|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
The Gerry Attrick bike: Mixte or Bent?
On Feb 4, 8:21*am, Peter Clinch wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: My interest isn't in high performance bikes even now that I'm whole and and hale and hearty. One suspects that with advancing years one's interest will focus even more closely on comfort and utility. Bad wording on my part, but I regard "comfort and utility" to be performance aspects as well. *Moultons are comfortable thanks to the low stepover and good road-going suspension, and utilitarian because of the convenience and tight steering of the small wheels. But most of his bikes I wouldn't spend my own money on; I have too much spaceframe experience to like bunches of little tubes -- call it a personal prejudice, if you like. I'm a big beam man. The Bridgestone Moulton doesn't have a spaceframe Furthermore, I live in a country where the roads are (were until recently, actually) so bad that a bicyclist on the way home from the pub falling into a pothole and drowning was a matter of national political outrage rather than a cruel joke. Small wheels just won't do. As someone who lives on an untracked lane and has a Brompton with even smaller wheels, I suspect that's more about prejudice than experience. Furthermore the case that if the roads are poor then a good road-going suspension will make a very useful difference to ride comfort. I could be tempted by a Moulton design because it is without a doubt a significant bike. Both the TSR and he Bridgestone seem to me pretty reasonably priced. But I've already decided my next bike must use my Cyber Nexus groupset, and I've also fallen in love with the 622 Bontrager wheels the hubs are built into... Besides, I'm thirty years past buying something just because it is the most significant product of its kind. In the end, to me the Moultons are not different enough, merely a different, if significant, execution of an upright bike. Recumbents have other serious problems. I was never a bike racer, so I never learned to pull on the upstroke and I'm not planning on learning now. Cleats and shoecages and straps are a nuisance I don't need. A compact like the HPVelotechnik Spirit is quite typically used with normal platform pedals, there not being the sort of advantage of clipless associated with more laid back examples. *Also the case that something like the Spirit has a fairly high and relatively upright seating posotion so you won't be staring out wheel nuts: in fact you'd have an eye-view slightly higher than a typical driver. By golly, now that's a proper, German, thoroughly thought-through recumbent bike, right down to keeping the chain grease off proper trousers. Thanks for showing me that one, Pete; I've saved the Kinesis review link on it. The thing I learned about recumbents in those half-dozen rides is encapsulated in something truly shiver- making that Tom Sherman said when he mentioned riders "trained" for riding recumbents. I don't fancy retraining for cycling, an activity I consider should be fun rather than a socially acceptable form of sado- masochism. Again, there's recumbents and there's other recumbents. *The Spirit is very much a climb aboard and pedal off design that shouldn't need any re-training, just a short period (and by short I mean somewhere between seconds and hours, not days, weeks or months) of familiarisation. *It's also the most immediately comfortable bike I've ever sat on in my life, bar none. *Not so good for a long tour as a more laid-back example with the weight more in the middle, but that's only an issue if you're touring. *Sounds to me like you're just getting about, and if that's so No even that. My physician is next door, the shops and library less than five minutes from my front door. I use the bike for daily exercise, and if the day is fine ride further, but my maximum round trip is only 22km. then a Spirit or a Bridgestone only really raise problems in the cost, being that much more than a good roadster. No more expensive than a custom bike. But the Spirit is not anybody's geriatric bike. A proper gerrybike will have zero maintenance or as close as makes no difference. That means a fully enclosed chain. Older people may be unable to bend to provide regular service to open gears and chain, and may find the bike too heavy to lift up on stand. Pete. -- Peter Clinch * * * * * * * * * *Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 * Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 * * * * * * *Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net * *http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ Excellent going, Pete. If for some reason I give up on the big wheels and the chaincase, I'll take another look at the Spirit, which is clearly a more user-friendly recumbent. Andre Jute Logical progress |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
OT: Mr. Ed's quoting hierarchy
"still just me" wrote in message ... [...] Congratulations. You actually managed to properly quote the previous post. I knew you could do it if you put your mind to it. You need to worry less about quotation marks and more about saying something that others would find interesting to read. The only posts that I get on my newsreader that are messed up are from Google Groups and that is because those who post from that website do not know what the hell they are doing. Even so, it is very easy to mess up when using Google Groups and I would never use it myself. There is no substitute for a proper newsreader. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
OT: Mr. Ed's quoting hierarchy
I knew you could do it if you put your mind to it.
=x= But that would require some sort of mind. _Jym_ |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
OT: Mr. Ed's quoting hierarchy
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message ... I knew you could do it if you put your mind to it. =x= But that would require some sort of mind. _Jym_ There is not one person in a thousand on Usenet who has any wit. I myself do not have it, so I never attempt it. I just plug along in my accustomed manner and occasionally I become humorous in spite of myself. I suggest that Jym Dyer follow my example and forego all attempts at wit. Why fall flat when you don't have to! "Skip" was the only poster to ARBR who ever evinced any wit. I think you have to come at the world sideways in order for wit to kick in. Those who come at the world head on like I do are incapable of it, as is Jym Dyer of course. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
The Gerry Attrick bike: Mixte or Bent?
Andre Jute wrote:
No more expensive than a custom bike. But the Spirit is not anybody's geriatric bike. A proper gerrybike will have zero maintenance or as close as makes no difference. That means a fully enclosed chain. The chains are in tubes but the crank isn't enclosed... /but/ (and IME of 'bents it's a big "but") without the crank placed low and behind the front wheel the amount of crud it catches is minimal, far, far less than is the case on a "normal" bike, so there's not much chain cleaning needed. The Spirit can also be specified with a SRAM 8 speed hub gear (in fact that's the default option), so you don't need to worry much about cleaning the gears. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Gerry Attrick bike: Mixte or Bent? | Andre Jute | Techniques | 50 | February 5th 08 08:20 AM |
Bent hanger -- Bent frame? ... shifting problems | DaveH[_2_] | Techniques | 16 | October 8th 07 02:14 AM |
No one snickered at my old mixte | Leonardo | Techniques | 9 | July 16th 07 11:43 PM |
Mixte frames, Manufacturer & on display, S & W Sydney. | Terry Collins | Australia | 13 | May 9th 06 06:53 AM |
Black Bent Down: Worst Experience on a Bent This Year | jim h | Recumbent Biking | 14 | November 30th 03 10:58 PM |