It's Tuesday

On Nov 16, 9:32*pm, Phil H wrote:

Not really, if you look at it from a purely financial aspect; what is
the potential return on investment versus financial loss if found
guilty?

Or look at it another way - LANCE got ~$2 million for appearing at the
Tour Down Under, so he basically did the race for free. Horrors.

A million ain't what it used to be.

R

On 11/16/2011 6:32 PM, Phil H wrote:

On a more personal level, you of all people shouldn't be questioning
overuse of resources for an arguably questionable quest. Of course, an
obsessive personality motive is far less attractive to you than your
implication of guilt.

Perfect.

On 11/16/2011 12:28 AM, Simply Fred wrote:
Jimmy July wrote:
If the prosecution finds a way to get Ollie North on the stand,
Armstrong's in BIG trouble.

The plot thickens. I suspect Ollie North bought dope from Gewiss to sell
to Iranian olympic cyclists in the late eighties in order to fund US
Postal's rise in the nineties. It can thus be proven that Armstrong was
also involved in The Iran-Contra affair in addition to the Kennedy
assassination and Whitewater.


Oliver North ... Oliver Stone? Coincidence? Time will tell.

On Nov 16, 6:43*pm, BL wrote:

This is far, far beyond being an FDA investigation. Even if it wasn't, I
interpret this kind of expenditure for legal services by a person
claiming to be innocent of any wrongdoing to be a total disconnect.

They're bringing their big guns-- and worse, the loose cannons ("that
would be Novitsky").

I think the standard warning is "you'd better bring the best defense
you can afford" when you go to court, for any reason-- or, better yet
(often if not always), hire the best you can and stay out of court.

Or, are you hoping Lance won't fight hard, and lose? g Chip, chip,
chip, Brian.
--D-y

On 11/17/2011 2:22 PM, --D-y wrote:
On Nov 16, 6:43 pm, wrote:

This is far, far beyond being an FDA investigation. Even if it wasn't, I
interpret this kind of expenditure for legal services by a person
claiming to be innocent of any wrongdoing to be a total disconnect.

They're bringing their big guns-- and worse, the loose cannons ("that
would be Novitsky").

I think the standard warning is "you'd better bring the best defense
you can afford" when you go to court, for any reason-- or, better yet
(often if not always), hire the best you can and stay out of court.

Or, are you hoping Lance won't fight hard, and lose?g Chip, chip,
chip, Brian.
--D-y
I hope he fights as hard as he can--to his last penny. Make his defense
counsel wealthier than they already are.

On Nov 17, 4:32*pm, BL wrote:
On 11/17/2011 2:22 PM, --D-y wrote:



On Nov 16, 6:43 pm, *wrote:

This is far, far beyond being an FDA investigation. Even if it wasn't, I
interpret this kind of expenditure for legal services by a person
claiming to be innocent of any wrongdoing to be a total disconnect.

They're bringing their big guns-- and worse, the loose cannons ("that
would be Novitsky").

I think the standard warning is "you'd better bring the best defense
you can afford" when you go to court, for any reason-- or, better yet
(often if not always), hire the best you can and stay out of court.

Or, are you hoping Lance won't fight hard, and lose?g *Chip, chip,
chip, Brian.
--D-y

I hope he fights as hard as he can--to his last penny. Make his defense
counsel wealthier than they already are.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Worth every penny if it maintains his current reputation and as
someone else pointed out, will be recouped with a couple of appearance
payments. Phil H

Jimmy July wrote:
If the prosecution finds a way to get Ollie North on the stand,
Armstrong's in BIG trouble.

Simply Fred wrote:
The plot thickens. I suspect Ollie North bought dope from Gewiss to sell
to Iranian olympic cyclists in the late eighties in order to fund US
Postal's rise in the nineties. It can thus be proven that Armstrong was
also involved in The Iran-Contra affair in addition to the Kennedy
assassination and Whitewater.

Jimmy July wrote:
Oliver North ... Oliver Stone? Coincidence? Time will tell.

Oh yes, I forgot HE is also developing a HAARP variant in order to cause
earthquakes in France. That is the reason for the high water usage at
HIS Texas home.

On 11/15/2011 04:49 PM, BL wrote:
On 11/15/2011 11:47 AM, dave a wrote:
On 11/15/2011 5:36 AM, Brad Anders wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/arms...federal-battle



Looks like Laff's Tuesday may be coming soon. Or not.

The entire story is devoted to the fact that there is no news to report.
It's definitely Tuesday.
It was apparently begun by Fabiani. It's part of the pr offensive that
is about to take off with the indictments.

There you have it, folks!

Brian says the indictments are "about to take off". It's last January,
all over again!

On 11/17/2011 11:25 PM, Phil H wrote:
On Nov 17, 4:32 pm, wrote:
On 11/17/2011 2:22 PM, --D-y wrote:



On Nov 16, 6:43 pm, wrote:

This is far, far beyond being an FDA investigation. Even if it wasn't, I
interpret this kind of expenditure for legal services by a person
claiming to be innocent of any wrongdoing to be a total disconnect.

They're bringing their big guns-- and worse, the loose cannons ("that
would be Novitsky").

I think the standard warning is "you'd better bring the best defense
you can afford" when you go to court, for any reason-- or, better yet
(often if not always), hire the best you can and stay out of court.

Or, are you hoping Lance won't fight hard, and lose?g Chip, chip,
chip, Brian.
--D-y

I hope he fights as hard as he can--to his last penny. Make his defense
counsel wealthier than they already are.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Worth every penny if it maintains his current reputation and as
someone else pointed out, will be recouped with a couple of appearance
payments. Phil H
It won't happen that way.

On 11/18/2011 2:46 PM, Jimmy July wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:49 PM, BL wrote:
On 11/15/2011 11:47 AM, dave a wrote:
On 11/15/2011 5:36 AM, Brad Anders wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/arms...federal-battle




Looks like Laff's Tuesday may be coming soon. Or not.

The entire story is devoted to the fact that there is no news to report.
It's definitely Tuesday.
It was apparently begun by Fabiani. It's part of the pr offensive that
is about to take off with the indictments.

There you have it, folks!

Brian says the indictments are "about to take off". It's last January,
all over again!
I think it will be early next year for indictments. Nobody wants to
indict and start a major case during the holiday period.