Motorist Ends Up In the Pokey

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/cycl...amera-48535704

On 10/07/2017 05:37, Bret Cahill wrote:

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/cycl...amera-48535704

Was it really a good idea for cyclists to ride (at least) two abreast on
that road?

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 5:07:12 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 10/07/2017 05:37, Bret Cahill wrote:

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/cycl...amera-48535704

Was it really a good idea for cyclists to ride (at least) two abreast on
that road?

I cannot see why it makes a difference, the drivers would have to cross to the other lane to safely pass the cyclists anyway.
More importantly how is this relevant?

On 11/07/2017 17:00, wrote:

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 5:07:12 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 10/07/2017 05:37, Bret Cahill wrote:

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/cycl...amera-48535704

Was it really a good idea for cyclists to ride (at least) two abreast on
that road?

I cannot see why it makes a difference, the drivers would have to cross to the other lane to safely pass the cyclists anyway.
More importantly how is this relevant?

Is that a "yes", a "no" or just you declining to answer the question?

[NB: In every state in the USA, a double yellow median line has the same
sort of legal effect as a double white centre line here. Your assertion
that the driver "would have to cross to the other lane" is ill-advised.]