Government planning to ban parking on pavements

On 08/09/2020 22:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:01:34 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 08/09/2020 00:59, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 22:00:03 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 07/09/2020 15:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:

The car has to be parked somewhere. On the pavement is out of the
way of other traffic, therefore the best place to park.* If you
don't like it, build more car parks,

Keeping the pavement clear and parking on the road saves the
council from putting in traffic calming.

No it doesn't.* Firstly I don't slow down for parked cars, secondly
traffic calming is just not needed under any circumstances, thirdly
all it does is damage suspension, wheel alignment, tyres, etc,
causing all cars to be unroadworthy.

If drivers don't want traffic calming, there is a very simple solution
which rests in their hands.

No there isn't.* The government puts that **** on the roads whether we
like it or not.

It's not a matter of what drivers think. It's a matter of how drivers
behave.

do something useful with my road tax and fuel duty

If you can afford a car the government has to claw back your
benefits somehow.

Almost everyone has a car. Why are they stealing money from
everyone?

...because almost everyone has a car.

About time they stole from cyclists.

Nobody is forcing to drive everywhere.

On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:02:49 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 08/09/2020 22:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:01:34 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 08/09/2020 00:59, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 22:00:03 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 07/09/2020 15:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:

The car has to be parked somewhere. On the pavement is out of the
way of other traffic, therefore the best place to park. If you
don't like it, build more car parks,

Keeping the pavement clear and parking on the road saves the
council from putting in traffic calming.

No it doesn't. Firstly I don't slow down for parked cars, secondly
traffic calming is just not needed under any circumstances, thirdly
all it does is damage suspension, wheel alignment, tyres, etc,
causing all cars to be unroadworthy.

If drivers don't want traffic calming, there is a very simple solution
which rests in their hands.

No there isn't. The government puts that **** on the roads whether we
like it or not.

It's not a matter of what drivers think. It's a matter of how drivers
behave.

Awwww you poor little snowflake, are they intimidating you? It's you with the problem, not them. I'm perfectly fine cycling in heavy traffic.

do something useful with my road tax and fuel duty

If you can afford a car the government has to claw back your
benefits somehow.

Almost everyone has a car. Why are they stealing money from
everyone?

...because almost everyone has a car.

About time they stole from cyclists.

Nobody is forcing to drive everywhere.

Of course not, we're all free to cycle 100s of miles, get there late, tired, wet, and not be able to carry lots of stuff. Get into the 21st century you silly neanderthal.

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 00:02:49 +0100, TMS320, another brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile ASSHOLE, blathered:


It's not a matter of what drivers think. It's a matter of how drivers
behave.

Nope, you senile asshole! This here is ONLY a matter of feeding the troll,
you troll-feeding senile cretin!

On 9/09/20 12:05 pm, Commander Kinsey wrote:
you silly neanderthal.

Thanks greatly for that EXCELLENT compliment coming from YOU -
especially as it comes from YOU.
Now please ejaculate to me the further great honour of thick-headed
trog. Please?

It really is a very great compliment to be called a silly neanderthal
by YOU. Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle, a very convenient delightful economical
viable means of transport.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

PS neanderthals had bigger brains than sapiens.

On 9/09/20 7:05 pm, Peeler wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 00:02:49 +0100, TMS320, another brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile ASSHOLE, blathered:


It's not a matter of what drivers think. It's a matter of how drivers
behave.

Nope, you senile asshole! This here is ONLY a matter of feeding the troll,
you troll-feeding senile cretin!



Typically, a Peeler will releases less than a teaspoon of gunk from the
100 or so slime glands that line his flanks. And in less than half a
second, that little amount will expand by 10,000 times—enough to fill a
sizable bucket.

On 09/09/2020 01:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:02:49 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 22:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:01:34 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:59, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 22:00:03 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 07/09/2020 15:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:

The car has to be parked somewhere. On the pavement is out of the
way of other traffic, therefore the best place to park.* If you
don't like it, build more car parks,

Keeping the pavement clear and parking on the road saves the
council from putting in traffic calming.

No it doesn't.* Firstly I don't slow down for parked cars, secondly
traffic calming is just not needed under any circumstances, thirdly
all it does is damage suspension, wheel alignment, tyres, etc,
causing all cars to be unroadworthy.

If drivers don't want traffic calming, there is a very simple solution
which rests in their hands.

No there isn't.* The government puts that **** on the roads whether we
like it or not.

It's not a matter of what drivers think. It's a matter of how drivers
behave.

Awwww you poor little snowflake, are they intimidating you? It's you
with the problem, not them. I'm perfectly fine cycling in heavy traffic.

Then it's necessary to assume that complaining about traffic calming is
one your life's pleasures and you would be bereft if there wasn't any.

(btw, I can cycle over speed bumps without falling off.)

do something useful with my road tax and fuel duty

If you can afford a car the government has to claw back your
benefits somehow.

Almost everyone has a car. Why are they stealing money from
everyone?

...because almost everyone has a car.

About time they stole from cyclists.

Nobody is forcing to drive everywhere.

Of course not, we're all free to cycle 100s of miles, get there late,
tired, wet, and not be able to carry lots of stuff. Get into the 21st
century you silly neanderthal.

Yes, you have the choice to cycle 100's of miles - apart from not being
allowed on many high quality roads. If you want the luxuries, expect to
pay extra. That's how things always work.

On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:24:12 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 09/09/2020 01:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:02:49 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 22:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 09:01:34 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:59, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 22:00:03 +0100, TMS320 wrote:
On 07/09/2020 15:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:

The car has to be parked somewhere. On the pavement is out of the
way of other traffic, therefore the best place to park. If you
don't like it, build more car parks,

Keeping the pavement clear and parking on the road saves the
council from putting in traffic calming.

No it doesn't. Firstly I don't slow down for parked cars, secondly
traffic calming is just not needed under any circumstances, thirdly
all it does is damage suspension, wheel alignment, tyres, etc,
causing all cars to be unroadworthy.

If drivers don't want traffic calming, there is a very simple solution
which rests in their hands.

No there isn't. The government puts that **** on the roads whether we
like it or not.

It's not a matter of what drivers think. It's a matter of how drivers
behave.

Awwww you poor little snowflake, are they intimidating you? It's you
with the problem, not them. I'm perfectly fine cycling in heavy traffic.

Then it's necessary to assume that complaining about traffic calming is
one your life's pleasures and you would be bereft if there wasn't any.

I complain for a reason, it damages suspension, whether you're speeding or not. Ask any mechanic who works in a garage where there are lots of speedbumps. They can see the number of replaced suspension parts skyrocketing when the bumps are installed. It makes up a good proportion of their income.

(btw, I can cycle over speed bumps without falling off.)

And yet you're scared of cars closer than 1.5 metres?

do something useful with my road tax and fuel duty

If you can afford a car the government has to claw back your
benefits somehow.

Almost everyone has a car. Why are they stealing money from
everyone?

...because almost everyone has a car.

About time they stole from cyclists.

Nobody is forcing to drive everywhere.

Of course not, we're all free to cycle 100s of miles, get there late,
tired, wet, and not be able to carry lots of stuff. Get into the 21st
century you silly neanderthal.

Yes, you have the choice to cycle 100's of miles - apart from not being
allowed on many high quality roads. If you want the luxuries, expect to
pay extra. That's how things always work.

And how would a high quality road make you manage 100 miles in the time alloted to get to the destination? And how much weight and bulk can you carry on a bicycle? And do you expect the frail, elderly, disabled, etc to use bicycles? Get yourself into the 21st century FFS.

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 21:19:59 +1200, Peter Keller, the notorious masochistic
gay troll-lover, blathered again:


Thanks greatly for that EXCELLENT compliment coming from YOU -
especially as it comes from YOU.
Now please ejaculate to me the further great honour of thick-headed
trog. Please?

What a ridiculous dumb gay masochist! LOL

FLUSH the rest of the usual sick gay ****

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:24:12 +0100, TMS320, another brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile ASSHOLE, blathered:


Then it's necessary to assume that complaining about traffic calming is
one your life's pleasures and you would be bereft if there wasn't any.

His MAIN pleasure in his sick life is baiting all you senile assholes on all
these groups, you troll-feeding senile cretin!

On 10/09/20 1:41 am, Peeler wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 21:19:59 +1200, Peter Keller, the notorious masochistic
gay troll-lover, blathered again:


Thanks greatly for that EXCELLENT compliment coming from YOU -
especially as it comes from YOU.
Now please ejaculate to me the further great honour of thick-headed
trog. Please?

What a ridiculous dumb gay masochist! LOL

FLUSH the rest of the usual sick gay ****


Peeler's slime looks revolting, but it’s also one of nature’s more
wondrous substances, unlike anything else that’s been concocted by
either evolution or engineers.