Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to a
car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless you
live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air while
you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you, with
different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

--
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history--with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to
a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to
carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective
facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster".
I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your
opinions.

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to
a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to
carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective
facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster".
I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your
opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for anyone.

--
Two crows together is an attempted murder.

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015
19:55:14 +0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to a
car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless you
live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air while
you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you, with
different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles
under consideration.

Between cars it's a matter of opinion, but not between a car and a bike. You might aswell compare garden furniture and a sofa.

Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top Gear were forced to acknowledge.

Why the **** would you live in a ******** like that?

--
We've had a hot, dry summer this year. It was so hot that one of my neighbors said his wife even thawed out.

On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access
to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective
facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster".
I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your
opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for
anyone.

That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances.
How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it?

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14
+0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to
a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to
carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under
consideration. Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top
Gear were forced to acknowledge.

He is so arrogant as to think that his opinions must be establiched facts.

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:46:31 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee
wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14
+0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access
to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under
consideration.

Between cars it's a matter of opinion, but not between a car and a bike.
Also between a car and a bike
You might aswell compare garden furniture and a sofa.
What does that have to do with the price of hagfish?

Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top Gear were forced
to acknowledge.

Why the **** would you live in a ******** like that?
Some people have to. Something to do with jobs, money, etc.
"********" is only your opinion, also.

On 13/05/2015 22:38, Phil W Lee wrote:


I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles
under consideration.


Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable
than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You
probably qualify on both grounds.


Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as
even Top Gear were forced to acknowledge.


Top Gear weren't forced to acknowledge anything of the sort, idiot. The
challenge was clearly staged for TV entertainment only.

It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a
bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 14/05/2015 18:44, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 13/05/2015 22:38, Phil W Lee wrote:


I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles
under consideration.


Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable
than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You
probably qualify on both grounds.


Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as
even Top Gear were forced to acknowledge.


Top Gear weren't forced to acknowledge anything of the sort, idiot. The
challenge was clearly staged for TV entertainment only.

It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a
bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice.


I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNyadU6NPEU

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:28:00 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:46:31 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee
wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14
+0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access
to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under
consideration.

Between cars it's a matter of opinion, but not between a car and a bike.
Also between a car and a bike
You might aswell compare garden furniture and a sofa.
What does that have to do with the price of hagfish?

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses.

Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top Gear were forced
to acknowledge.

Why the **** would you live in a ******** like that?
Some people have to. Something to do with jobs, money, etc.
"********" is only your opinion, also.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this.

--
Peter is listening to The Who - Behind Blue Eyes