|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle
paths/lanes? Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? While in Belgium recently I noticed that there were a much greater number of cyclists and all of them were using the cycle-lanes provided. Are UK cyclists more stupid or more bloody-minded? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
On Mar 15, 8:02*pm, "Mr. Benn" wrote:
Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? While in Belgium recently I noticed that there were a much greater number of cyclists and all of them were using the cycle-lanes provided. Are UK cyclists more stupid or more bloody-minded? Because the militant cyclists believe, for reasons known only to themselves, that they have to make a political point every time they take to the road. They more often than not are involved in collisions because of this attitude allied to their actions. They're a menace and a law onto themselves and should be summarily executed. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
"Mr. Benn" writes:
Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. On a main road near here it is even more idiotic. Along one stretch of road (40 limit), from a roundabout to a set a traffic lights[1], there was been a cycle path separated from the road by a wide grass verge. The road used to be wide enough for 2 lanes of traffic. When they recently resurfaced the road they narrowed it by painting white lines on either side of the road to create another cycle lane. A couple of months ago, that stretch of road was closed for a few hours during morning rush hour because a cyclist was hit by a lorry and killed. [1] where the limit changes to 30. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:02:57 -0000, "Mr. Benn" wrote:
Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Because they are rarely suitable for any but leisure cyclists. Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? It would almost certainly be an illegal law, and would also be very stupid because it would be impossible to define "perfectly good" in any meaningful way. While in Belgium recently I noticed that there were a much greater number of cyclists and all of them were using the cycle-lanes provided. Are UK cyclists more stupid or more bloody-minded? I don't believe they are likely to be either. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Jesus to His followers: "You did WHAT in My Name?!?" To reply by email, my address is alexDOTheneyATgmailDOTcom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
Alex Heney wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:02:57 -0000, "Mr. Benn" wrote: Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Because they are rarely suitable for any but leisure cyclists. What other type are there? Why are the cycle paths no good? Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? It would almost certainly be an illegal law, How can you have an illegal law? -- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
"Mr. Benn" wrote in message ... Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Many started life as footpaths so are below the standard needed for bikes. They need to have a smooth surface like a road, but also should not be interrupted every fifty yards by a side-road where you are expected to stop and give way, or be full of obstacles to navigate around. On the road you can make much better time. Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. I don't remember the last time I saw cyclists 2 abreast, let alone 3. You're either lying, or there was a cycling event on. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? While in Belgium recently I noticed that there were a much greater number of cyclists and all of them were using the cycle-lanes provided. Are UK cyclists more stupid or more bloody-minded? The ones I've seen in Holland are purpose-built high-quality cycle lanes, not the result of some council slapping white paint over a few pavements and calling them cycle lanes. The worst I've seen recently were in Bologna (where you have to navigate around bus shelters, big wheelie bins, bollards, etc) which would probably suit a 3-year-old on a tricycle but not anyone trying to get anywhere. -- Bartc |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
On 16/03/2012 01:05, BartC wrote:
The ones I've seen in Holland are purpose-built high-quality cycle lanes, not the result of some council slapping white paint over a few pavements and calling them cycle lanes. The worst I've seen recently were in Bologna (where you have to navigate around bus shelters, big wheelie bins, bollards, etc) which would probably suit a 3-year-old on a tricycle but not anyone trying to get anywhere. In my area the council just painted a white line about a half metre away from the kerb and called the resulting lane riddled with drains and regularly covered by parked cars, bins etc. a cycle lane. They could proudly declare a huge mileage of cycle lanes when, in fact, most of it is little more than an unnavigable narrow bit of the road. We do have dedicated cycle lanes that but many are overgrown with bushes because there is no money in the budget to cut back the vegetation and any cycle groups who volunteer to adopt a lane and do the cutting back gets told that any such action will be regarded as vandalism and criminal damage. However on the few good cycle lanes we have, even in good weather and good light we still get cyclists on the roads. Apparently (from speaking to some hard-core cyclists) leisure cyclists use lanes, *real* cyclists use the road. Andy |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
On Mar 15, 8:02*pm, "Mr. Benn" wrote:
Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Because most of the paths/lanes are rubbish, as BartC has pointed out. In Britain as a whole priority is given to motorised traffic and vulnerable road users are neglected and discriminated against. It is often pointed out that road design and operation is primarily to speed up traffic flow and cycle paths/lanes can therefore be perceived as a way of removing those who might slow traffic flow. There was an attempt a while back to alter the Highway Code so as to make some cycle paths/lanes mandatory but this was firmly resisted and didn't take place. -- . All public road users are equal but some are more equal than others. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
BartC wrote:
Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. I don't remember the last time I saw cyclists 2 abreast, let alone 3. You're either lying, or there was a cycling event on. I remember, it was yesterday. Maybe it is area specific? Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? While in Belgium recently I noticed that there were a much greater number of cyclists and all of them were using the cycle-lanes provided. Are UK cyclists more stupid or more bloody-minded? The ones I've seen in Holland are purpose-built high-quality cycle lanes, not the result of some council slapping white paint over a few pavements and calling them cycle lanes. There is no money available to repair roads, let alone cater to a few people who complain about cycle lanes not being olympic standard. The worst I've seen recently were in Bologna (where you have to navigate around bus shelters, big wheelie bins, bollards, etc) which would probably suit a 3-year-old on a tricycle but not anyone trying to get anywhere. Then the solution is to reduce the obstacles not make new roads for the obstacles to live in. -- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why are so many cyclists so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes?
On 15/03/2012 20:02, Mr. Benn wrote:
Why are so many cyclists in the UK so reluctant to use the cycle paths/lanes? Here in North Wales we have new cycle lanes built (at great cost) parallel to the main roads but a large number of cyclists insist on riding ( sometimes 2 or 3 abreast) on the road. Cyclists complain when there aren't any cycle-lanes provided for them, yet when they do get them, they don't use them. Would a law stating that "cycling along a main road when there is a perfectly good cycle-path running parallel to it is illegal" be of any use do you think? While in Belgium recently I noticed that there were a much greater number of cyclists and all of them were using the cycle-lanes provided. Are UK cyclists more stupid or more bloody-minded? The other aspect is the enthusiasm of a council to encourage cycling. We have an A road with a 40mph limit. The pavement is a designated national cycle route. There are no markings on the pavement to indicate its status. Except for small white triangles on either side of the lampposts in the centre of the track. There are bus shelters and rubbish bins impinging on the track. Because it was widened, it has now become an extended parking area. The surface is uneven - repairs and 'tracks' from cable installation. At side junctions there is no right of way. This tends to be irrelevant as you have to stop and dismount to manoeuvre over the 3-4" kerbs. So, most cyclists use the road - a 40mph A road with frequent traffic islands throttling the flow. And these cyclists are not popular with the commuter car drivers. Impasse? Flop |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclists as organ donors + cycle lanes | delboy | UK | 195 | January 7th 10 11:39 AM |
Motorists drive closer to cyclists on cycle lanes, says CTC | Ron Ruff | Techniques | 1 | September 18th 09 12:54 AM |
Novice cyclists on Londons' roads (From Are Cycle lanes any use?) | David Lloyd | UK | 19 | June 15th 07 04:04 PM |
BBC Radio 4 discussion on campaign to force cyclists to use cycle lanes. | Paulmouk | UK | 14 | March 13th 06 09:42 PM |
If ped's are so afraid of 'pavemnet cyclists' why do they walk in cycle paths? | Howard | UK | 35 | June 13th 04 07:29 PM |