A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » Australia
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

safety in numbers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 8th 09, 09:34 PM posted to aus.bicycle
Zebee Johnstone
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,960
Default safety in numbers


http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/06/08...-more-numbers/

Yet more proof that the best way to make cycling safer is more
cyclists.

There are going to be some compounding factors as nothing in traffic
changes in isolation, but still looks like a good set of numbers.

Zebee

=========
On heels of some recent findings in NYC that the cycle
fatality rate has declined, I came across this report from CTC with a
few other interesting stats:

1. London has seen a 91% increase in cycling since 2000 and a 33% fall
in cycle casualties since 1994-98. This means that cycling in the city
is 2.9 times safer than it was previously.

2. The Netherlands has witnessed a 45% increase in cycling from
1980-2005 and a 58% decrease in cyclist fatalities.

3. Copenhagen, 1995-2006: 44% increase in cycling, 60% decrease in
KSIs, with cycle to work modal share rising from 31% to 36%.5.
========
Ads
  #2  
Old June 25th 09, 05:32 AM posted to aus.bicycle
John Dwyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default safety in numbers


"Zebee Johnstone" wrote in message
...

http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/06/08...-more-numbers/

Yet more proof that the best way to make cycling safer is more
cyclists.

There are going to be some compounding factors as nothing in traffic
changes in isolation, but still looks like a good set of numbers.

Zebee

=========
On heels of some recent findings in NYC that the cycle
fatality rate has declined, I came across this report from CTC with a
few other interesting stats:

1. London has seen a 91% increase in cycling since 2000 and a 33% fall
in cycle casualties since 1994-98. This means that cycling in the city
is 2.9 times safer than it was previously.

2. The Netherlands has witnessed a 45% increase in cycling from
1980-2005 and a 58% decrease in cyclist fatalities.

3. Copenhagen, 1995-2006: 44% increase in cycling, 60% decrease in
KSIs, with cycle to work modal share rising from 31% to 36%.5.
========


One might speculate that with more cyclists on the road, motorists finally
realise the cycling is legitimate road use and they must be more aware of
other road users. There is no comment in the article on the link that the
police and the courts are dealing enforcing roads being there for all users.
Other speculations are possible.

John Dwyer.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safety in numbers? Clive George UK 13 March 31st 09 10:05 PM
Some data on Safety In Numbers. spindrift UK 22 November 10th 08 03:48 PM
Safety in Numbers Roos Eisma UK 249 September 17th 08 09:20 AM
Safety in Numbers. Simon Mason UK 11 April 23rd 05 09:34 PM
bicycling - safety in numbers Paul R Social Issues 7 April 20th 05 03:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.