Police plan to use stop and search at Royal Wedding.

Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

What the police seem to forget is that State events such as this are
an affront to all anti-authoritarians, who demand their right to
protest politically against them without the police intervening and
causing trouble.

"...The Met plans to use stop-and-search powers and snatch squads to
prevent trouble at the wedding on April 29. "We will not tolerate
troublemakers who set out with the sole intention of causing disorder
and committing crime," said a police spokeswoman. "Officers will
respond swiftly to anyone seeking to mar this day of national
celebration..."

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...celebration.do

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.(Recently updated).
http://www.zing.icom43.net
One person's democracy is another person's Police State,
where rights are replaced by concessions.

Doug wrote:
Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

What 'daily business' is it that Critical Mass do exactly, Doug?

On 17/04/2011 07:35, Doug wrote:
Yet more police and State provocation?


Its called maintaining public order you idiot.

Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse?

The terror threat will be very high during the wedding & in 2012 due to
the Olympics.

I'm certainly not a monarchist - far from it - but like most normal
people I appreciate that there will be some inconvenience to ensure the
safety of those who do wish to celebrate the wedding.


Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration,

With any luck yes.


which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

You mean the way Critical Mass causes annoyance to those who have no
choice and whose right to go about their daily business is severely
curtailed by a bunch of ****** cyclists?


What the police seem to forget is that State events such as this are
an affront to all anti-authoritarians, who demand their right to
protest politically against them without the police intervening and
causing trouble.

They don't 'forget' **** for brains. They have to maintain public
order. The police don't cause trouble, they prevent it.

"...The Met plans to use stop-and-search powers and snatch squads to
prevent trouble at the wedding on April 29. "We will not tolerate
troublemakers who set out with the sole intention of causing disorder
and committing crime," said a police spokeswoman. "Officers will
respond swiftly to anyone seeking to mar this day of national
celebration..."

Quite right.

My daughter will be on duty as lead paramedic in a MRT PO unit. Despite
being trained specifically to work with police riot shield teams &
equipped with body armour she will be risking injury from
'anti-authoritarians' 'demanding' their 'rights'.

I PREDICT THAT DOUG WILL NEVER PROPERLY ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION.

What would happen if a bomb when off in the middle of a critical mass?
Would you be whinging about 'police & state provocation'? Or 'stopping &
searching innocent people'? Or 'severely curtailing their rights'?

Of course you wouldn't you ****.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

"Doug" wrote in message
...
Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed

I will be asking for all cycles to be kept from the area since they
represent a high security risk, as do their owners.

On 17/04/2011 10:32, The Medway Handyman wrote:
....
I PREDICT THAT DOUG WILL NEVER PROPERLY ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION.

What would happen if a bomb when off in the middle of a critical mass?
Would you be whinging about 'police & state provocation'? Or 'stopping &
searching innocent people'? Or 'severely curtailing their rights'?

He has already said that terrorists wouldn't attack a demonstration as
it would dilute their protest to confuse it with another. So, by Doug
logic, Critical Mass is quite safe from a terrorist attack.

Colin Bignell

On Apr 17, 9:54*am, "Norman Wells" wrote:
Doug wrote:
Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

What 'daily business' is it that Critical Mass do exactly, Doug?

You seem confused, Norman. I was of course referring to the daily
business of ALL road users in London during the Royal Wedding event
and including the business of CM's customarily held procession on the
last Friday of every month, which it has been holding for the last
17years and which the Royal Wedding happens to be intruding upon with
the aid of the police.

-- .
Critical Mass London.
http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk
"Get out of my way you f*ing cyclist"

On Apr 17, 7:35*am, Doug wrote:
Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

What the police seem to forget is that State events such as this are
an affront to all anti-authoritarians, who demand their right to
protest politically against them without the police intervening and
causing trouble.

"...The Met plans to use stop-and-search powers and snatch squads to
prevent trouble at the wedding on April 29. "We will not tolerate
troublemakers who set out with the sole intention of causing disorder
and committing crime," said a police spokeswoman. "Officers will
respond swiftly to anyone seeking to mar this day of national
celebration..."

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-anarchists-pl...

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.(Recently updated).
*http://www.zing.icom43.net
One person's democracy is another person's Police State,
*where rights are replaced by concessions.

A Royal Wedding rehearsel film has been leaked out and it shows the
royals behaving very differently from how they would want us to see
them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kav0FEhtLug

Turk182

On Apr 17, 4:49*pm, Turk182 wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:35*am, Doug wrote:



Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

What the police seem to forget is that State events such as this are
an affront to all anti-authoritarians, who demand their right to
protest politically against them without the police intervening and
causing trouble.

"...The Met plans to use stop-and-search powers and snatch squads to
prevent trouble at the wedding on April 29. "We will not tolerate
troublemakers who set out with the sole intention of causing disorder
and committing crime," said a police spokeswoman. "Officers will
respond swiftly to anyone seeking to mar this day of national
celebration..."

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-anarchists-pl...

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.(Recently updated).
*http://www.zing.icom43.net
One person's democracy is another person's Police State,
*where rights are replaced by concessions.

A Royal Wedding rehearsel film has been leaked out and it shows the
royals behaving very differently from how they would want us to see
them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kav0FEhtLug

Nice one!

Doug.

On Apr 17, 7:35*am, Doug wrote:
Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide with
the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and repass on
public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed

Good, pity we can't have a royal wedding every month then.

by this
totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is bound to
cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter and whose
right to go about their daily business will be severely curtailed.

I didn't realise that pitifulmess went about daily buisness.


What the police seem to forget is that State events such as this are
an affront to all anti-authoritarians,

Oh dear

who demand their right to
protest politically against them without the police intervening and
causing trouble.

Yes it's allways the police causing trouble isn't it, never your
mates.


"...The Met plans to use stop-and-search powers and snatch squads to
prevent trouble at the wedding on April 29. "We will not tolerate
troublemakers who set out with the sole intention of causing disorder
and committing crime," said a police spokeswoman. "Officers will
respond swiftly to anyone seeking to mar this day of national
celebration..."

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-anarchists-pl...

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.(Recently updated).
*http://www.zing.icom43.net
One person's democracy is another person's Police State,
*where rights are replaced by concessions.

I wonder if this event has been made public & the route advertised.
Perhaps if they had just decided to go where they wanted without
telling anybody.
But at least the 'corking' will be legal.

Doug wrote:
On Apr 17, 9:54 am, "Norman Wells" wrote:
Doug wrote:
Yet more police and State provocation? Presumably they will be
stopping and searching innocent people in the process, while using
anti-terror laws as an excuse? Critical Mass happens to coincide
with the Wedding day so it can expect that its right to pass and
repass on public roads in Central London to be severely curtailed
by this totally disproportionate wedding demonstration, which is
bound to cause annoyance to many who have no choice in the matter
and whose right to go about their daily business will be severely
curtailed.

What 'daily business' is it that Critical Mass do exactly, Doug?

You seem confused, Norman. I was of course referring to the daily
business of ALL road users in London during the Royal Wedding

No, you've having an identity crisis.

And a not very good one at that.