A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Kerry: Road Bush: Mountain



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old November 6th 04, 02:20 PM
Mark Cook
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
...
Mark Cook wrote:
Having read the report, I knew that your "new voter" comments were
completely wrong.


Oh?

The massive Kerry supporting "MTV" crowd failed to show
up.


You just made my case.


Really? You said NEW VOTERS. I point out that they did not show, and that
makes your case???

ROFLMOA!!!!

--Blair
"Thank you."


Do you have ANY concept of reality???


Ads
  #152  
Old November 7th 04, 12:08 AM
Blair P. Houghton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Cook wrote:
"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
.. .
Mark Cook wrote:
Having read the report, I knew that your "new voter" comments were
completely wrong.


Oh?

The massive Kerry supporting "MTV" crowd failed to show
up.


You just made my case.


Really? You said NEW VOTERS. I point out that they did not show, and that
makes your case???


Right. My case was that Kerry was less adept at getting
new voters to show than Bush was. You proved my point.

ROFLMOA!!!!


You're laughing at your own inability to follow the conversation.

--Blair
"Thank you."


Do you have ANY concept of reality???


Some define intelligence as the ability to carry on a conversation.

I think you can do the math from there.

BTW, Karl Rove agrees with me. For the first time in
history, more Republicans than Democrats voted. In order
for that to happen, more new Republican voters must have
come out.

He looks a lot like I imagine you look:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...tz_photo0&e=11

--Blair
"You really should check your facts
before posting."
  #153  
Old November 7th 04, 01:27 PM
Mark Cook
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
...
Mark Cook wrote:

"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
. ..
Mark Cook wrote:
"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
. ..
Mark Cook wrote:
"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
. ..
Mark Cook wrote:
"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
. ..
Mark Cook wrote:
"dgk" wrote in

message
.. .
Blair, I'm new around here. But when people argue that Gore

lost
in
Florida, there is no way to convince them otherwise, facts

be
damned.
Keep up the good fight I suppose, but minds are just

closed.
Troopers
dropping in on elderly black folks, with guns visible, to

warn
them
about absentee voting being dangerous, well, I guess that

is
just
part
of normal Florida voting.

Here we go again, another CLOSED minded Goron. What part of a
PARTIAL
recount do YOU not understand????

Closed minded? All he did was point out that the Governor's
goons were breaking federal law and subverting the

Constitution.

Just like you, he failed to post any facts.

I posted the facts long ago.

No, you lied about the results of the NORC study. That is not

proof.
You
even went as far as making up lies about why they did not check

every
disputed ballot.

Where did I "lie about the results of the NORC study"? I posted

them.

You posted the results of a partial recount by the NORC. They said

that
they
could not determine a winner, yet you lie and claim that they did.

Even
CNN
said that the results of this study was *instructive, but NOT

definitive*.
You are ignoring the facts, and posting only what you want to believe.

No, I said "George Bush did not win Florida" and I posted the
NORC results to show that he did not win Florida, because nobody
won Florida.


Those results do NOT prove that Bush did not win Florida.


Yes, they do. They prove that there's no proof that he won it
at the polls.


I suggest that you read the court decisions on the matter. Gore NEVER made
the claim that all ballots were NOT tabulated. The fact is they were.

Again, you are misrepresenting the facts.

"But no one claims that these ballots have not previously been tabulated;
they were initially read by voting machines at the time of the election, and
thereafter reread by virtue of Florida's automatic recount provision. No one
claims there was any fraud in the election."

http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZC.html

Every ballots was counted. Bush was shown to be the winner. 36 days, and 2
recounts could not prove otherwise. The media recount could NOT prove
otherwise.

"You are too stupid to find the drops."


Bush did win Florida. You have failed to prove otherwise.


No, and I did.


Clearly you do not understand what proof is.

--Blair
"I'd explain it to you,
but I already have."



  #154  
Old November 8th 04, 02:16 AM
Blair P. Houghton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Cook wrote:
"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
. ..
Yes, they do. They prove that there's no proof that he won it
at the polls.


I suggest that you read the court decisions on the matter. Gore NEVER made
the claim that all ballots were NOT tabulated. The fact is they were.


Whether Gore made the claim or not, the only count
certified by the State of Florida was the original count,
which could never have accounted for all of the ballots,
and was considered inaccurate by everyone involved.

Again, you are misrepresenting the facts.


You're spinning in your chair and pretending your idiocy
is the facts.

"But no one claims that these ballots have not previously been tabulated;
they were initially read by voting machines at the time of the election, and
thereafter reread by virtue of Florida's automatic recount provision. No one
claims there was any fraud in the election."

http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZC.html


Not relevant to the fact that Bush didn't win Florida so
much as have the electoral votes handed to him by Supreme
Court fiat.

The ballots were recounted and none of the recounts were
ever included in the certified tally, because federal law
short-circuited Florida law.

Every ballots was counted.


False, and to make that claim you have to be illiterate,
and not just because you pluralized "ballot".

Bush was shown to be the winner. 36 days, and 2
recounts could not prove otherwise. The media recount could NOT prove
otherwise.


You're saying recounts are irrelevant. Which is totally
absurd. Since you've taken to making totally absurd statements,
I'm going to let you keep making them to yourself.

Clearly you do not understand what proof is.


That is a statement you have proved over and over again that you
can not possibly know the meaning of.

--Blair
"Just pull over to the side of the
road and stop crapping your shorts."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
George Bush crashes mountain bike, again dreaded Social Issues 0 July 27th 04 07:04 AM
Lance vs George W Bush John Racing 0 July 20th 04 06:30 AM
Bush crashes mountain biking. Callistus Valerius Racing 36 May 26th 04 04:42 PM
Sierra Nevada - Tioga/Sonora Pass [email protected] Rides 1 November 3rd 03 08:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.