|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Mechanical Efficiency
On 4/21/2017 11:13 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:26 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: Not true, Jeff. The tension in the chain is a constant The load on each pin in the free upper span is exactly the same, and it doesn't change if the chain is longer, i.e. has more pins. A normal chain with a 100 pound load has 100 pounds on each pin, no matter how long. Argh. We went through this exercise a few years ago in this newsgroup when I allegedly made the same mistake. Am I wrong again? (I just hate it when that happens). Well yes, you're wrong. I don't remember the previous discussion, so I can't comment on the "again" part. The way I look at it is that if I replace each link in the upper part of the chain loop with a spring scale, methinks the deflection of each spring (a measure of the force) would be the pulling load divided by number of spring scales. Nope. Each spring scale would measure the same. If you have two spring scales at home, you can easily verify this. Or, if we break the chain and put one spring scale between two adjacent links, the measured force will be equal to the applied load. However, if we break the chain in two places, methinks the measured force will be half the applied load. If the force were equal to the applied load on each link, I would expect the two spring scales to also indicate a force equal to the applied load, which I don't believe is the case. I'll try a couple other explanations. First, you can find tables of tensile strength for various sizes of roller chain. You'll note that the tables don't specify length. That tensile strength depends on several factors, but not length. If what you're visualizing were true, they'd have to specify length. Second, if what you visualize were true, let's take a chain with an ultimate strength of (say) 5000 pounds. Would that apply to one link (say, 1/2")? If so, would two links (say, 1") be able to hold 10,000 pounds? Would 10 inches of chain be able to hold 100,000 pounds? Would 100" of chain hold a million pounds? You see that it quickly becomes absurd. Under static and otherwise ordinary and reasonable conditions, the length doesn't matter. Tension in a chain is constant over its length. Same is true for ropes, cables, etc. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brake pad efficiency | [email protected] | Techniques | 87 | February 7th 16 01:55 AM |
1897 bicycle gear efficiency testing in "Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers" | [email protected] | Techniques | 0 | December 7th 08 05:11 AM |
So you may wonder why there are even 10% mechanical watches stillmanufactured today. Mechanical watches tend to have a longer lifespan thanquartz watches, and with the proper care and servicing can be handed down forgenerations. You will often find m | [email protected] | General | 0 | April 23rd 08 08:10 PM |
Bumps and efficiency | SYJ | Techniques | 16 | July 3rd 06 10:21 PM |
Durability vs Efficiency | Jim Edgar | General | 6 | July 24th 03 12:06 AM |