racing | 4 | July 31st 03 03:42 PM |