|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx
-- Bod --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On 14/12/2015 11:35, Bod wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx That's a lie. It is not what the article says at all. The article's writer claims that up to 30% of drivers in *some* areas may be without insurance when they drive. That's not good, of course. But it's a lot less startling than 30% of the whole nation's drivers being uninsured. The article even provides a handy list of postcode areas where this "up to 30%" may apply. Reading between the lines, those areas may suffer from other social malaise(s) as well. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/09/12/article-2036332-0DD6378600000578-61_233x593.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
4.3% of drivers-Britain are uninsured
On 14/12/2015 17:34, JNugent wrote:
On 14/12/2015 11:35, Bod wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx That's a lie. It is not what the article says at all. The article's writer claims that up to 30% of drivers in *some* areas may be without insurance when they drive. That's not good, of course. But it's a lot less startling than 30% of the whole nation's drivers being uninsured. The article even provides a handy list of postcode areas where this "up to 30%" may apply. Reading between the lines, those areas may suffer from other social malaise(s) as well. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/09/12/article-2036332-0DD6378600000578-61_233x593.jpg This is the problem with half witted cyclists. They read something online which they don't question because they aren't bright enough. Crispin is of course a prime example of this stupidity. The real figure is 4.3% and this figure is going down; "Phil Gormley of the Association of Chief Police Officers added that there are 500,000 fewer uninsured vehicles on the roads today compared with five years ago." -- Dave Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
4.3% of drivers-Britain are uninsured
On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 7:46:42 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:
This is the problem with half witted cyclists. They read something online which they don't question because they aren't bright enough. Crispin is of course a prime example of this stupidity. Says the Plankwit, who when told that Government figure suggest that there are between 780,000 and 920,000 casualties on the road each year, divided the miles of road in the UK by the higher estimate to quote the figure of a casualty every 3.92 miles (the actual figure is over 15 times higher). He then spent weeks confusing years with days, believing that he should be seeing 3.92 casualties* lying on the roadside for every mile he drives. *Not true. He still confuses the word "crash" with "casualty", and thinks that he should be seeing 3.92 crashes for every mile he drives. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-// in some parts of //Britain areuninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:35:04 +0000
Bod wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx "Incredibly, research by the MIB found that one in ten 18 to 34-year-old drivers is unaware that car insurance is a legal requirement." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-// in some parts of //Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On 14/12/2015 23:43, Rob Morley wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:35:04 +0000 Bod wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx "Incredibly, research by the MIB found that one in ten 18 to 34-year-old drivers is unaware that car insurance is a legal requirement." Or that's what they say when questioned..... -- Dave Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On 15/12/2015 01:30, Phil W Lee wrote:
Bod considered Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:35:04 +0000 the perfect time to write: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx That's probably greater than the percentage of uninsured cyclists, and it isn't even compulsory for them. It's a patent lie. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On 15/12/2015 01:39, JNugent wrote:
On 15/12/2015 01:30, Phil W Lee wrote: Bod considered Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:35:04 +0000 the perfect time to write: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx That's probably greater than the percentage of uninsured cyclists, and it isn't even compulsory for them. It's a patent lie. Ok, then supply proof to the contrary. -- Bod --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On 15/12/2015 05:30, Bod wrote:
On 15/12/2015 01:39, JNugent wrote: On 15/12/2015 01:30, Phil W Lee wrote: Bod considered Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:35:04 +0000 the perfect time to write: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx That's probably greater than the percentage of uninsured cyclists, and it isn't even compulsory for them. It's a patent lie. Ok, then supply proof to the contrary. Were you the OP? The article describes "up to"[*] 30% *in some areas*. And then goes on to list some of the worst residential areas in the UK's conurbations. [* "up to" being one of the advertising world's worst and most meaningless weasel phrases] The OP claimed "30% of drivers - Britain" without reservation or limitation. And that is such a pathetic lie that it's not necessary to explain further. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
30% of drivers-Britain are uninsured-adding-£30 to your premium
On 15/12/2015 10:16, JNugent wrote:
On 15/12/2015 05:30, Bod wrote: On 15/12/2015 01:39, JNugent wrote: On 15/12/2015 01:30, Phil W Lee wrote: Bod considered Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:35:04 +0000 the perfect time to write: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3uIHugtWx That's probably greater than the percentage of uninsured cyclists, and it isn't even compulsory for them. It's a patent lie. Ok, then supply proof to the contrary. Were you the OP? The article describes "up to"[*] 30% *in some areas*. And then goes on to list some of the worst residential areas in the UK's conurbations. [* "up to" being one of the advertising world's worst and most meaningless weasel phrases] The OP claimed "30% of drivers - Britain" without reservation or limitation. And that is such a pathetic lie that it's not necessary to explain further. A family of three could have one of them uninsured and that would be over 30 percent. Without any useful figures, like out of one hundred thousand or something it is pretty pointless speculating even for a small town. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More than 600 drivers imprisoned for killing someone while drivingallowed back on Britain's roads | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 12 | January 27th 12 09:33 AM |
1.4 million uninsured drivers. | Doug[_13_] | UK | 30 | September 15th 11 10:41 AM |
Uninsured motorists. | Doug[_3_] | UK | 126 | September 27th 09 07:44 PM |
OT - Fining the uninsured.... | Michael Baldwin | Techniques | 18 | July 4th 09 04:02 PM |
Total number of cyclists in the UK is fewer than the number of uninsured drivers. | spindrift | UK | 94 | October 23rd 06 12:55 AM |