|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him,
with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was right on the money. Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. more there Bill C |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C wrote:
While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was right on the money. Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
"RicodJour" wrote in message
... | On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C wrote: | While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, | with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was | right on the money. | Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being | mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. | | http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p | | New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive | Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis | Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 | Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally | rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a | government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a | "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which | has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. | | That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way | saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human | activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why | you're awarding the medal... | | R Agreed. Biofuels, when not derived from waste product, are an abomination and an insult to humanity. The idea that it's more important to feed our cars than our mouths... what could be more absurd? And not only do the economics not work out, but it's tough to show that you're actually gaining energy too, after you factor in everything that goes into growing crops. But as you say, what does this have to do with awarding points to TK? His attitude is simply that global warming itself is a myth. The only reason he'd care about biofuels is if it puts cheaper gas into his tank. Not that there's anything wrong with that concept, to a point. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
On 6/19/08 9:47 AM, in article ,
"Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote: "RicodJour" wrote in message ... | On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C wrote: | While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, | with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was | right on the money. | Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being | mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. | | http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p | | New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive | Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis | Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 | Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally | rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a | government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a | "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which | has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. | | That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way | saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human | activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why | you're awarding the medal... | | R Agreed. Biofuels, when not derived from waste product, are an abomination and an insult to humanity. The idea that it's more important to feed our cars than our mouths... what could be more absurd? And not only do the economics not work out, but it's tough to show that you're actually gaining energy too, after you factor in everything that goes into growing crops. But as you say, what does this have to do with awarding points to TK? His attitude is simply that global warming itself is a myth. The only reason he'd care about biofuels is if it puts cheaper gas into his tank. Not that there's anything wrong with that concept, to a point. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com You guys are so full of crap and yourselves! HE SAID... (and I agreed) "This biofuels **** is gonna take all the corn the USA gives to feed the worlds hungry and they are gonna starve!!!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 20, 6:03 pm, ST wrote:
HE SAID... (and I agreed) "This biofuels **** is gonna take all the corn the USA gives to feed the worlds hungry and they are gonna starve!!!" That's only part of it. The rest of the world is going to plow under their crops, plant corn and make ethanol and starve themselves. That should take some of the guilt off of the fat white guys and put it on some fat black guys. I feel ever so much better! R |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Kveck was exactly right. OT
On Jun 20, 3:03*pm, ST wrote:
On 6/19/08 9:47 AM, in article , "Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote: "RicodJour" wrote in message .... | On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C wrote: | While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, | with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was | right on the money. | *Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being | mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. | | http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p | | New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive | Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis | Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 | Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally | rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a | government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a | "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which | has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. | | That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way | saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human | activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why | you're awarding the medal... | | R Agreed. Biofuels, when not derived from waste product, are an abomination and an insult to humanity. The idea that it's more important to feed our cars than our mouths... what could be more absurd? And not only do the economics not work out, but it's tough to show that you're actually gaining energy too, after you factor in everything that goes into growing crops.. But as you say, what does this have to do with awarding points to TK? His attitude is simply that global warming itself is a myth. The only reason he'd care about biofuels is if it puts cheaper gas into his tank. Not that there's anything wrong with that concept, to a point. --Mike-- * * Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com You guys are so full of crap and yourselves! HE SAID... (and I agreed) "This biofuels **** is gonna take all the corn the USA gives to feed the worlds hungry and they are gonna starve!!!" He MAY have said something LIKE THAT, but he didn't say THAT. Don't put something in quotes unless it's truly a quote. On the other hand, a cursory search turns up a different poster who was "exactly right": "Discussion subject changed to "Nascar considering starving the world" by Howard Kveck" That was a post about NASCAR considering a switch to ethanol. -Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
ST wrote:
You guys are so full of crap and yourselves! HE SAID... (and I agreed) "This biofuels **** is gonna take all the corn the USA gives to feed the worlds hungry and they are gonna starve!!!" Hasn't happened. Even though you've cherry picked his statements, you still haven't come up with one that's demonstrably true. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
On 6/27/08 9:11 AM, in article ,
"Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: You guys are so full of crap and yourselves! HE SAID... (and I agreed) "This biofuels **** is gonna take all the corn the USA gives to feed the worlds hungry and they are gonna starve!!!" Hasn't happened. Even though you've cherry picked his statements, you still haven't come up with one that's demonstrably true. You are such a koolaid idiot............ http://www.un.org/News/briefings/doc...iegler.doc.htm http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...arving_people_ are_a_crime.html U.N.: Biofuels Starving People, Are a "Crime Against Humanity" Biofuel Growth Causing Starvation |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 9:47*am, RicodJour wrote:
That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate discussion. Just about everyone insisted that biofuels had no, or negligible impact on worldwide food resources. So much for my troll index with the first troll in ages. Bill C |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 10:23*am, Bill C wrote:
On Jun 19, 9:47*am, RicodJour wrote: That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate discussion. snip Dumbass - You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be less corn for food. Duh. And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|