|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#931
|
|||
|
|||
special license should be required for SUVs
chuck wrote: I think nothing else needs to be said. I've been saying for years that penalties for reckless driving should vary with the listed weight of the vehicle. That would promp drivers to not buy the huge SUVs and if they did, to drive them carefully. If you say are caught doing 80 in a 60 in a 2000 pound car, you pay a $500. Do the same in a 6000 pound 'Burb and the fine is $2500 and license suspension for 6 months. Stop coddling these killers. They need to do as in some european countries. The cost of the ticket should be based on the driver's income. In most cases, the resulting fine would have the same effect. A 500 bucks ticket ($100,000 for Donald Trump) for zigzaging around normal cars would be a good lesson for the SUV. Also special license should be required for SUVs, tougher regulations (no phone for sure) and lower bumper. (And no bumper stickers "We support our troops.") |
Ads |
#932
|
|||
|
|||
yet another argument in favor of THE REVOLUTION
Floyd Rogers wrote: "chuck" wrote wrote: I've been saying for years that penalties for reckless driving should vary with the listed weight of the vehicle. That would promp drivers to not buy the huge SUVs and if they did, to drive them carefully. If you say are caught doing 80 in a 60 in a 2000 pound car, you pay a $500. Do the same in a 6000 pound 'Burb and the fine is $2500 and license suspension for 6 months. Stop coddling these killers. They need to do as in some european countries. The cost of the ticket should be based on the driver's income. In most cases, the resulting fine would have the same effect. 1) you're responding to a troll 2) that would definitely violate the "...cruel and unusual..." provisions. OK, bring on the definition of troll, and if you prove it applies to me, I won't be posting at this forum again. The same thing happened to the Black Sheep who was expelled by some of the regular sheep because they thought the predator in sheep's clothing was their friend. Of course, the predator also gave them special treatment and didn't fleece them that often. |
#933
|
|||
|
|||
special license should be required for SUVs
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:45:03 -0700, donquijote1954 wrote:
Also special license should be required for SUVs, tougher regulations (no phone for sure) and lower bumper. (And no bumper stickers "We support our troops.") How about a sticker that says "Our troops support this gas-guzzler". -- David L. Johnson __o | "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored _`\(,_ | by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." --Ralph Waldo (_)/ (_) | Emerson |
#934
|
|||
|
|||
special license should be required for SUVs
David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:45:03 -0700, donquijote1954 wrote: Also special license should be required for SUVs, tougher regulations (no phone for sure) and lower bumper. (And no bumper stickers "We support our troops.") How about a sticker that says "Our troops support this gas-guzzler". Yeah, at least they would be more honest. It would explain WHY they support our troops. |
#935
|
|||
|
|||
get bumper sticker
donquijote1954 wrote: David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:45:03 -0700, donquijote1954 wrote: Also special license should be required for SUVs, tougher regulations (no phone for sure) and lower bumper. (And no bumper stickers "We support our troops.") How about a sticker that says "Our troops support this gas-guzzler". Yeah, at least they would be more honest. It would explain WHY they support our troops. Here's a bumper stickers for those whose patriotism shows by burning oil... "Draft SUV drivers first" http://www.stickergiant.com/page/sg/PROD/fundri/b5634 |
#936
|
|||
|
|||
"put something fun between your legs"
On 9 Aug 2006 10:45:04 -0700, "donquijote1954"
wrote: I hope they don't say something like "put something fun between your legs"... (that's already mine) Wrong. That is MY saying and I have it copyrighted. I even have it tattooed right above my wife's ****. For the price of $5,000,000 I will sell you the copyright. |
#938
|
|||
|
|||
THE GOLDEN RULE
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:18:16 -0500, against all advice, something
compelled Kevan Smith , to say: There's really no reason to eat meat other than taste. You say that like that's not a good enough reason. |
#939
|
|||
|
|||
THE GOLDEN RULE
"Steve Daniels" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:18:16 -0500, against all advice, something compelled Kevan Smith , to say: There's really no reason to eat meat other than taste. You say that like that's not a good enough reason. Animals have a place in my world. On the plate next to the potatoes. G I'm a member of PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals. But then there are those of us that are supposed to eat 8 oz of meat a day and can't eat the subsitutes for whatever reason. Really, I'm against animal cruelty, but the people at PETA are way too far to the LEFT on this one. Charles of Schaumburg |
#940
|
|||
|
|||
THE GOLDEN RULE
"Steve Daniels" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:18:16 -0500, against all advice, something compelled Kevan Smith , to say: There's really no reason to eat meat other than taste. You say that like that's not a good enough reason. Cats, the other white meat. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|