|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's
the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe), the reckless talk on the phone, the driving of monster vehicles with raised bumpers that can kill above the protection area of any other car, the insurance companies that fail to make those guilty ones pay for every loss they cause, and so many other areas in which the government and organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Drivers are totally indifferent. In the meantime the jungle continues out there... "It's No Accident: The Real Story Behind Senseless Death and Injury on Our Roads" by Lisa Lewis Description: For more than 30 years, the government has been ramming cars into walls in an effort to make car crashes safe. The public has been conditioned to believe that seatbelts, airbags and more "crashworthy" vehicles are the best ways to protect us from harm on the roads. Meanwhile, the most basic strategies to deter dangerous driving and prevent crashes have been ignored. "It's No Accident" provides a rare glimpse into how the government got seduced by the promise of "safe crashing." It then examines the major factors involved in crashes today, including speeding, aggressive driving, distractions (e.g. cell phones) and drowsy driving. The author reveals that many dangerous behaviors are now promoted by businesses, and that drivers who kill often walk away with just a small fine. This expose is a must-read for anyone concerned about what's happening on our roads and how to stop it. Reviews: Interesting ... 2 Dec 2005 (updated 15 Dec 2005) by John This book is a very nuanced discussion of the problems of road safety. The author challenges the government, the insurance industry, the auto industry, the media, the motorists, and even Mothers Against Drunk Driving to defend the outrageous and immoral behavior that we're seeing on the roads today -- and the degree to which they are contributing to it. It is a no-holds barred expose that reveals the hard truths about behaviors and policies that put innocent people at risk on the roads. Right on Target [ No Rating ] 10 Jan 2006 by falconer I ordered three books from the vendor and requested that my order be mailed by federal express (it was a cost of $14.00). They indicated that I would receive the books on the following Tuesday and I did. I was pleased with the service. I would like to compliment you for a book that is well written. I have not looked at car safety as much from the crash prevention but from crash mitigation. You are so on target. The book needs to be read by many, I am trying to encourage everyone I know to read it. I have about twenty pages left. I can feel your frustration....... and I really agreed at how you look at MADD it is not only drinking but it is speed,following too close and of course those cell phones users. I will be sending your organization more money by the end of the week ( I made a pledge of 50.00)./ MADD should listen to all of the accidents included fatal ones that happen everyday in the morning as people are going to work......... http://www.lulu.com/content/186268 WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote BIKE FOR PEACE http://webspawner.com/users/bikeforpeace |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
That's right, what passes for safety these days is nothing more than
accident survival. The emphisis needs to return to accident prevention and the enforcement of lane integrity laws. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
donquijote1954 wrote:
(passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe) Funny, I thought the UK was in Europe. -- Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:19:25 -0400, "BE" wrote:
That's right, what passes for safety these days is nothing more than accident survival. The emphisis needs to return to accident prevention and the enforcement of lane integrity laws. ANd we can put that emphisis on just AFTER we get rid of the SPAMMERs such as the original poster who is just flogging his books. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
On 28 Sep 2006 13:09:31 -0700, "donquijote1954"
wrote: There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe), There is nothing wrong with passing on the right. Period. I wish to hell people would stop coming up with this stuff. What Europe does is non-relavent in the USA. This silly law was repealed 30+ years ago here when we began building our interstates with left exits, among other things that included everyone being infuriated at someone in the left lane doing the SL - 10 mph and then getting a ticket for passing the SOB. Dave Head |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
Dave Head wrote:
On 28 Sep 2006 13:09:31 -0700, "donquijote1954" wrote: There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe), There is nothing wrong with passing on the right. Period. Sure there is. In an environment where people are used to others driving correctly (i.e. not the USA,) they're not expecting to be passed on the right. Doing something that other drivers don't expect increases risk, however slightly. I wish to hell people would stop coming up with this stuff. What Europe does is non-relavent in the USA. This silly law was repealed 30+ years ago here when we began building our interstates with left exits, among other things that included everyone being infuriated at someone in the left lane doing the SL - 10 mph and then getting a ticket for passing the SOB. Dave Head The correct solution is to not have left exits and to enforce lane discipline laws, and then this discussion will be irrelevant. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
Dave Head wrote: On 28 Sep 2006 13:09:31 -0700, "donquijote1954" wrote: There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe), There is nothing wrong with passing on the right. Period. Most highways in North America have signs that say "Slower traffic keep right" seems to inidicate that we should pass on the Left. Bg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
"Nate Nagel" wrote in message ... Dave Head wrote: On 28 Sep 2006 13:09:31 -0700, "donquijote1954" wrote: There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe), There is nothing wrong with passing on the right. Period. Sure there is. In an environment where people are used to others driving correctly (i.e. not the USA,) they're not expecting to be passed on the right. Doing something that other drivers don't expect increases risk, however slightly. I wish to hell people would stop coming up with this stuff. What Europe does is non-relavent in the USA. This silly law was repealed 30+ years ago here when we began building our interstates with left exits, among other things that included everyone being infuriated at someone in the left lane doing the SL - 10 mph and then getting a ticket for passing the SOB. Dave Head The correct solution is to not have left exits and to enforce lane discipline laws, and then this discussion will be irrelevant. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel Go drive down the Eisenhower I-290 between 1st and Austin and tell me that again. I don't have to. I've done it many times. I've got off at both Austin and Harlem and also got ON at both streets, and they are both off and ON on the left. And as far as I know, we still drive on the Right side of the road here. Charles of Schaumburg. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
donquijote1954 wrote:
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe) Call-sign of the LLB: criticism of "passing on the right". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled
n5hsr wrote: "Nate Nagel" wrote in message ... Dave Head wrote: On 28 Sep 2006 13:09:31 -0700, "donquijote1954" wrote: There's much more than drunk drivers that need to be controlled. It's the whole system that needs to be changed. The License to Kill given to absolute beginners, the lack of lane discipline (passing on the right, something unheard of in Europe), There is nothing wrong with passing on the right. Period. Sure there is. In an environment where people are used to others driving correctly (i.e. not the USA,) they're not expecting to be passed on the right. Doing something that other drivers don't expect increases risk, however slightly. I wish to hell people would stop coming up with this stuff. What Europe does is non-relavent in the USA. This silly law was repealed 30+ years ago here when we began building our interstates with left exits, among other things that included everyone being infuriated at someone in the left lane doing the SL - 10 mph and then getting a ticket for passing the SOB. Dave Head The correct solution is to not have left exits and to enforce lane discipline laws, and then this discussion will be irrelevant. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel Go drive down the Eisenhower I-290 between 1st and Austin and tell me that again. I don't have to. I've done it many times. I've got off at both Austin and Harlem and also got ON at both streets, and they are both off and ON on the left. And as far as I know, we still drive on the Right side of the road here. Whoever designed the Ike/Harlem [1] interchange should be committed. Entering the Ike when the traffic is heavy but moving fast (daytime, off rush hour) is a gamble - put your foot down and hope there is an opening in traffic before the merging lane ends. [1] http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?T=4&S=10&Z=16&X=2166&Y=23180&W=2&qs=har lem%7criver+forest%7cil%7c&Addr=N+Harlem+Ave%2c+Ri ver+Forest%2c+IL+60305&ALon=-87.8055720&ALat=41.9034257. -- Tom "Ex FIB" Sherman - Here, not there. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4 Wheel Drive(r)s | jh | Australia | 4 | August 2nd 06 11:27 AM |
The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True | harbinger | Australia | 7 | June 4th 06 02:43 PM |
What we always suspected - 4WD drivers obese, conservative: study | Jimbo Jones | Australia | 8 | September 28th 05 12:46 AM |
Cyclist rant: back in black | John | UK | 1099 | March 18th 05 11:09 AM |
Dangerous Drivers Idea | Anthony | Australia | 49 | September 4th 04 03:10 AM |