|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
My friend just returned from Italy on a tour up the entire length of the east coast.
He visited the factory that built his and his wife's custom steel frames. They also build carbon fiber frames and sponsor a Pro team. When Mike asked them about their reliability the company official that was showing them around said that he would not recommend ANYONE buying a carbon fiber frameset.. He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Global Cycling Network has performed a series of tests of carbon handlebars vs aluminum. What they discovered should come as no surprise to anyone - carbon has four or five times the fatigue resistance of aluminum. So under loads that are at or under their designed strength they have a much longer life than aluminum. However, at loads above their designed strength carbon fiber will break whereas aluminum tends to bend instead of break. What this means is that a properly designed and manufactured carbon fiber bike should have four or more times the lifespan of an aluminum frameset designed to the same limits. There is only one thing wrong with this theory - carbon fiber construction has a number of problems - they can be build more easily with flaws than can aluminum or steel bikes and since everyone is going for the lightest possible bikes these days, the design of carbon bikes and their strength isn't known closely enough to be as reliable as necessary. So if you're Joe Modern and want a super-light carbon frame be honest with yourself and realize that your bike could break and it could occur at the worst possible times. If you're a Pro racer it is your business to be competitive at the highest levels. If you are not perhaps another material may be more appropriate. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On 7/5/2019 4:33 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
My friend just returned from Italy on a tour up the entire length of the east coast. He visited the factory that built his and his wife's custom steel frames. They also build carbon fiber frames and sponsor a Pro team. When Mike asked them about their reliability the company official that was showing them around said that he would not recommend ANYONE buying a carbon fiber frameset. He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Global Cycling Network has performed a series of tests of carbon handlebars vs aluminum. What they discovered should come as no surprise to anyone - carbon has four or five times the fatigue resistance of aluminum. So under loads that are at or under their designed strength they have a much longer life than aluminum. However, at loads above their designed strength carbon fiber will break whereas aluminum tends to bend instead of break. What this means is that a properly designed and manufactured carbon fiber bike should have four or more times the lifespan of an aluminum frameset designed to the same limits. There is only one thing wrong with this theory - carbon fiber construction has a number of problems - they can be build more easily with flaws than can aluminum or steel bikes and since everyone is going for the lightest possible bikes these days, the design of carbon bikes and their strength isn't known closely enough to be as reliable as necessary. So if you're Joe Modern and want a super-light carbon frame be honest with yourself and realize that your bike could break and it could occur at the worst possible times. If you're a Pro racer it is your business to be competitive at the highest levels. If you are not perhaps another material may be more appropriate. We almost never see modern aluminum race bars bent, they just snap. Back when they were thicker and less tempered they bent, but that's over for race quality bars now. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On 7/5/2019 9:33 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 7/5/2019 4:33 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: My friend just returned from Italy on a tour up the entire length of the east coast. He visited the factory that built his and his wife's custom steel frames. They also build carbon fiber frames and sponsor a Pro team. When Mike asked them about their reliability the company official that was showing them around said that he would not recommend ANYONE buying a carbon fiber frameset. He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Global Cycling Network has performed a series of tests of carbon handlebars vs aluminum. What they discovered should come as no surprise to anyone - carbon has four or five times the fatigue resistance of aluminum. So under loads that are at or under their designed strength they have a much longer life than aluminum. However, at loads above their designed strength carbon fiber will break whereas aluminum tends to bend instead of break. What this means is that a properly designed and manufactured carbon fiber bike should have four or more times the lifespan of an aluminum frameset designed to the same limits. There is only one thing wrong with this theory - carbon fiber construction has a number of problems - they can be build more easily with flaws than can aluminum or steel bikes and since everyone is going for the lightest possible bikes these days, the design of carbon bikes and their strength isn't known closely enough to be as reliable as necessary. So if you're Joe Modern and want a super-light carbon frame be honest with yourself and realize that your bike could break and it could occur at the worst possible times. If you're a Pro racer it is your business to be competitive at the highest levels. If you are not perhaps another material may be more appropriate. We almost never see modern aluminum race bars bent, they just snap. Back when they were thicker and less tempered they bent, but that's over for race quality bars now. It seems it's almost a law of nature that the higher the strength, the lower the ductility. Often, that means the less warning before fracture. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 4:33:54 PM UTC-5, Tom Kunich wrote:
He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Nonsense. There are 5 to 8 riders on each team at every race. So after every single rice/race, the bikes would need to be stripped and rebuilt with a new frame. We think of pro racing teams as being bottomless pits of money. But they are not. They have budgets and expenses and try to turn a profit. Every pro team would need to hire 2-3-4 extra mechanics permanently just to rebuild and strip frame after every single ride. This would be an extra half million dollars added to the budget. I know that sounds like a piddle amount to rich folks. But it adds up quickly. Half the pro bike teams would be out of business because they cannot stand that kind of expense. And pro bike sponsors would also stop sponsoring because giving away thousands of frames for free every year would not be worth the cost. I encourage you trumpians to at least add some believability to your lies. At least make your lies close or within sight of the truth. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 12:31:36 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 4:33:54 PM UTC-5, Tom Kunich wrote: He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Nonsense. There are 5 to 8 riders on each team at every race. So after every single rice/race, the bikes would need to be stripped and rebuilt with a new frame. We think of pro racing teams as being bottomless pits of money. But they are not. They have budgets and expenses and try to turn a profit. Every pro team would need to hire 2-3-4 extra mechanics permanently just to rebuild and strip frame after every single ride. This would be an extra half million dollars added to the budget. I know that sounds like a piddle amount to rich folks. But it adds up quickly. Half the pro bike teams would be out of business because they cannot stand that kind of expense. And pro bike sponsors would also stop sponsoring because giving away thousands of frames for free every year would not be worth the cost. I encourage you trumpians to at least add some believability to your lies. At least make your lies close or within sight of the truth. Why don't you tell us all how long you've been making bicycles? Seems to me that only a moron will tell us that the factory doesn't know what they're talking about. So how long have you been making bicycles and of what materials? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 6:33:37 PM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 7/5/2019 4:33 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: My friend just returned from Italy on a tour up the entire length of the east coast. He visited the factory that built his and his wife's custom steel frames. They also build carbon fiber frames and sponsor a Pro team. When Mike asked them about their reliability the company official that was showing them around said that he would not recommend ANYONE buying a carbon fiber frameset. He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Global Cycling Network has performed a series of tests of carbon handlebars vs aluminum. What they discovered should come as no surprise to anyone - carbon has four or five times the fatigue resistance of aluminum. So under loads that are at or under their designed strength they have a much longer life than aluminum. However, at loads above their designed strength carbon fiber will break whereas aluminum tends to bend instead of break. What this means is that a properly designed and manufactured carbon fiber bike should have four or more times the lifespan of an aluminum frameset designed to the same limits. There is only one thing wrong with this theory - carbon fiber construction has a number of problems - they can be build more easily with flaws than can aluminum or steel bikes and since everyone is going for the lightest possible bikes these days, the design of carbon bikes and their strength isn't known closely enough to be as reliable as necessary. So if you're Joe Modern and want a super-light carbon frame be honest with yourself and realize that your bike could break and it could occur at the worst possible times. If you're a Pro racer it is your business to be competitive at the highest levels. If you are not perhaps another material may be more appropriate. We almost never see modern aluminum race bars bent, they just snap. Back when they were thicker and less tempered they bent, but that's over for race quality bars now. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 I went back and watched a couple of the carbon vs aluminum bars. He showed a fairly large number of carbon bars with voids and failures ranging from visible to total failures. Then he began talking about aluminum bars. He said that for a while they were making ultra-light aluminum bars weighing in at 200 grams. He said that they didn't even bother with inspecting the bars but replaced them yearly because they would have catastrophic failures. He then said that now they make the bars 250 grams. I assumed from his statements that they were a hell of a lot more reliable because of the 25% additional weight. After what I saw in those video's it sort of gives me the willies about any ultralight bars. No problem since the Chinese CF bars are somewhat heavier than the expensive ones. Another video compared the American made Enve carbon rims with the Chinese. The Enve had what I'd consider a slightly better shape but it also had some visible voids. They did not appear to be in areas that are important but a crash may disable the bike because of that. So in regard to your posting - perhaps the bars you've been seeing fail were the ultralights and not the newer. The failure of all of his stack of carbon bars certainly couldn't give you confidence in carrying on after a crash. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote: On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 12:31:36 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 4:33:54 PM UTC-5, Tom Kunich wrote: He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Nonsense. There are 5 to 8 riders on each team at every race. So after every single rice/race, the bikes would need to be stripped and rebuilt with a new frame. We think of pro racing teams as being bottomless pits of money. But they are not. They have budgets and expenses and try to turn a profit. Every pro team would need to hire 2-3-4 extra mechanics permanently just to rebuild and strip frame after every single ride. This would be an extra half million dollars added to the budget. I know that sounds like a piddle amount to rich folks. But it adds up quickly. Half the pro bike teams would be out of business because they cannot stand that kind of expense. And pro bike sponsors would also stop sponsoring because giving away thousands of frames for free every year would not be worth the cost. I encourage you trumpians to at least add some believability to your lies. At least make your lies close or within sight of the truth. Why don't you tell us all how long you've been making bicycles? Seems to me that only a moron will tell us that the factory doesn't know what they're talking about. So how long have you been making bicycles and of what materials? You seem to be saying that something that what someone told you that somebody else said must the truth, and all of the truth, but in reality the real question is not what someone says that someone else says but what is happening in real life. Do T de F teams actually change frames, for every team member, every race? Perhaps they do but to date I haven't read any reports by bicycle reporters to that effect and I would think that it might be of great interest to the bicycling world that this was happening. But perhaps all the bicycling reporters are being bribed to not report such truths by a conspiracy of all the carbon frame makers who pay them large sums of money to ignore the truth. -- cheers, John B. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 3:26:03 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 12:31:36 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 4:33:54 PM UTC-5, Tom Kunich wrote: He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Nonsense. There are 5 to 8 riders on each team at every race. So after every single rice/race, the bikes would need to be stripped and rebuilt with a new frame. We think of pro racing teams as being bottomless pits of money. But they are not. They have budgets and expenses and try to turn a profit. Every pro team would need to hire 2-3-4 extra mechanics permanently just to rebuild and strip frame after every single ride. This would be an extra half million dollars added to the budget. I know that sounds like a piddle amount to rich folks. But it adds up quickly. Half the pro bike teams would be out of business because they cannot stand that kind of expense. And pro bike sponsors would also stop sponsoring because giving away thousands of frames for free every year would not be worth the cost. I encourage you trumpians to at least add some believability to your lies. At least make your lies close or within sight of the truth. Why don't you tell us all how long you've been making bicycles? Seems to me that only a moron will tell us that the factory doesn't know what they're talking about. So how long have you been making bicycles and of what materials? You seem to be saying that something that what someone told you that somebody else said must the truth, and all of the truth, but in reality the real question is not what someone says that someone else says but what is happening in real life. Do T de F teams actually change frames, for every team member, every race? Perhaps they do but to date I haven't read any reports by bicycle reporters to that effect and I would think that it might be of great interest to the bicycling world that this was happening. But perhaps all the bicycling reporters are being bribed to not report such truths by a conspiracy of all the carbon frame makers who pay them large sums of money to ignore the truth. -- cheers, John B. You have just lost the ability to ever pretend that you were an engineer. If you haven't watched the actual tests of aluminum and carbon fiber parts on YouTube you've shown exactly what a dope you are. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On 7/7/19 6:50 am, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 12:31:36 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 4:33:54 PM UTC-5, Tom Kunich wrote: He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Nonsense. There are 5 to 8 riders on each team at every race. So after every single rice/race, the bikes would need to be stripped and rebuilt with a new frame. We think of pro racing teams as being bottomless pits of money. But they are not. They have budgets and expenses and try to turn a profit. Every pro team would need to hire 2-3-4 extra mechanics permanently just to rebuild and strip frame after every single ride. This would be an extra half million dollars added to the budget. I know that sounds like a piddle amount to rich folks. But it adds up quickly. Half the pro bike teams would be out of business because they cannot stand that kind of expense. And pro bike sponsors would also stop sponsoring because giving away thousands of frames for free every year would not be worth the cost. I encourage you trumpians to at least add some believability to your lies. At least make your lies close or within sight of the truth. Why don't you tell us all how long you've been making bicycles? Seems to me that only a moron will tell us that the factory doesn't know what they're talking about. So how long have you been making bicycles and of what materials? Most of them have two bikes. A frame may be discarded after a serious crash or at the end of a season. Generally not before. Certainly not after every race. -- JS |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon Frame Reliability
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 4:56:54 PM UTC-7, James wrote:
On 7/7/19 6:50 am, Tom Kunich wrote: On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 12:31:36 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 4:33:54 PM UTC-5, Tom Kunich wrote: He said that pro teams replace their framesets generally each race because they cannot take the chance injuring a rider with a failure. This is a famous Italian marque that has made bicycles since 1957. So the opinion of the factory should bear some weight. Nonsense. There are 5 to 8 riders on each team at every race. So after every single rice/race, the bikes would need to be stripped and rebuilt with a new frame. We think of pro racing teams as being bottomless pits of money. But they are not. They have budgets and expenses and try to turn a profit. Every pro team would need to hire 2-3-4 extra mechanics permanently just to rebuild and strip frame after every single ride. This would be an extra half million dollars added to the budget. I know that sounds like a piddle amount to rich folks. But it adds up quickly. Half the pro bike teams would be out of business because they cannot stand that kind of expense. And pro bike sponsors would also stop sponsoring because giving away thousands of frames for free every year would not be worth the cost. I encourage you trumpians to at least add some believability to your lies. At least make your lies close or within sight of the truth. Why don't you tell us all how long you've been making bicycles? Seems to me that only a moron will tell us that the factory doesn't know what they're talking about. So how long have you been making bicycles and of what materials? Most of them have two bikes. A frame may be discarded after a serious crash or at the end of a season. Generally not before. Certainly not after every race. -- JS The actual sponsor of a Pro Team said that is what they do. Where are you getting your information from? My pal, a retired NCIS lead agent talked directly to the company that sponsors a pro team. I have every confidence that he would ask the correct questions and report the correct answers. After all, that was his business for 30 years. Now I did take that to mean that after every pro race and not every Grand Tour stage. But after what I watched today in the Tour de France it seemed to me like they would throw most of those frames that crashed away instantly.. Even getting a flat now they change bikes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carbon Forks Reliability = paranoia or truth? | bfd | Techniques | 94 | March 7th 09 03:34 PM |
Reliability of carbon MTB frames? | Dave | Techniques | 6 | August 16th 08 05:14 PM |
FA: 2003 GIANT TCR 0 CARBON FRAME, CARBON FORK, CARBON CAGES AND COMPUTER | Phil, Squid-in-Training | Marketplace | 0 | January 21st 05 03:07 PM |
Orbea Lobular Carbon frame/Zeus FCM carbon fork/integrated headset | Jonathan Page | Marketplace | 0 | August 8th 04 08:49 PM |
Steel Frame vs Aluminum Frame w/ Carbon seat stays and carbon fork | ydm9 | General | 6 | April 12th 04 09:42 PM |