Cyclist hunts for witnesses

On 22/08/2013 00:02, JNugent wrote:
On 21/08/2013 23:38, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 21/08/2013 22:43, JNugent wrote:
On 21/08/2013 21:45, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 21/08/2013 11:38, JNugent wrote:
On 21/08/2013 08:55, Brian Robertson wrote:

On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote:

Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range
Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the
cyclist's
antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some
witnesses.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876

Which all goes to convince me even more that a camera on my crash
helmet
is an essential tool that every cyclist should have. Such
behaviour by
car drivers should lead, inevitably, to prosecution and a substantial
ban.

A disqualification from driving for a physical assault with the fists?

Would you extend it to all crimes, or just those alleged to have been
committed against cyclists?

Would you, for instance, impose a "substantial ban" (from driving) for
criminal damage committed by someone damaging a car with a cycle-lock?
Or by hurling a bicycle onto a vehicle's bonnet?

And if not, why not?

Probably just those where a motorist has used his vehicle as a deadly
weapon in a deliberate manner.

Thank you for confirming that you would impose a "substantial ban" (from
driving) for criminal damage committed by someone damaging a car with a
cycle-lock or by hurling a bicycle onto a vehicle's bonnet, as long as
the criminal cyclist had a driving licence.

Of course, a disqualification would have little effect on someone
without a licence.


Plenty are handed out to people who don't have licences. And your
point is?

I was thanking you for clarifying your own point.

Have you forgotten *already*?

Forgotten what? I genuinely don't know what you are going on about.