|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
"lardyninja" wrote in message ... http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ver.5642372.jp In principle, I think the idea is good. Someone has to pay for the roads so howsabout starting with the people who use them? However, the cost of administration would undoubtedly be high and the policing would difficult. And lets not forget that the damage caused to the roads is done by others. In fact, the more I think about it, we should not be paying for this damage by way of council tax, but higher rates of VED should be levied to cover the cost. That way cyclists and pedestrians will not be contributing to the damage to roads caused by vehicles. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
On Sep 14, 10:32*am, lardyninja wrote:
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ment-in-talks-... I don't have a problem with cyclists paying proportionally for the cost of roads. Damage goes with the fourth power of mass, so the equitable tax (ignoring for a moment the fact that cycle roads do not need to be anything like as massive as roads designed to carry motor traffic) whould be something under 10p a year. assuming a mass of 1000kg for a car and 150kg for a bike (actually I think most cars weigh more than 1000kg and most cycles plus rider combinations weigh less than 150kg, but whatever). Unless of course they pro rata from the prevailing rate for the lowest level of CO2 emission in cars, in which case the sum is roughly 1/2000 of £0.00 If the Scottish Assembly can collect a properly proportionate sum without spending several orders of magnitude more on administration than they raise in tax, and can do it in a way that doesn't deter cycling, especially for children travelling to and form school, then they will really have achieved something. -- Guy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
"Just zis Guy, you know?" writes:
On Sep 14, 10:32Â*am, lardyninja wrote: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ment-in-talks-... I don't have a problem with cyclists paying proportionally for the cost of roads. The problem is with the concept of VED being a payment for a service - it's not, it's just another tax. The roads are funded out of general taxation. If you increase taxes associated with bikes then you make cycling relatively more expensive and, all else being equal, make people less likely to do it compared with other forms of transport. The question is what do you want the consequences of your tax policy to be? If you want fewer people to cycle and more to drive - then by all means increase taxes on cylists; but I'm not sure who that benfits. Clearly not cyclists - and in all probability not motorists either, as the roads will tend to be more congested. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sep 14, 10:32 am, lardyninja wrote: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ment-in-talks-... I don't have a problem with cyclists paying proportionally for the cost of roads. Damage goes with the fourth power of mass, so the equitable tax (ignoring for a moment the fact that cycle roads do not need to be anything like as massive as roads designed to carry motor traffic) whould be something under 10p a year. assuming a mass of 1000kg for a car and 150kg for a bike (actually I think most cars weigh more than 1000kg and most cycles plus rider combinations weigh less than 150kg, but whatever). Unless of course they pro rata from the prevailing rate for the lowest level of CO2 emission in cars, in which case the sum is roughly 1/2000 of £0.00 If the Scottish Assembly can collect a properly proportionate sum without spending several orders of magnitude more on administration than they raise in tax, and can do it in a way that doesn't deter cycling, especially for children travelling to and form school, then they will really have achieved something. There are several tax models in existence. There is no need to narrow the choice to one which is proportionate or to that currently applied to motor vehicles. One model, which doesn't have the overhead of registration, is just to require a valid "permit" to be attached to the vehicle. Such "permits" could easily be available from vending machines, high street shops, etc. If the "permit" was to be non-transferable, then it could be designed to self-destruct if removed from a vehicle (similar to the motorway tax vignettes used on cars in Switzerland). Heavy penalties for failure to display a permit could bolster the revenues - as in the London congestion charge, roadside parking charges, etc. Alternatively, roads could be funded from central taxation, with a free-at-the-point-of-use policy for /all/ users (whether by foot, bike, car or bus), similar to the jealously protected NHS. Commercial operators (haulage, bus, etc.) could pay an appropriate commercial rate, similar to the way the TOCs pay for rail use. -- Matt B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
On 14 Sep, 10:32, lardyninja wrote:
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ment-in-talks-... LN The document in question is he http://www.cyclingactionplanforscotland.org/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
lardyninja wrote:
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ver.5642372.jp LN Did anyone read the last line? A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Scottish ministers have no plans to charge cyclists for using the roads in Scotland." So it's just a made up article. A troll I guess by scotland on sunday. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
lardyninja wrote:
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com...ver.5642372.jp The consultation was cancelled before the story went to press. It's not happening. Robin Johnson |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
On Sep 14, 12:55*pm, Matt B wrote:
Alternatively, roads could be funded from central taxation, with a free-at-the-point-of-use policy for /all/ users (whether by foot, bike, car or bus), similar to the jealously protected NHS. *Commercial operators (haulage, bus, etc.) could pay an appropriate commercial rate, similar to the way the TOCs pay for rail use. That is more or less how it works now. Roads are funded out of general taxation, there is no charge per use for most roads, and commercial operators have higher charges and more onerous operating regimes. The only problem is, it results in private motoring being too cheap compared with the costs of provision, with the result that the roads are permanently degraded for all other users. This is further complicated by political machinations on behalf of the incredibly powerful motor lobby. It's almost as if these people have never read the literature on traffic management. -- Guy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Scotland's cycling tax
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:26:56 +0100 someone who may be Rob Horton
wrote this:- So it's just a made up article. A troll I guess by scotland on sunday. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publicati.../05/28093408/7 (in particular question 10) was not produced by Scotland on Sunday. It is worth noting these paragraphs at the end of the SoS article "Peter Hayman, another CAPS board member and the Scottish representative of the Cyclists Touring Club, claimed the tax suggestion was added to the paper without his knowledge. ""I think this went in after we saw the final draft," he said. "The board saw the guts of the document, then the Scottish Government people put it together with some extra quotes, which we never saw. I don't think it should have been there because it distracts from the real question, which is: how do you get more people cycling?" Cyclists already pay far more than their fair share towards the upkeep of the roads. They don't whine about this. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Cycling in Bali! Cycling Tours that offer true off roadmountain bike riding | [email protected] | Mountain Biking | 0 | July 5th 08 05:41 AM |
Amy Gillett Safe Cycling Foundation - Husband asks cycling legend to lend a hand | cfsmtb | Australia | 1 | September 16th 05 06:25 AM |
L.E. Cycling Prints benefit non-profit Cycling Group | Gary Coles | UK | 2 | April 3rd 05 08:59 PM |
Cycling Art prints benefits non-profit Cycling Group | Gary Coles | Unicycling | 0 | April 3rd 05 08:09 PM |
ten year ban for scotland's worst driver | David Martin | UK | 173 | May 25th 04 02:14 AM |