|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
Two fourth-place finishes in the last two Olympics are enough.
Thorburn, a physician at Stanford, is done with big-time bike racing. We talked to her this week in San Francisco...the story is up on CycleTo. Here's a direct link: http://cycleto.com/index.php?option=...article&id=509 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
On Sep 5, 12:15*pm, caffetrieste wrote:
Two fourth-place finishes in the last two Olympics are enough. Thorburn, a physician at Stanford, is done with big-time bike racing. We talked to her this week in San Francisco...the story is up on CycleTo. Here's a direct link: http://cycleto.com/index.php?option=...article&id=509 You keep insisting on these incorrect facts. To make it worse, you're ignoring one of the great achievements of the best women's bike racer of all time. -ilan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
On Sep 5, 12:33*pm, wrote:
On Sep 5, 12:15*pm, caffetrieste wrote: Two fourth-place finishes in the last two Olympics are enough. Thorburn, a physician at Stanford, is done with big-time bike racing. We talked to her this week in San Francisco...the story is up on CycleTo. Here's a direct link: http://cycleto.com/index.php?option=...article&id=509 You keep insisting on these incorrect facts. To make it worse, you're ignoring one of the great achievements of the best women's bike racer of all time. -ilan Typo...my bad...4th in '04, 5th in '08. Mi scusi. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
wrote in message ... On Sep 5, 12:15 pm, caffetrieste wrote: Two fourth-place finishes in the last two Olympics are enough. Thorburn, a physician at Stanford, is done with big-time bike racing. We talked to her this week in San Francisco...the story is up on CycleTo. Here's a direct link: http://cycleto.com/index.php?option=...article&id=509 You keep insisting on these incorrect facts. To make it worse, you're ignoring one of the great achievements of the best women's bike racer of all time. -ilan She certainly was a good TT rider, one of the best, but she missed being World and Olympic champion, perhaps by working full time. I don't buy that someone can be all they can be in a sport, by working a fulltime job, and training in their spare time because I did it for years, and it sucks. You are often beat after work, and you training suffers, and then in turn, you are beat at work, you work suffers because you spend hours training after work. If Christine was training full time and really focused on winning the games like Armstrong and Cooke were, perhaps it would of been Gold and Silver for the Americans. However, on the flip side, that was superb effort she gave in the Olympic RR this year. She did a great job pulling at the front for such a long time, and she got the Lions share of the coverage as well. Black Bart |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
On Sep 5, 8:06*pm, "Black Bart Roberts" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sep 5, 12:15 pm, caffetrieste wrote: Two fourth-place finishes in the last two Olympics are enough. Thorburn, a physician at Stanford, is done with big-time bike racing. We talked to her this week in San Francisco...the story is up on CycleTo. Here's a direct link: http://cycleto.com/index.php?option=...article&id=509 You keep insisting on these incorrect facts. To make it worse, you're ignoring one of the great achievements of the best women's bike racer of all time. -ilan She certainly was a good TT rider, one of the best, but she missed being World and Olympic champion, perhaps by working full time. I don't buy that someone can be all they can be in a sport, by working a fulltime job, and training in their spare time because I did it for years, and it sucks. You are often beat after work, and you training suffers, and then in turn, you are beat at work, you work suffers because you spend hours training after work. If Christine was training full time and really focused on winning the games like Armstrong and Cooke were, perhaps it would of been Gold and Silver for the Americans. However, on the flip side, that was superb effort she gave in the Olympic RR this year. She did a great job pulling at the front for such a long time, and she got the Lions share of the coverage as well. Black Bart I know her from being at Stanford and she is one of a fairly significant number of top riders who ended up doing a Ph.D. in medicine or biology (I know at least 4). I personally think that their scientific career is a waste of time compared to their cycling. In particular, in areas like medicine or biology, a Ph.D. is more often than not just a drone who carries out an experiment thought out by the adviser and the results have little or no impact on anything. The limited discussions I had with stanford graduate students convinced me that their research was useless but not in the noble sense. They then end up doing a career than thousands of other people do equally well or better when instead they have the opportunity of being the best in the world at something, namely cycling. In a lot of cases, the problem is that their cultural background was such that their life would not be fulfilled unless they got a Ph.D I respect more the riders who just decided to be professional cyclists after getting a bachelors degree and went far beyond expectations, e.g., Nicole Freedman. -ilan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
wrote in message ... On Sep 5, 8:06 pm, "Black Bart Roberts" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sep 5, 12:15 pm, caffetrieste wrote: Two fourth-place finishes in the last two Olympics are enough. Thorburn, a physician at Stanford, is done with big-time bike racing. We talked to her this week in San Francisco...the story is up on CycleTo. Here's a direct link: http://cycleto.com/index.php?option=...article&id=509 You keep insisting on these incorrect facts. To make it worse, you're ignoring one of the great achievements of the best women's bike racer of all time. -ilan She certainly was a good TT rider, one of the best, but she missed being World and Olympic champion, perhaps by working full time. I don't buy that someone can be all they can be in a sport, by working a fulltime job, and training in their spare time because I did it for years, and it sucks. You are often beat after work, and you training suffers, and then in turn, you are beat at work, you work suffers because you spend hours training after work. If Christine was training full time and really focused on winning the games like Armstrong and Cooke were, perhaps it would of been Gold and Silver for the Americans. However, on the flip side, that was superb effort she gave in the Olympic RR this year. She did a great job pulling at the front for such a long time, and she got the Lions share of the coverage as well. Black Bart I know her from being at Stanford and she is one of a fairly significant number of top riders who ended up doing a Ph.D. in medicine or biology (I know at least 4). I personally think that their scientific career is a waste of time compared to their cycling. In particular, in areas like medicine or biology, a Ph.D. is more often than not just a drone who carries out an experiment thought out by the adviser and the results have little or no impact on anything. The limited discussions I had with stanford graduate students convinced me that their research was useless but not in the noble sense. They then end up doing a career than thousands of other people do equally well or better when instead they have the opportunity of being the best in the world at something, namely cycling. In a lot of cases, the problem is that their cultural background was such that their life would not be fulfilled unless they got a Ph.D I respect more the riders who just decided to be professional cyclists after getting a bachelors degree and went far beyond expectations, e.g., Nicole Freedman. -ilan I believe I read either in print or on a video that she said her career was more important then cycling, so there you have it, and that's core and central to part of the problem of women's cycling in America, unlike Europe where women on UCI teams train and race full time. Over the last few years, I was thinking if she would only race and train full time, she could of had the Worlds or the Olympic gold by now! You are right about the career and opportunities, as that would only enhance any career opportunities that might come her way after retirement. As a fan, I felt robbed at times, in fact by a lot of women who could be really good if they trained and raced full time. Nicole Freedman I believed developed her own sponsors for racing, Ford Basis for one, so she kind of supported herself in cycling, and raced while living out of a van at times to race, something I admire a lot, because she really wanted to race and see what she could achieve. I'm not saying Thorburn didn't, but it seems obvious, that her career is more important then cycling. Of course, she will earn millions in her career, and very little from cycling, so its no surprise, but the Olympics is the one rare opportunity where Gold brings both prestige and opens doors in the real world. Here's the deal, even though guys like Engleman, who I used to watch race at Nevada City, are helping women at USWCDP, its not enough I don't think. Part of the problem is the way top women are portrayed in the press and on team websites. Recently I saw Brooke Miller speak about tending tea parties in the past, which is what I also used to see at Nevada City sometimes. Women coming together to race, but as more of a social gathering instead of a serious race where hearts, lungs and legs are singing. Rather instead, a lot of chit-chat at the front of the peloton instead of intense racing. In the press and on team sites, they tend to highlight women careers first, and cycling seems to be more or less their recreational hobby. You always hear about their careers and what degrees and universities they attend and what their career goals are, but you almost never hear about women cyclists who have decided to fully dedicate themselves to pro cycling for a few years to see what they can achieve. Its usually what they can achieve on the side in cycling, as cycling plays second fiddle. That's why we don't have more serious contenders in Europe like Neben and Armstrong who have pretty much fully dedicated themselves to cycling. What we have today in America at our races, are often weekend warriors, who race on the side from their full or part time career jobs. Another problem is teams can't always afford to foot the bill to allow women to race and train full time, but I'm not sure how big a problem that would be, if more women were fully dedicated to do it. It seems they would find the extra money, even though times are tight, and sometimes women have to dig into their own pockets to race. Some teams clearly have a pretty decent budget. But it seems often what you see in the media or on team sites is they try to put the best face on women's cycling by praising their university degrees and careers. Its as if we should honor the career aspects of cyclists more then what they are actually doing on the bike. It seems like a flawed concept, because clearly fans want to see fully dedicated professionals race, and that would be much more exciting. When the USA National B team came back from Europe, I was reading how strong and hard they raced against our women back home now, and that's the big difference between racing full time in Europe and being just a weekend warrior here at home and attending the so called tea parties. On a positive note, at least races today are more serious here then in the past, and the tea parties or social gathering are becoming a thing of the past, as the sport grows, and riders and teams have improved here in America. At least I think they have improved from a couple of years ago. The women at Aarons and Tibco, Colavita are looking better, stronger and more professional then back then. I have noticed the difference at races, although many still work regular jobs. If I understood Carroll correctly in an interview a while back, there are some very serious women riders coming up now from the juniors who will be very dedicated. I understand that some of them are going to be totally awesome, meaning top replacements for Neben and Armstrong when they retire, but it would be nice to hear about more women like that from the USA competing in Europe. However, it was an American who got the gold at the Olympics, so not so bad! Hats off to Kristin Armstrong, got the gold, something Lance never did! Black Bart |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:02:12 -0700, "Black Bart Roberts"
wrote: In the press and on team sites, they tend to highlight women careers first, and cycling seems to be more or less their recreational hobby. You always hear about their careers and what degrees and universities they attend and what their career goals are, but you almost never hear about women cyclists who have decided to fully dedicate themselves to pro cycling for a few years to see what they can achieve. Its usually what they can achieve on the side in cycling, as cycling plays second fiddle. In my city in the last 15 years I can think of four riders who went full-time with 100% focus on cycling, but a big problem was affording it. One had the genetics and skill and also some luck with money and made a long pro career, including fifth at worlds. Another not so good sold everything (she'd made some money as a younger person) and was able to make it to the Olympics. Two others tried it for two years but financial pressure and recognition that they couldn't make it to the top resulted in them ending the quest early. And there's a fifth woman, super-talented, who didn't even try to go full-time, perhaps for reasons you mention. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
Black Bart Roberts wrote:
I believe I read either in print or on a video that she said her career was more important then cycling, so there you have it, and that's core and central to part of the problem of women's cycling in America, unlike Europe where women on UCI teams train and race full time... snip I think that you'd find that the number of full-time women bike racers in the US is not proportionally different than it is for the men. By proportionally, I mean relative to the total population of women racers. Where I live, the ratio of men-to-women licensed racers is nearly 8-to-1, and I'd assume it is at least that unbalanced nationally. snip Another problem is teams can't always afford to foot the bill to allow women to race and train full time, but I'm not sure how big a problem that would be, if more women were fully dedicated to do it. It seems they would find the extra money, even though times are tight, and sometimes women have to dig into their own pockets to race. Some teams clearly have a pretty decent budget. snip Again, I think you have to consider it relative to the total number of women racers. As you know, there were some competitive and well-funded teams in the US this year. Women's racing was hot in the US. Unfortunately, things are looking bleak on both the mens and womens side for next year. Lots of teams folding. Not sure if it's the bad economy, or maybe just a cyclic thing in US racing, but it will mean fewer full-time domestic racers in 2009. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
wrote in message
... The limited discussions I had with stanford graduate students convinced me that their research was useless but not in the noble sense. They then end up doing a career than thousands of other people do equally well or better when instead they have the opportunity of being the best in the world at something, namely cycling. You need to be a little careful there Ilan. I was advised not to bother with getting a degree by several professors at Cal Berkeley since I was already designing electronics and at that time there were quite a few top level designers without a degree of any sort. But the fact is that being without a degree really handicapped me my whole life. Even though I could design with the best of them, I always had to do twice as much to prove that I was capable. So I ALWAYS tell people to get a degree regardless of what anyone else says if they intend to work for someone else. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Christine Thorburn to retire?
In article ,
"Black Bart Roberts" wrote: I was thinking if she would only race and train full time, she could of had Hi there, Bruce. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Christine Thornburn retiring | caffetrieste | Racing | 0 | September 5th 08 08:06 PM |
Where in the US would you retire to ride? | D T W .../\\... | Mountain Biking | 12 | February 20th 07 08:13 PM |
Mancebo to retire... | Keith | Racing | 0 | July 1st 06 12:30 AM |
Christine Malthouse at the Melbourne Bicycle Centre | Euan | Australia | 3 | June 2nd 06 03:14 AM |
Seriously; where should a bikie retire? | Tom Nakashima | Techniques | 5 | January 13th 06 12:23 PM |