|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg.
Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. Location: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote:
Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike cyclists. I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. -- Dave - Cyclists VORC Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow out of. There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want to ride a bike." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:21:33 +0000, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote: On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote: Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? No. Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? No. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike cyclists. Possible - but by no means a guarantee. I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. Oh - so they crash instead! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On 22/03/2014 10:02, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:21:33 +0000, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote: On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote: Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? No. Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? No. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike cyclists. Possible - but by no means a guarantee. 1.2 million of the 34 million drivers are uninsured - approx 3.5%, compared to the vast majority of uninsured cyclists. (Est/Min figures). The MIB takes care of claims from uninsured motorists. Who takes care of the claims from uninsured cyclists? Since 2005, when police were given powers to stop vehicles identified as being driven without insurance, an average of 500 have been seized nationwide each day. Of those, an estimated 30% are crushed. How many cycles have been crushed? I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. Oh - so they crash instead! Motorists account for 1 single fatality per 208,311,415 miles driven. A simply incredible safety record. -- Dave-Cyclists VORK Motorists account for 1 single fatality per 208,311,415 miles driven. A simply incredible safety record. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:06:51 +0000, Dave - Cyclists VORK
wrote: On 22/03/2014 10:02, Bertie Wooster wrote: On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:21:33 +0000, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote: On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote: Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? No. Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? No. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike cyclists. Possible - but by no means a guarantee. 1.2 million of the 34 million drivers are uninsured - approx 3.5%, compared to the vast majority of uninsured cyclists. (Est/Min figures). Where do you get your figures for uninsured cyclists from? I would expect a majority of cyclists to have third party insurance as a minimum, but I am willing to have my expectation shown to be incorrect. The MIB takes care of claims from uninsured motorists. Who takes care of the claims from uninsured cyclists? Since 2005, when police were given powers to stop vehicles identified as being driven without insurance, an average of 500 have been seized nationwide each day. Of those, an estimated 30% are crushed. How many cycles have been crushed? I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. Oh - so they crash instead! Motorists account for 1 single fatality per 208,311,415 miles driven. A simply incredible safety record. I expect Judith to pounce on that very precise figure any second now. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:50:47 +0000, Bertie Wooster
wrote: snip I would expect a majority of cyclists to have third party insurance as a minimum, but I am willing to have my expectation shown to be incorrect. Half of the poorest households do not have home contents insurance. More than half of all renters do not have home contents insurance Given that most cyclists are poor: this probably means that half the cyclists on the road have no insurance. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On 22/03/2014 19:50, Bertie Wooster wrote:
Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike cyclists. Possible - but by no means a guarantee. 1.2 million of the 34 million drivers are uninsured - approx 3.5%, compared to the vast majority of uninsured cyclists. (Est/Min figures). Where do you get your figures for uninsured cyclists from? There lies the problem. Since cyclists are an unregulated rabble, we have no reliable figures. I would expect a majority of cyclists to have third party insurance as a minimum, but I am willing to have my expectation shown to be incorrect. Because you cannot support it. Since insurance is not compulsory & cyclists are well know sponging freeloaders, we can assume most are uninsured. Motorists account for 1 single fatality per 208,311,415 miles driven. A simply incredible safety record. I expect Judith to pounce on that very precise figure any second now. -- Dave-Cyclists VORT Motorists pay £46 billion a year in extra taxes, specifically so they can use the roads. Less than £10 billion of this is spent on roads. Q: Do cyclists pay any specific, extra taxes in order to use their vehicles on the road? A: No. They are sponging freeloaders. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:21:33 +0000, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote:
On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote: Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? And what is wrong with that? Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? No. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Some cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. IFIFY CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike some cyclists. IFIFY I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. I do not think so. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
"Peter Keller" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:21:33 +0000, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote: On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote: Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? And what is wrong with that? Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? No. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Some cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. IFIFY CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike some cyclists. IFIFY I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. I do not think There, I've fixed it for you. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Motor cars are dangerous.
On 22/03/2014 11:16, Tarcap wrote:
"Peter Keller" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:21:33 +0000, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote: On 21/03/2014 23:41, Bertie Wooster wrote: Earlier today I left Chinbook Meadows with Meg. Is that what you have called your daughter? And what is wrong with that? Meg sat nicely on the pavement infront of the zebra crossing. Isn't that child abuse? No. Cars in both directions stopped for us, and I called Meg to heel and started to cross the road. Some cyclists wouldn't have stopped at all. IFIFY CRASH A young lad in a car with a loud beatbox, smashed into the car infront of him. That car then smashed into the shiny new car in front of her. And that car was shunted onto the crossing narrowly missing Meg. Thankfully they will all be insured. Unlike some cyclists. IFIFY I continued over the crossing and went on my way, betting that the three car drivers wished they had gone by bike. They have far more sense than that. I do not think There, I've fixed it for you. I call 'Jackanory' to the whole incident. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More dangerous cars! | Doug[_3_] | UK | 26 | June 13th 10 10:41 AM |
They don't even know why these dangerous cars surge out of control! | Doug[_3_] | UK | 124 | March 7th 10 10:22 AM |
Even more dangerous cars allowed on our roads? | Doug[_3_] | UK | 35 | February 13th 10 07:40 PM |
Very dangerous cars are allowed on our roads. | Doug[_3_] | UK | 183 | February 8th 10 11:05 AM |
"Cycling is not dangerous. Cars are dangerous." | Doug[_3_] | UK | 56 | September 14th 09 05:57 PM |