|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
Tom Keats wrote:
In article , Bill Baka writes: You could have always used the football move and straight armed one in the throat, clothes lined him. Besides being dangerous to the rider, that's a pretty harsh and excessive approach that could inflict a hell of a lot more injury than is deserved or warranted. In fact, I'd say it would smack of Road Rage. There's already more than enough of people hurtin' other people going on in the world. A fair fight is one thing, but something that's tantamount to a sucker punch is ... sans honeur. That would have put a stop to that as long as it didn't take you off the bike and you would have 2 to deal with. I have an excess of adrenalin, and it comes out in the presence of idiots. I doubt the adrenalin excuse would be accepted in court. Not for everyone. Certainly not for me. cheers, Tom My only excuse is my age and I am way tired of smart assed teen aged jerks in groups. Road rage probably defines it. Bill |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
Ziactrice wrote: How do you rank the most common dangers you encounter by risk? Meaning not just severity (cars!) but frequency (kids!). I'm not yet riding on the Real Roads, but when I do I suppose I'll be missing that nasty little dog in comparison to the traffic. According to the most prominent book dealing with this subject, _Effective Cycling_ by John Forester, here are the rough figures for causes of bike injuries to club cyclists ... all reported injuries, and "serious" injuries (although if you track down the actual research data, you'll see the definition of "serious" is rather low): Percent all Percent serious Falls 50% 31% Car-bike collisions 17% 26% Bike- bike collisions 17% 13% Bike-dog collisions 8% 10% All other 8% 15% For the record, I'm trusting my penciled-in notes for the "Serious" figures. I've got the original paper here, but it's buried. - Frank Krygowski |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
First thing to do is to get over the question of whose fault it is, and how
big a moron the owner is. The object is to not fall of the bike or get bitten. You did the exact right thing for not falling off. When you hear or see Spot tearing off you, immediately dismount and put the bicycle between you and the darling doggie. I had been then going through a two part routine. The first part was to shout at the dog, to help him get over the idea that you are afraid of him and therefore someone he can bite with impunity. This will often get the dog to stop at a distance and bark threateningly. The problem with this situation is that the dog will resume his attack and from a lot closer if you attempt to remount and ride away. Which means that you have to drive him away. I used to keep a 20" long one-inch thick dowel on the down tube of my bike. I would brandish this and RUN toward the dog shouting loudly and angrily. This would generally convince the dog that he had an appointment somewhere else that needed immediate attending to, and run off. The problem with this approach is that it is strenuous and does not condition the dog to not do it again. I now have a spray bottle of full-strength ammonia in my bottle cage. I can put it on Fido from about 15 feet and the closer he gets the denser a dose he gets. I have not had occasion to use it yet. My theory is that a nose and eyes full of ammonia will condition Fido to regard all bicyclists as dangerous and to be avoided, and not just the one that drove him away once. "Ziactrice" wrote in message oups.com... I did a 55 minute training ride this evening, just shaking into adult bicycling still. I've gotten in about three weeks of riding so far. Two weeks back, I put stirrups on the pedals, because of an old ACL injury - finally getting used to them. So how did I wind up dumping myself in the grass, you ask? Dog. In fact, got charged three times by the same dog, cussed out by the owner of the dog because I made the mistake of trying to herd the nasty little guy back to his even nastier owner (not the dog's fault his owner is a moron, I figure) because she thought I was 'attacking' her dog with my bike. Ummm, yeah, you can't even catch up with the dog in your tennies, you think I can in bike cleats? So, I get cussed, dog eventually loses interest in person standing behind bike telling him authoritatively he is a 'bad dog', 'sit', and 'go home!' (not that he listened), I ride slowly off, watching. Sure enough, he loops around owner and owner's kids, comes back for more fun. I manage to ward him off, but in process, go down in the grass. No injuries, 'cept my pride. Owner left behind in the interim. Dog goes off to another street. I cycle back to owner, tell her 'charged me again, dumped me this time, now he's over on (nearby street's name).' Ride off while owner is gaping because I came back to tell her where her lost dog was. How do you rank the most common dangers you encounter by risk? Meaning not just severity (cars!) but frequency (kids!). I'm not yet riding on the Real Roads, but when I do I suppose I'll be missing that nasty little dog in comparison to the traffic. Zia |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
"A spam midden" - what a great phrase! Kudos.
"Tom Keats" wrote in message ... In article .com, "Ziactrice" writes: How do you rank the most common dangers you encounter by risk? Meaning not just severity (cars!) but frequency (kids!). Well, I'd put jaywalkers right up near, if not the top of the list. I don't know if they think bicycles "don't matter" since bikes are smaller than cars, or if they just don't visually register the presence of oncoming bicycles. And a lot of 'em underestimate the speeds and stopping distances of bikes. cheers, Tom -- -- Nothing is safe from me. Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
Scott L wrote:
Why would anyone train on a multi-use path? The one I'm most familiar with is overrun with kindergarteners on bikes, college students rollerblading, iPodded joggers, construction equipment, neighbors talking, . . . Training on it seems nothing short of remarkably foolish to me. Training on a bike path might indeed be nuts, but I said nothing about training. I use the bike path as a conduit to bypass some dangerous intersections on the way to my favorite roads. It's where I do the warm-up/recovery part of my ride, and amounts to barely 2-3 miles each way. However, it's nowhere near as crowded as the one you describe. Yikes, if it were that overrun with people/equipment I might not use it at all. -JR |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
Add those jackass roller bladers who love to skate with thier back
toward you. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians?
Bill Baka wrote: bill wrote: Tom Keats wrote: In article .com, "Ziactrice" writes: How do you rank the most common dangers you encounter by risk? Meaning not just severity (cars!) but frequency (kids!). Well, I'd put jaywalkers right up near, if not the top of the list. I don't know if they think bicycles "don't matter" since bikes are smaller than cars, or if they just don't visually register the presence of oncoming bicycles. And a lot of 'em underestimate the speeds and stopping distances of bikes. I had a couple Jaywalkers sneer at me just the other day--walked out in front of me when I was about 2 seconds from them. I swerved and went behind them and they made "gosh" sounds. This is in a town in Connecticut (where walkers have absolute rights if they are in a crosswalk) where they were not in the crosswalk--they were just too lazy to either (a) wait for traffic to pass or (b) walk an extra 30 yards to get to the crosswalk. You could have always used the football move and straight armed one in the throat, clothes lined him. That would have put a stop to that as long as it didn't take you off the bike and you would have 2 to deal with. I have an excess of adrenalin, and it comes out in the presence of idiots. Not for everyone. Bill Baka There is a junior-high near where I live and sometimes some of the kids just step out into the road to cross and meander across in a loud obnoxious group, obviously some sort of rebellious power-play to force motorists to stop for them. There is a crosswalk about 10 meters away. I was a stupid teenager once too, so usually I cut them some slack when I am in my car. But when some kids who look like they wished they lived in an inner city instead of the affluent suburb they do live in try to act tough by stepping in front of me to shuffle across the street when I am on my bike, I have more than once thrown a shoulder into one of them. But my vote for the most dangerous obstacle is dogs on those spring-loaded wind up super long leashes. They just run crazy all over the place and their owners are not aware they are risking strangulation for thier dog by means of a speeding cyclist. Joseph |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helmets | Peter | General | 305 | June 4th 05 08:56 AM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 18 | July 16th 04 04:28 AM |
Do bicycles and cars mix? | Dr Engelbert Buxbaum | Social Issues | 546 | January 2nd 04 09:51 PM |
hybrid cars and bikes | Rob F. in Houston | General | 51 | January 2nd 04 01:27 AM |