|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Edward Dolan wrote:
I have often wondered if the conventional bicycle saddle used extensively over many years does not cause bladder and prostate problems. There is no chance whatever that a recumbent seat would cause these problems, but I not so sure about saddles. Testicular cancer is another possible casualty of bike saddles. And possibly hydroceles too. All that pressure in the groin area caused by sitting on a conventional bike saddle cannot be good for the human anatomy. Conventional saddles support the sit bones, not the groin. Or at least /should/ support the sit bones and not the groin. If the saddle is the right shape for the rider (and that may be a big "if") then there should be no pressure on anything that will cause any more problem than sitting on the ground. This is not to say it will necessarily be /comfortable/ over a long time, but there should be no particular reason for bladder, testicular or prostate problems. But there's no guarantee that a Brand X saddle will be the right shape for a particular rider and the wrong one could well cause all sorts of problems, starting with considerable discomfort and escalating from there. Maybe some who claims to be an expert in medical physics could enlighten us. Maybe they could, maybe they couldn't. Though I've never claimed to be an expert in the field I do know what medical physics /is/, so I know there's no particular link between anatomical problems caused by saddles and medical physics, so whether some or other expert in the field would know about saddles you'd have to take on a case by case basis. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
(WivFam) wrote in message ...
Hi im currently designing a recumbent bike for a university project. The bike is for a parent and child to use on the school run. Does anyone have any suggestions for safe and practical seating positions for both the adult and child. The adult will be the sole operater. Also, what are the main benifits of a recumbant bike compared to an upright? i know the eye line would be considerably lower on a recumbent. how does this affect your vunerability on the road? Again from Hase: http://www.hase-bikes.com/ens/trets/index.php I think this would be more stable than the one wheel trailer bikes. It could be hooked behind _anything_ and locked up at the school. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hase P.S. , note the photo combining the Pino Peter mentioned, and the Trets:
http://www.hase-bikes.com/ens/trets/index.php?bild=B2 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Clinch" wrote
Conventional saddles support the sit bones, not the groin. Or at least /should/ support the sit bones and not the groin. If the saddle is the right shape for the rider (and that may be a big "if") then there should be no pressure on anything that will cause any more problem than sitting on the ground. [...] There are some studies that suggest bike seat/saddle design/usage/fit may play a role in certain medical problems. http://www.emedicine.com/sports/topic12.htm http://www.bycycleinc.com/pages/article_MTJ.html (see references) And there's an industry built around "special" seats to address the 'problems'. http://www.spongywonder.com/ %^) Marketing copy on one special bike seat at LBS read something like "Our design reduces penile numbness...". Made me wonder what is the desired/acceptable level of that condition... %^P Maybe some who claims to be an expert in medical physics could enlighten us. Maybe they could, maybe they couldn't. Though I've never claimed to be an expert in the field I do know what medical physics /is/ [...] The chances of the lately perennial persona and self- imagined master baiter of ARBR ever knowing what it is, or even knowing what IT is are small, but seemingly significantly larger than the possibility he will contribute meaningful and/or insightful content or make a logical, cogent argument about anything. There's a Monty Python sketch in here, somewhere, perhaps several. The argument, dead parrot, Piranha brothers, black knight,... Take your pick. Jon Meinecke |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: I have often wondered if the conventional bicycle saddle used extensively over many years does not cause bladder and prostate problems. There is no chance whatever that a recumbent seat would cause these problems, but I not so sure about saddles. Testicular cancer is another possible casualty of bike saddles. And possibly hydroceles too. All that pressure in the groin area caused by sitting on a conventional bike saddle cannot be good for the human anatomy. Conventional saddles support the sit bones, not the groin. Or at least /should/ support the sit bones and not the groin. If the saddle is the right shape for the rider (and that may be a big "if") then there should be no pressure on anything that will cause any more problem than sitting on the ground. This is not to say it will necessarily be /comfortable/ over a long time, but there should be no particular reason for bladder, testicular or prostate problems. But there's no guarantee that a Brand X saddle will be the right shape for a particular rider and the wrong one could well cause all sorts of problems, starting with considerable discomfort and escalating from there. Maybe someone who claims to be an expert in medical physics could enlighten us. Maybe they could, maybe they couldn't. Though I've never claimed to be an expert in the field I do know what medical physics /is/, so I know there's no particular link between anatomical problems caused by saddles and medical physics, so whether some or other expert in the field would know about saddles you'd have to take on a case by case basis. Still, an awful lot of cyclists seem to have problems with organs and tissues located in the groin area, including Lance Armstrong who developed testicular cancer which almost killed him. Your bit about the sit bones is right on, but the fact is that most of us are not on our sit bones to the exclusion of not being on anything else. Very many cyclists complain of penile numbness, so that right there tells you they are doing something wrong. Do you think kids know about that sit bone business? We can't be sure that there is no connection between bike saddles and medical problems in the groin area, despite what this particular expert in medical physics has to say about it. -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Jon Meinecke" wrote in message news:1098365700.KbG/nubnDa8LqatGdHhGNw@teranews... "Peter Clinch" wrote Conventional saddles support the sit bones, not the groin. Or at least /should/ support the sit bones and not the groin. If the saddle is the right shape for the rider (and that may be a big "if") then there should be no pressure on anything that will cause any more problem than sitting on the ground. [...] There are some studies that suggest bike seat/saddle design/usage/fit may play a role in certain medical problems. http://www.emedicine.com/sports/topic12.htm http://www.bycycleinc.com/pages/article_MTJ.html (see references) And there's an industry built around "special" seats to address the 'problems'. http://www.spongywonder.com/ %^) Marketing copy on one special bike seat at LBS read something like "Our design reduces penile numbness...". Made me wonder what is the desired/acceptable level of that condition... %^P Maybe some who claims to be an expert in medical physics could enlighten us. Maybe they could, maybe they couldn't. Though I've never claimed to be an expert in the field I do know what medical physics /is/ [...] The chances of the lately perennial persona and self- imagined master baiter of ARBR ever knowing what it is, or even knowing what IT is are small, but seemingly significantly larger than the possibility he will contribute meaningful and/or insightful content or make a logical, cogent argument about anything. I am determined never to look up what medical physics is about. Instead, it is my aim to goad this donkey from Scotland to tell us what medical physics is. Either that or I will continue to poke fun at him and his occupation until hell freezes over. He has made his occupation an issue by telling us what it is that he does with his every signature. Like Kerry, he never knows when to shut up about himself. Meinecke is mostly just jealous of me. I don't blame him though as there is a lot here to be jealous of. He would like to be able to engender posts like I do, but it is beyond him. You have to have a broad education to do what I do. Narrow minded skunks like him can only do one thing and that is to stay on topic, even if the topic is boring enough to drive a numskull out of his skull. But it takes a special skill too to be that kind of boring. But a dullard like him I never was. There's a Monty Python sketch in here, somewhere, perhaps several. The argument, dead parrot, Piranha brothers, black knight,... Take your pick. Only a screw ball like Meinecke would watch something so stupid as Monty Python. That is for the English, who as all the world knows have a very weird sense of humor. Hey, you English ... move over - here is another American nut case for you! But his name looks German, so he may not really fit in all that well. -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Edward Dolan wrote:
Still, an awful lot of cyclists seem to have problems with organs and tissues located in the groin area, including Lance Armstrong who developed testicular cancer which almost killed him. Your bit about the sit bones is right on, but the fact is that most of us are not on our sit bones to the exclusion of not being on anything else. Very many cyclists complain of penile numbness, so that right there tells you they are doing something wrong. Do you think kids know about that sit bone business? I doubt it in a large number of cases, and I also think that the fact that a lot of people are labouring under the misapprehension that a $70 bike from Walmart will somehow represent the acme of comfort and technical sophistication won't help either, as said items will probably have appalling saddles, albeit with "Gel Comfort" written on them to show how good they must be. If it's an intrinsic problem we would find a hugely greater percentage of these problems in nations with a cycling culture such as NL and Denmark. I'm not aware of any such disproportionate incidence rate and in the absence of any such obvious trends it looks like an awareness problem that's best treated by education to remove ignorance. We can't be sure that there is no connection between bike saddles and medical problems in the groin area, despite what this particular expert in medical physics has to say about it. What expert in medical physics? I've never claimed to be any such thing, but as I've already pointed out medical physics is not especially concerned with anatomy. This seems to be an awareness problem for you, that would be best treated by education to remove ignorance. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Jon Meinecke" wrote in message news:1098365700.KbG/nubnDa8LqatGdHhGNw@teranews... "Peter Clinch" wrote Conventional saddles support the sit bones, not the groin. Or at least /should/ support the sit bones and not the groin. If the saddle is the right shape for the rider (and that may be a big "if") then there should be no pressure on anything that will cause any more problem than sitting on the ground. [...] There are some studies that suggest bike seat/saddle design/usage/fit may play a role in certain medical problems. http://www.emedicine.com/sports/topic12.htm http://www.bycycleinc.com/pages/article_MTJ.html (see references) And there's an industry built around "special" seats to address the 'problems'. http://www.spongywonder.com/ %^) Marketing copy on one special bike seat at LBS read something like "Our design reduces penile numbness...". Made me wonder what is the desired/acceptable level of that condition... %^P Everyone on the group who thinks bike saddles have nothing to do with medical problems in the groin area should carefully read the above articles. I found this to be particularly interesting: "Bicycle seat design (eg, shape) may be the major extrinsic factor for the development of bicycle seat neuropathy. Results of computer modelling reported by Spears et al in 2003 have shown that wider bicycle seats that support the ischial tuberosities decrease pressure on the perineal area." [see first link above for attribution] Hells Bells! I have been saying that from day one, over 25 years ago. Those narrow racing saddles are murder. I knew from the beginning that you had to have a wider platform in the rear of the saddle for those sit bones to rest on. Damn racers are all crazy anyway! Screw them! -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: Still, an awful lot of cyclists seem to have problems with organs and tissues located in the groin area, including Lance Armstrong who developed testicular cancer which almost killed him. Your bit about the sit bones is right on, but the fact is that most of us are not on our sit bones to the exclusion of not being on anything else. Very many cyclists complain of penile numbness, so that right there tells you they are doing something wrong. Do you think kids know about that sit bone business? I doubt it in a large number of cases, and I also think that the fact that a lot of people are labouring under the misapprehension that a $70 bike from Walmart will somehow represent the acme of comfort and technical sophistication won't help either, as said items will probably have appalling saddles, albeit with "Gel Comfort" written on them to show how good they must be. Open any bike catalog and you will see literally several pages devoted to bike saddles. Those Wal-Mart bikes with their comfort saddles on them are an honest attempt to address a problem that you claim hardly exists. The only numskulls in this scenario are the racers with their narrow racing style saddles on their $2000. bikes. If it's an intrinsic problem we would find a hugely greater percentage of these problems in nations with a cycling culture such as NL and Denmark. I'm not aware of any such disproportionate incidence rate and in the absence of any such obvious trends it looks like an awareness problem that's best treated by education to remove ignorance. Those Europeans who cycle a lot are most likely just commuting short distances and not putting on many miles at all. A lot of this stuff only kicks in on all day week long types of rides. The way to solve a problem is by designing out what is causing the problem in the first place, not by so-called education. I blame the designers of bike saddles for the discomfort and medical problems they cause, not the end user. We can't be sure that there is no connection between bike saddles and medical problems in the groin area, despite what this particular expert in medical physics has to say about it. What expert in medical physics? I've never claimed to be any such thing, but as I've already pointed out medical physics is not especially concerned with anatomy. This seems to be an awareness problem for you, that would be best treated by education to remove ignorance. I am waiting for you to explain your mysterious occupation. Is it even a profession or is it like calling a janitor a sanitation engineer? Perhaps you sweep the corridors in the hospital and empty the trash containers? While education is important, it is not the answer to most of the problems that plague human kind. The eternal question is how to make people better, not how to make them smarter. I am sure you do not have a clue. -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
It appears there are many different attitudes to the problems
encountered by recumbent cycle users. Clearly, therefore, design is still to be done. To iron out these problems with safety and powering etc. Perhaps, like Dyson himself concluded, there is a much more efficient way of doing a job machines have been doing for years. Vacuum cleaners used bags, this was the norm, and was never questioned. Look how wrong we were! My point being, have we taken the recubent vehicle as far as we ever can?! Or are we just at a happy medium, like we were with our vacuum cleaners! I therefore think it is a good idea to look at the possibilities of improving safety, powering, weather protection and any other problems your research uncovers! (Maybe it will replace the car! Perhaps you won't, but who are we to judge!) So, lets all try and help out, and give andy our own experiences of using these vehicles. As who better to ask about making improvements than the people who use the vehicles! Good Luck with your research and design. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Recumbent history on CD from Dick Ryan | Martin Krieg | Recumbent Biking | 0 | September 30th 04 09:14 PM |
Michigan Recumbent Rally West This Saturday | Wolverbob | Recumbent Biking | 1 | September 10th 04 03:21 AM |
Correct Seating Position | Adrian | Australia | 5 | January 2nd 04 12:25 AM |
Unfaired Recumbent vs. Upright Speed Comparisons | B. Sanders | Recumbent Biking | 57 | November 8th 03 03:43 PM |