|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the
inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
... This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Psychos call it filtering! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful"
wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Yes: "The driver was in the cycle box so we couldn't get in front" therefore the cyclists came up the inside. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
"Mrcheerful" wrote
This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Brilliant. Paint an ASL in the road but leave a lamp post in the killing zone. I agree, don't overtake the first vehicle in a queue (ASL or not, left or right) unless you can be sure it is going to stay there for some time. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. Then we see the source of the real stupidity. Interesting how many reports of left turn victims seem to be about women. If there is a pattern, what are men doing differently? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:34:08 +0100, "Mrcheerful"
wrote: Bertie Wooster wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Yes: "The driver was in the cycle box so we couldn't get in front" therefore the cyclists came up the inside. That suggests nothing of the sort. It suggests this: The cyclists were in the cycle box when the truck pulled alongside by going into the cycle box. The cyclists could not get ahead of the truck because that would mean going leaving the cycle box. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:34:08 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Bertie Wooster wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Yes: "The driver was in the cycle box so we couldn't get in front" therefore the cyclists came up the inside. That suggests nothing of the sort. It suggests this: The cyclists were in the cycle box when the truck pulled alongside by going into the cycle box. The cyclists could not get ahead of the truck because that would mean going leaving the cycle box. only in the mind of a psycholist. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels The boy-friend: "I do not blame the driver but there are many kinds of people on the road and everything needs to be made stupid-proof so even a kid can understand how to use it." That's not a very nice thing for him to say about his girl-friend - speaking ill of the dead. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:13:02 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Even more relevant : can you quote the bit where the driver was found guilty of an offence. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
never undertake
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:13:13 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:34:08 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Bertie Wooster wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful" wrote: This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can be. http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck? Yes: "The driver was in the cycle box so we couldn't get in front" therefore the cyclists came up the inside. That suggests nothing of the sort. It suggests this: The cyclists were in the cycle box when the truck pulled alongside by going into the cycle box. The cyclists could not get ahead of the truck because that would mean going leaving the cycle box. Oh dear : "If Miss Fernandez was five metres ahead in the cycling box Mr Grant would have seen her." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pass a door's width away and do not undertake | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 71 | May 16th 13 04:48 PM |