#1
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On 01/02/2017 21:40, Simon Mason wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...road-rage.html OK, she's a mouthy bitch, but prison? WTF? If the judge wanted to make an example of her why not give her a driving ban? Compare and contrast.. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/13/child-star-of-the-omen-sentenced-on-friday-13th-for-road-rage-attack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:58:06 PM UTC, Nick wrote:
On 01/02/2017 21:40, Simon Mason wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...road-rage.html OK, she's a mouthy bitch, but prison? WTF? Because she was under a suspended sentence at the time of the offence and that is how suspended sentences work. If the judge wanted to make an example of her why not give her a driving ban? I agree, an indefinite driving ban until a court rules she is mentally fit to drive which she clearly isn't at the moment. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On 01/02/2017 23:19, wrote:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:58:06 PM UTC, Nick wrote: On 01/02/2017 21:40, Simon Mason wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...road-rage.html OK, she's a mouthy bitch, but prison? WTF? Because she was under a suspended sentence at the time of the offence and that is how suspended sentences work. The suspended sentence was for theft. The ABH etc was probably related to trying to escape, otherwise I suspect she would already be in jail. If the judge wanted to make an example of her why not give her a driving ban? I agree, an indefinite driving ban until a court rules she is mentally fit to drive which she clearly isn't at the moment. This crime was all about her driving. A ban is sensible, cheap for us, not so damaging for her kid and a good lesson for her. Jail should only be used in extreme cases. This was a type of behaviour that happens very often. Within the last three months I have had one driver threatening and swearing at me for signalling left when they wanted to undertake and another beep me for riding in the middle of the road. We can't send them all to jail but we could give out a lot of bans. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On 02/02/2017 13:44, Nick wrote:
On 01/02/2017 23:19, wrote: On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:58:06 PM UTC, Nick wrote: On 01/02/2017 21:40, Simon Mason wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...road-rage.html OK, she's a mouthy bitch, but prison? WTF? Because she was under a suspended sentence at the time of the offence and that is how suspended sentences work. The suspended sentence was for theft. The ABH etc was probably related to trying to escape, otherwise I suspect she would already be in jail. If the judge wanted to make an example of her why not give her a driving ban? I agree, an indefinite driving ban until a court rules she is mentally fit to drive which she clearly isn't at the moment. This crime was all about her driving. A ban is sensible, cheap for us, not so damaging for her kid and a good lesson for her. Jail should only be used in extreme cases. This was a type of behaviour that happens very often. Within the last three months I have had one driver threatening and swearing at me for signalling left when they wanted to undertake and another beep me for riding in the middle of the road. We can't send them all to jail but we could give out a lot of bans. When will cyclists be banned from the roads? Even when they kill, they do not get a ban. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On 02/02/2017 13:44, Nick wrote:
On 01/02/2017 23:19, wrote: On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:58:06 PM UTC, Nick wrote: On 01/02/2017 21:40, Simon Mason wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...road-rage.html OK, she's a mouthy bitch, but prison? WTF? Because she was under a suspended sentence at the time of the offence and that is how suspended sentences work. The suspended sentence was for theft. The ABH etc was probably related to trying to escape, otherwise I suspect she would already be in jail. If the judge wanted to make an example of her why not give her a driving ban? I agree, an indefinite driving ban until a court rules she is mentally fit to drive which she clearly isn't at the moment. This crime was all about her driving. A ban is sensible, cheap for us, not so damaging for her kid and a good lesson for her. Jail should only be used in extreme cases. This was a type of behaviour that happens very often. Within the last three months I have had one driver threatening and swearing at me for signalling left when they wanted to undertake and another beep me for riding in the middle of the road. We can't send them all to jail but we could give out a lot of bans. She was convicted of driving without reasonable consideration for other road users. That is endorsable, but rarely results in a disqualification because it isn't seen as necessarily causing danger (that would be DD or DWDCAA). But there was also "using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour". I am not aware that this second offence is punishable by a driving ban. But it sounds robust enough to at least trigger her suspended sentence. But... QUOTE: A court heard she formed a weapon with her fingers and cocked it at Mr Vine´s head as he pulled alongside her at a set of traffic lights, which he interpreted as a 'serious threat'. ENDQUOTE That is pathetic. Vine is either a total drama queen or has an unhealthy belief in the existence and power of magic. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:44:25 +0000
Nick wrote: A ban is sensible, cheap for us, not so damaging for her kid and a good lesson for her. Jail should only be used in extreme cases. Like someone who threatens serious assault while driving an illegal vehicle, perhaps? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On 02/02/2017 14:20, JNugent wrote:
On 02/02/2017 13:44, Nick wrote: On 01/02/2017 23:19, wrote: On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:58:06 PM UTC, Nick wrote: On 01/02/2017 21:40, Simon Mason wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...road-rage.html OK, she's a mouthy bitch, but prison? WTF? Because she was under a suspended sentence at the time of the offence and that is how suspended sentences work. The suspended sentence was for theft. The ABH etc was probably related to trying to escape, otherwise I suspect she would already be in jail. If the judge wanted to make an example of her why not give her a driving ban? I agree, an indefinite driving ban until a court rules she is mentally fit to drive which she clearly isn't at the moment. This crime was all about her driving. A ban is sensible, cheap for us, not so damaging for her kid and a good lesson for her. Jail should only be used in extreme cases. This was a type of behaviour that happens very often. Within the last three months I have had one driver threatening and swearing at me for signalling left when they wanted to undertake and another beep me for riding in the middle of the road. We can't send them all to jail but we could give out a lot of bans. She was convicted of driving without reasonable consideration for other road users. That is endorsable, but rarely results in a disqualification because it isn't seen as necessarily causing danger (that would be DD or DWDCAA). But there was also "using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour". I am not aware that this second offence is punishable by a driving ban. But it sounds robust enough to at least trigger her suspended sentence. But... QUOTE: A court heard she formed a weapon with her fingers and cocked it at Mr Vine´s head as he pulled alongside her at a set of traffic lights, which he interpreted as a 'serious threat'. ENDQUOTE That is pathetic. Vine is either a total drama queen or has an unhealthy belief in the existence and power of magic. It was the voodoo doll with the pins that really frightened him. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
GUILTY AS CHARGED
On 02/02/2017 15:02, Rob Morley wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:44:25 +0000 Nick wrote: A ban is sensible, cheap for us, not so damaging for her kid and a good lesson for her. Jail should only be used in extreme cases. Like someone who threatens serious assault while driving an illegal vehicle, perhaps? If JV had ridden away rather than obstruct her and want to get into an argument, then nothing would have happened. He is just lucky that his actions did not lead to serious or fatal injury. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Di Luca Guilty As Charged - EPO | Tom Kunich | Racing | 6 | December 18th 09 11:03 PM |
lauren fickett 925-933-6979 is guilty of tax fraud, attempted carjacking, kidnapping, murder and is guilty of assault and battery 903Dartmouth Way Concord, CA 5884 w tucson estates pkwy tucson, az 520-883-7486 | [email protected] | Unicycling | 1 | October 5th 08 01:09 PM |
Guilty Until Proven Guilty | Burt | Racing | 3 | June 23rd 07 07:00 PM |
Millar Line Stage 7: Guilty Guilty Guilty! | Ryan Cousineau | Racing | 0 | July 9th 06 12:45 AM |
driver charged (at last...) | wafflycat | UK | 17 | April 21st 06 05:01 PM |