|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
Now that we're past April 1...this is really a question for Sheldon
(RIP). I have a Counterpoint tandem (the original, not a Viewpoint). Spec sheets from later years indicate that the max weight on the front should be about 175 lbs, and total gross vehicle weight 400. New friend in my life. To fit under that total limitation, I would have to have a couple legs removed. Need advice from a Sheldon wannabe (um, other than the obvious) who has real life practical experience with 'bents and other small wheels. Here are pics of the bike. I don't have the specs memorized but they are easy enough to type in from a trip to my basement. http://home.earthlink.net/~veloise/cpoint.htm TIA! --Karen D. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
On Apr 2, 7:44 am, Veloise wrote:
Now that we're past April 1...this is really a question for Sheldon (RIP). I have a Counterpoint tandem (the original, not a Viewpoint). Spec sheets from later years indicate that the max weight on the front should be about 175 lbs, and total gross vehicle weight 400. New friend in my life. To fit under that total limitation, I would have to have a couple legs removed. Need advice from a Sheldon wannabe (um, other than the obvious) who has real life practical experience with 'bents and other small wheels. Here are pics of the bike. I don't have the specs memorized but they are easy enough to type in from a trip to my basement.http://home.earthlink.net/~veloise/cpoint.htm TIA! Well, my small wheel experience is mostly limited to folding bikes. So if you don't mind some speculation... (Of course, if you _did_ mind speculation, you wouldn't post on rec.bicycles!) First, small wheels are significantly stronger than large wheels, if spoke count, spoke gages, rim cross section etc. are equal. I'd be surprised if the wheel itself gave problems in normal riding. If it were to fail, I'd expect it would be in walking-speed turns, when you tend to use the front wheel to muscle the bike around to keep balance. That's the only time I've broken a spoke (a front one) with our conventional tandem. What I'm getting at is that even if the front wheel collapsed, it would happen at maybe 2 mph. For slow speed, out-of-balance "S" turns, you might be putting considerable torsion into the frame. I'd try to keep away from super- slow speed "S" turns. Start off briskly and straight. Keep the weight centered to reduce spoke stress and frame stress. But it looks like the design must really load the headset bearings and the front wheel bearings, as well as the front tire. It may be that the stated weight limits are based on getting acceptable life out of those things. Overloading a bearing really shortens it's life. (It's a cubic relationship - that is, double the load gives one eighth the life.) The good news is those are replaceable components, and they don't usually fail catastrophically. Overall, I'd be inclined to give it a try and keep a close eye on things. I'd start with short rides and build up, but I'd do frequent inspections for as long as you owned the bike. One final comment: your questions are much better discussed on rec.bicycles.tech, so I'm copying this to that forum, too. - Frank Krygowski |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
Veloise wrote:
Now that we're past April 1...this is really a question for Sheldon (RIP). I have a Counterpoint tandem (the original, not a Viewpoint). Spec sheets from later years indicate that the max weight on the front should be about 175 lbs, and total gross vehicle weight 400. New friend in my life. To fit under that total limitation, I would have to have a couple legs removed. Need advice from a Sheldon wannabe (um, other than the obvious) who has real life practical experience with 'bents and other small wheels. Well, I have only been riding small wheel recumbent since the last millennium, so I do not know if I can be of much help. Here are pics of the bike. I don't have the specs memorized but they are easy enough to type in from a trip to my basement. http://home.earthlink.net/~veloise/cpoint.htm The stronger the front wheel the better, and the heavier the rim with more surface area for cooling the better. Something along the lines of a Sun Big City [1] would be a good choice. Yes, it is 600 gm, but this is no place to save weight. As always, proper wheel build is critical. Secondly, you will want a fat tire that can be inflated to high pressure to reduce pinch flatting and thick sidewalls and tread to reduce the potential for cuts and punctures. A BMX freestyle tire such as the Maxxis Hookworm [2] would be a suitable choice. [1] http://www.sun-ringle.com/contentpages/bmx/rims.php5. [2] http://www.maxxis.com/products/bicycle/product_detail.asp?id=90. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
Andreas Oehler wrote:
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:29:23 -0700 (PDT), : On Apr 2, 7:44 am, Veloise wrote: I have a Counterpoint tandem (the original, not a Viewpoint). Spec sheets from later years indicate that the max weight on the front should be about 175 lbs, and total gross vehicle weight 400. New friend in my life. To fit under that total limitation, I would have to have a couple legs removed. Need advice from a Sheldon wannabe (um, other than the obvious) who has real life practical experience with 'bents and other small wheels. I don't have experience with a Couterpoint, but we own a Hase Pino, which is a very similar tandem with a 20" front wheel: http://velo.dyndns.eu/bilder/pino3-kl.jpg http://velo.dyndns.eu/bilder/pino4-kl.jpg I built the wheels myself. The most important thing is a good wheelbuilding with high spoke tension and good quality components. To cope with the high load use the widest available tire and the widest available rim. In our case we bought a Maxxis Hookworm tire 53-406 (53mm wide), which is heavy but nearly indestructable. The rim is a Alex DM24 (24mm inner width) - don't use a narrower rim, because a wide tire on a too narrow rim with such a heavy load will result in poor cornering. The wheel is build around a SON20-disc hub dynamo with 36 spoke holes for 6-hole brake disc in tandem version. This is a very robust hub with allowance to be used on a tandem. Without a disc brake any good quality 36 hole hub will do - maybe Shimano XT or similar. I used strait 2mm spokes by DT - but any other fair quality stainless steal spoke will be OK. The bigger problem is braking. When travelling with the tandem (4 big panniers) we reach over 200kg total wheight and braking hard down some medium hills in the black forest kills the front disc (180mm diameter, Magura): It was faultless on top of the hill but has a permanent "wave" in it down in the valley... I fitted a third brake (rim brake on the 26" back wheel with heavy rim, activated by a bar end switcher) than for this kind of long braking to share the heat. I don't think it would be wise to use the Counterpoint Tandem heavy loaded with just rim brakes in mountainous terrain. At least some kind of "drag brake" on the rear hub should be added. It is possible to overheat rims/tires on long descends with just a single person on a bike with 700c wheels. It would be stupid to try the same with double the wheigt but a smaller front wheel! First, small wheels are significantly stronger than large wheels, if spoke count, spoke gages, rim cross section etc. are equal. This is true. But with this kind of tandems there is realy a lot of load on the front wheel. Also the front rim brake is able to dump immense amounts of heat into the metal without lifting the rear wheel. So a heavy wide rim with a deep profile is recommended. The front tire also have to cope with the load, the braking forces and the brake heat - so something heavier is better than a skinny racing tire... Tire and rim should allow high pressure. Another option would be to build the front wheel around an Arai drag brake and have it operated by a bar-end, and also have the regular rim brake. Green Gear (aka Bike Friday) has build some of their tandems this way. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
I didn't get the question part of your post.
I heard that you wanna ride around on a bike while being over the manufacturer's recommended maximum load. I heard that you asked for advice but no specific question. Are you looking for someone to sue if the spokes bend or the brakes fail? if so - get bent, if not get 'bent. Or you wondering whether to ride it or buy a new one? Who would ever try to talk you outta buying a new bike. I go 'round on a 'bent with a 16" front wheel, me and my kit are pretty far over the manufacturer's published limit (well south of 400lbs tho - but I'm solo). I tweaked the front rim once, but I'm not certain that the size of the wheel had anything to do with it (got it caught in railroad tracks at a really shallow angle). I break spokes on the rear wheel way more frequently and it's a 26". I've always broken spokes on every bike I've ever owned - I guess if I re-laced the wheels every 15 - 20kmi or so I probably wouldn't. I do find the small front wheel kind of annoying sometimes - it gets squirrelly on the least little crack in the road. I often wish I had bought the larger model with the 20" wheel up front (my x seam is right on the cusp). Someday I'm gonna either gonna go high racer or long wheelbase and be done with the little bugger (note not wedgie - there ain't no going back). The generic advise I got for is to ride it and see what, if anything, breaks. With more than 400lbs coming down a big hill you people could really be going fast, way faster than it takes to make me pee, I would want extra brakes, a drag brake or something maybe. But I don't know nothin' and I ain't got nothin' worth suing for. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
DennisTheBald wrote:
I didn't get the question part of your post. I heard that you wanna ride around on a bike while being over the manufacturer's recommended maximum load. I heard that you asked for advice but no specific question. Are you looking for someone to sue if the spokes bend or the brakes fail? if so - get bent, if not get 'bent.[...] For what its worth, Counterpoint went out of business because of a "nuisance" lawsuit. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
On Apr 2, 7:44 pm, Veloise wrote:
Now that we're past April 1...this is really a question for Sheldon (RIP). RIP?? Did Sheldon die?? I have a Counterpoint tandem (the original, not a Viewpoint). Spec sheets from later years indicate that the max weight on the front should be about 175 lbs, and total gross vehicle weight 400. New friend in my life. To fit under that total limitation, I would have to have a couple legs removed. Need advice from a Sheldon wannabe (um, other than the obvious) who has real life practical experience with 'bents and other small wheels. Here are pics of the bike. I don't have the specs memorized but they are easy enough to type in from a trip to my basement.http://home.earthlink.net/~veloise/cpoint.htm TIA! --Karen D. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
Interesting comments, all.
Mine is an original Opus (from the Jim Weaver years). It was only after becoming a rep for the bike (during the Kelvin era) that I knew anything about a weight limit. My proposed team is not the largest/ heaviest I've ever seen on a 'point. As a card-carrying member of the design's fan club (since 1983), I am aware of the nuisance lawsuit. And I've heard that Jim was persuaded to get back into the bicycle gig sometime within this decade. I don't plan to do loaded touring in the Rockies or on any other steep slopes; thinking more about the flat streets in Holland, Mich during Tulip Time. I'd rather commission a sturdier front wheel than get a different bike. (And finding a different navigator is out of the question. Hey, while I'm at it...plentyoffish.com is the only dating site anyone needs!) "R.I.P." after someone's name generally means that the person has moved to another place. Sheldon has been all over teh internets for weeks. Thanks again! --Karen D. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
I have a Counterpoint tandem (the original, not a Viewpoint). Spec sheets from later years indicate that the max weight on the front should be about 175 lbs, and total gross vehicle weight 400. New friend in my life. To fit under that total limitation, I would have to have a couple legs removed. Why not call up Angle Lake in Seattle/Tacoma, they were the Counterpoint dealers for many years. Used to be at 206-878-7457 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Small front wheel question
Doug wrote:
Why not call up Angle Lake in Seattle/Tacoma, they were the Counterpoint dealers for many years. Used to be at 206-878-7457 That may be. The person handling CP, Kelvin, moved to Colorado, and CP distributorship moved too. Then the lawsuit happened, time passed, Bilenky bought the patent and started making Viewpoints. (Midwest Tandem Rally 1997.) Bilenky used to provide an incredibly low- trafficked owners' forum, which is where I found my used bike several months after it was listed for sale. See my post from a couple days ago. I really doubt that Whoever Answers The Phone at a LBS would be of much help. (Their website is remarkably devoid of content at of this posting. http://www.anglelake.com/index.html) A little googling turns up many references to presentations at adaptive recreation meetings and Jim Weaver as though he's still as active with it as in the 80's. My own website is probably the most extensive resource for the bike (I am serious about acting as a switchboard for buyers and sellers). What I'm looking for is recommendations on front wheel designs. HTH --Karen D. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Small front wheel, reversed fork, must be for motor-pacing | [email protected] | Techniques | 7 | February 28th 08 12:22 PM |
New front chain rings - not able to use small one | Peter Scandrett[_2_] | UK | 17 | January 7th 08 12:11 AM |
Front Wheel 24 spoke question | rs | Techniques | 9 | October 29th 05 03:13 PM |
Q: Chain noisy on front big ring/all rear cogs, silent on front small/all rear cogs | App | Techniques | 6 | October 12th 05 02:01 PM |
Front light bracket too small. Help! | Dene Wilby | UK | 19 | October 31st 03 08:34 PM |