French Get A Dose Of The New Lance Armstrong

R Brickston wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:53:20 -0500, ZeMascouflatte wrote:


In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:


Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village idiot,
confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance will be
spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid can
morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the freedom
fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to stand
for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your country right
now functions according to the lowest common denominator principle.


Hey, Thanks! You, Michael Moore and Maureen Dowd helped swing the
votes that got Bush his victories.

Actually.. I think that was Diebold that did that work...

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

Gee, someone ought to investigate that and speak up if they have proof.

Oh, wait.



Oh... and you are? Oh yeah... another nobody...

In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village idiot,
confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance will be
spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid can
morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the freedom
fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to stand
for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your country right
now functions according to the lowest common denominator principle.

In article ,
R Brickston rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@ wrote:

Hey, Thanks! You, Michael Moore and Maureen Dowd helped swing the
votes that got Bush his victories.

you are confused my dear. and do not associate me with these characters,
i dispense my own brand of anger.

ZeMascouflatte wrote:
In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village idiot,
confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance will be
spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid can
morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the freedom
fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to stand
for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your country right
now functions according to the lowest common denominator principle.

Geez, that was a little over the top, huh? Are you planning to repost
this on Kos Kidz? But seriously, the French vetoed a UN censure of
Israel, so maybe they're coming around. Next thing yah know they'll be
naming a "soccer" stadium after some Texan.

Sadly, the fellow is probably right about the accusations. It's as
predictable as the sunrise.

Geez, that was a little over the top, huh?

i don't think so. it's always the same thing. some kind of brain washed
spewing the same stupidities. it's enough after a while, and not fun in
any case. stereotypes (talking about snail soup! like if snails were
prepared as a soup...), cliches and bias...

this on Kos Kidz? But seriously, the French vetoed a UN censure of
Israel, so maybe they're coming around. Next thing yah know they'll be

or maybe they are for a diplomatic solution, instead of bombing and
destruction, something easier to do but that never solves anything in
the long term.

naming a "soccer" stadium after some Texan.

have you ever been to france? thousands of avenues, streets, schools
etc... are named after americans. but you may wait a while before you
can find anything named after the current president.

Sadly, the fellow is probably right about the accusations. It's as

sadly, he jumped to his keyboard before reading the french press (if he
could), which can be read on-line. l'equipe has a front page title on
landis: "tour d'honneur de landis", playing on the tour de france, to
recognize landis as the winner "who deserves" the victory in this year
amazing race. le monde and liberation, two influential national
newspapers had title of the same vein.
so please, enough bashing.

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:26:37 -0500, ZeMascouflatte wrote:


have you ever been to france? thousands of avenues, streets, schools
etc... are named after americans.

Yeah, like Mumia, the cop-killer and black racist.

In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Yeah, like Mumia, the cop-killer and black racist.

well, poor dimwitted asshole, there is really no point in trying to
communicate with you. welcome to my filter list.

ZeMascouflatte wrote:
In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Yeah, like Mumia, the cop-killer and black racist.

well, poor dimwitted asshole, there is really no point in trying to
communicate with you. welcome to my filter list.


Here's a little of Chomsky on Bush:

I suspect he is just playing the role for which he is being trained by
his handlers, and that the religious fanaticism is mostly part of a
plan to throw a little red meat to a substantial constituency. The US
is one of the most extreme religious fundamentalist societies in the
world. It is hard to believe that the actual planners - Cheney,
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Powell, etc. - take any of this seriously. As
for "neoconservatism," it is not clear what the term is supposed to
mean. In practice it is the program of radical statist reactionaries,
who believe that the US should rule the world, by force if necessary,
in the interests of the narrow sectors of concentrated private power
and wealth that they represent, and that the powerful state they forge
should serve those interests, not the interests of the public, who are
to be frightened into submission while the progressive legislation and
achievements of popular struggle of the past century are dismantled,
along with the democratic culture that sustained them. Within elite
sectors, there is a great deal of concern over their brazen arrogance,
remarkable incompetence, and willingness to increase serious threats to
the country and to transfer a huge burden to coming generations for
short-term gain. Their war in Iraq, for example, was strongly opposed
by leading sectors of the foreign policy elite, and perhaps even more
strikingly, the corporate world. But the same sectors will continue to
support the Bush circles, strongly. It is using state power to lavish
huge gifts on them, and they basically share the underlying premises
even if they are concerned about the practice and the irrationality of
the actors, and the dangers they pose.