Another attack on a cyclist

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/

"Brian Robertson" wrote in message ...

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/

As you've been able to deduce that it was an attack on the cyclist, and
therefore being intentional, you've obviously got more info on this incident
than the paper has.
Would you care to let us know what extra evidence you have, or did you just
make it up, thus confirming your membership of the psycholist club?

On 19/08/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:


"Brian Robertson" wrote in message
...

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/


As you've been able to deduce that it was an attack on the cyclist, and
therefore being intentional, you've obviously got more info on this
incident than the paper has.
Would you care to let us know what extra evidence you have, or did you
just make it up, thus confirming your membership of the psycholist club?

Have a ever denied that I am a member of the psycholist club?

"Brian Robertson" wrote in message ...

On 19/08/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:


"Brian Robertson" wrote in message
...

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/


As you've been able to deduce that it was an attack on the cyclist, and
therefore being intentional, you've obviously got more info on this
incident than the paper has.
Would you care to let us know what extra evidence you have, or did you
just make it up, thus confirming your membership of the psycholist club?

Have a ever denied that I am a member of the psycholist club?

I don't for one minute think you'd be able to. From most of the crap you
post on here I would say you are a five star psycholist.
( That's using the McDonalds system, by the way, not the US General's one )

On 19/08/2013 12:01, Partac wrote:


"Brian Robertson" wrote in message ...

On 19/08/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:


"Brian Robertson" wrote in message
...

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/



As you've been able to deduce that it was an attack on the cyclist, and
therefore being intentional, you've obviously got more info on this
incident than the paper has.
Would you care to let us know what extra evidence you have, or did you
just make it up, thus confirming your membership of the psycholist club?

Have a ever denied that I am a member of the psycholist club?

I don't for one minute think you'd be able to. From most of the crap you
post on here I would say you are a five star psycholist.
( That's using the McDonalds system, by the way, not the US General's one )

Well I don't really cycle much these days (unfortunately) so maybe I
just support the under dog against bullies.

On 19/08/2013 09:23, Brian Robertson wrote:
Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/


you mean that there was a crash involving a cyclist and a car. You have
no idea as to the causes of the crash. The possibility that the crash
was a deliberate action by the car driver is such a low probability
that it can realistically be discounted, and your suggestion that it is
could, might be considered as actionable libel. The likelihood is: that
one party or both made a mistake and a crash ensued. There are other
scenarios, all of which are far more likely than any form of deliberate
attack by the car driver.

On 19/08/2013 11:36, Brian Robertson wrote:

On 19/08/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:
"Brian Robertson" wrote in message

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/

As you've been able to deduce that it was an attack on the cyclist, and
therefore being intentional, you've obviously got more info on this
incident than the paper has.
Would you care to let us know what extra evidence you have, or did you
just make it up, thus confirming your membership of the psycholist club?

Have a ever denied that I am a member of the psycholist club?

To your credit, you have not.

You have also been more frank than most of us about your past.

"Brian Robertson" wrote in message
...
Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been brought
to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/

Very sad story and I hope the old chap makes a full recovery. I always
admire older people still cycling and being active.

It turns out that there was no attack at all. He was hit accidentally by a
driver.

You are adotping Doug Bollen-style reporting.

"Brian Robertson" wrote in message
...
On 19/08/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:


"Brian Robertson" wrote in message
...

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still
be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been
brought to an end by a killer car.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/


As you've been able to deduce that it was an attack on the cyclist, and
therefore being intentional, you've obviously got more info on this
incident than the paper has.
Would you care to let us know what extra evidence you have, or did you
just make it up, thus confirming your membership of the psycholist club?

Have a ever denied that I am a member of the psycholist club?

You don't need to. It's obvious what you are.

On Monday, 19 August 2013 13:32:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
On 19/08/2013 09:23, Brian Robertson wrote:

Game old boy still riding a bike when he is 83. Don't think I will still

be in a saddle when I am that age. Shame that it has probably been

brought to an end by a killer car.



http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10619...tside_Butlins/





you mean that there was a crash involving a cyclist and a car. You have


Do you mean the legal Thing, the Cyclist, or perhaps a human being?


no idea as to the causes of the crash. The possibility that the crash

was a deliberate action by the car driver is such a low probability


Are you sure that you could not use Acting?


that it can realistically be discounted,

You mean that realistic punitive damages (considering that licensed driving needs encouragement) would be outweighed by costs to the Crown.

and your suggestion that it is

could, might be considered as actionable libel. The likelihood is: that

one party or both made a mistake and a crash ensued. There are other

scenarios,

ACT 1, scene 2, bring it on.

all of which are far more likely than any form of deliberate

attack by the car driver.

You mean, A driving licence is a licence to kill!