|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
In article
, Bill C wrote: On Jun 21, 10:08*pm, Howard Kveck wrote: I IMO that doesn't apply to you and TK though. The, I want to choose the words carefully here, brutally hostile, psychopathic maybe, totally irrational reaction you provoke from him just for living puts you in a different situation. I'm really surprised that he doesn't react that way to more people too. I'm not sure what, in particular, makes you the target since others have been much nastier to him, with much less provocation. TK has never been as mad at HK as I have. I got so mad, I sent Kveck a John Tesh CD. I guess in this case, in particular, when he is right I feel he needs to be recognized for it. It's intellectually honest, it sets whoever does it apart, it validates their integrity. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
TK has never been as mad at HK as I have. I got so mad, I sent Kveck a John Tesh CD. To be really effective you should have sent him a best of Rush Limbaugh along with the Tesh cd. However the UN might object. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
Donald Munro wrote:
Ryan Cousineau wrote: TK has never been as mad at HK as I have. I got so mad, I sent Kveck a John Tesh CD. To be really effective you should have sent him a best of Rush Limbaugh along with the Tesh cd. However the UN might object. I've got TK killfiled, so if he says something worthwhile I'll probably miss it. I just wish all you retards would stop following his stuff up, so that the chance that I'd miss it would be better. Bob Schwartz |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
On Jun 22, 4:08*pm, Bob Schwartz
wrote: I've got TK killfiled, so if he says something worthwhile I'll probably miss it. I just wish all you retards would stop following his stuff up, so that the chance that I'd miss it would be better. Bob Schwartz Guess you don't want the links for folks like the Traditional Values Coalition, and the rest of those folks? They're out there, they pay politicians and think-tanks, and they vote. You got TK killed, but some of the **** they come up with makes him look liberal. People know about Westboro Baptist, but they are nothing. Lots of groups out there, real close to them in ideology, that are "respectable" and massively larger. Like TK they grab selected quotes, actions, etc...to paint a distorted picture, and there is plenty of that to use that's accurate. Michelle Obama's "proud" quote is a perfect example. Scary thing is they are on both fringes, and do matter. Bill C |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
In article ],
Ryan Cousineau wrote: In article , Bill C wrote: On Jun 21, 10:08*pm, Howard Kveck wrote: I IMO that doesn't apply to you and TK though. The, I want to choose the words carefully here, brutally hostile, psychopathic maybe, totally irrational reaction you provoke from him just for living puts you in a different situation. I'm really surprised that he doesn't react that way to more people too. I'm not sure what, in particular, makes you the target since others have been much nastier to him, with much less provocation. TK has never been as mad at HK as I have. I got so mad, I sent Kveck a John Tesh CD. I still don't know what I did to you to deserve having my home sullied with that (heh). -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
In article ,
Kurgan Gringioni wrote: On Jun 21, 7:08*pm, Howard Kveck wrote: He claims, for example, to have an engineering degree from the USAF Dumbass - That's his engineering degree?! omg. hahahahahahahahahaha! Jesus. If you think that's funny, you'll get a huge laugh out of this (for two reasons): http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...0d210fe8a95a49 -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
On Jun 22, 1:34*pm, Bill C wrote:
*Michelle Obama's "proud" quote is a perfect example. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001...74602#25274602 |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT
Bill C wrote:
Dumbass Ya know you're ****ing up. You do it pretty often too. It's hard to play the asshole blowhard type when you post good, well thought out, researched, accurate ****, and solidly based opinions anytime you aren't purposely yanking someones chain. Monkeyboy does a lot of that too. You think Henry's getting soft? |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
In article ,
Bill C wrote: TK's point was that biofuels are bad for the world's food supply. I wasn't sure about that then, and still am not sure about it, but lots of supposedly credible people are agreeing with him on that point. That's almost always the point with TK. There's a solid kernel of information there, then it explodes into something else, which it did here, but that doesn't invalidate his original point. More research may do that. I guess in this case, in particular, when he is right I feel he needs to be recognized for it. It's intellectually honest, it sets whoever does it apart, it validates their integrity. I see it very differently. He may have more or less said that biofuels would have an effect on world food supplies but that wasn't the point he was making. His point was (once again) that liberals/progressives are bad people. Based on my reading of TK's posts, he couldn't care less if people in Africa or Asia are going hungry, except insofar as the darkies might get mad and rise up and inconvenience him in some way. The two most important things in Tom's life are 1) making himself seem important, bigger, stronger, smarter and more moral than everyone else, and 2) bashing liberals (which is a means to the first). This is how the logic works: if the people who advocate the use of biofuel didn't foresee that it would lead to food supply problems, they're stupid. If those food supply issues lead to problems in less advantaged countries, then it's a simple step to consider that "genocide" and everyone knows genocide is evil. So the people who advocate biofuels are both stupid and evil. That means every cause they support is equally stupid and evil. The main thing he was trying to do was associate biofuel advocacy with was global warming and we all know that Tom is a global warming denier. Therefore, anyone who would advocate the use of biofuels (which in Tom's simplistic worldview is everyone who ever disagreed with him) is an immoral global warming hysteric and liar and Tom WINS AGAIN!!! So saying he was right about something that was a peripheral issue to his main point is like saying that his use of the word 'the' was right and he was correct about whatever thing he used it in. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
TK was exactly right. OT weaseling Mea Culpa
On Jun 22, 9:35*pm, Howard Kveck wrote:
In article , *Bill C wrote: *TK's point was that biofuels are bad for the world's food supply. I wasn't sure about that then, and still am not sure about it, but lots of supposedly credible people are agreeing with him on that point. *That's almost always the point with TK. There's a solid kernel of information there, then it explodes into something else, which it did here, but that doesn't invalidate his original point. More research may do that. *I guess in this case, in particular, when he is right I feel he needs to be recognized for it. It's intellectually honest, it sets whoever does it apart, it validates their integrity. * *I see it very differently. He may have more or less said that biofuels would have an effect on world food supplies but that wasn't the point he was making. His point was (once again) that liberals/progressives are bad people. Based on my reading of TK's posts, he couldn't care less if people in Africa or Asia are going hungry, except insofar as the darkies might get mad and rise up and inconvenience him in some way. * *The two most important things in Tom's life are 1) making himself seem important, bigger, stronger, smarter and more moral than everyone else, and 2) bashing liberals (which is a means to the first). This is how the logic works: if the people who advocate the use of biofuel didn't foresee that it would lead to food supply problems, they're stupid. If those food supply issues lead to problems in less advantaged countries, then it's a simple step to consider that "genocide" and everyone knows genocide is evil. So the people who advocate biofuels are both stupid and evil. That means every cause they support is equally stupid and evil. The main thing he was trying to do was associate biofuel advocacy with was global warming and we all know that Tom is a global warming denier. Therefore, anyone who would advocate the use of biofuels (which in Tom's simplistic worldview is everyone who ever disagreed with him) is an immoral global warming hysteric and liar and Tom WINS AGAIN!!! * *So saying he was right about something that was a peripheral issue to his main point is like saying that his use of the word 'the' was right and he was correct about whatever thing he used it in. -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * tanx, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Howard * * * * * * * * * *The bloody pubs are bloody dull * * * * * * * * * *The bloody clubs are bloody full * * * * * * * * * *Of bloody girls and bloody guys * * * * * * * * * *With bloody murder in their eyes * * * * * * * * * * *remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? Hard to argue against your case for him using everything to further his politics, accurate or not. He does everything you say, I'm just not sure what's cause and what's effect. On politics he's on the same plane as the folks trotting out Bush is Hitler, and this is a Nazi police State hysteria we keep hearing too. They don't want to hear the reality either, because it doesn't fit their wishes. Anyone who disagrees is an idiot, or worse. Noone's actually listening, looking, and learning. It's all about ideology and propaganda. Sweden is "1984", Bob Barr is a Libertarian???? Obama says we should be use the Nuremburg trails as a guide. Well they have been illegal under International law for decades. Those nice tolerant EU folks who savaged the US on immigration are doing this: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i...eQsVAD91CL8284 http://www.mercurynews.com/nationworld/ci_9647726 and we wont even get into McCain's complete dive into the Bush agenda. Everyone needs an oil well in their yard, and NO you don't need no stinkin' National Parks, they belong to the real Americans, the oil, gas, mining, and timber companies, damnit! I'll be not voting at all this time. Mass. will go Obama by a landslide so JT need not fear that I'm gonna cost him the election, as it did against Bush both times. That is a big factor in my decisions BTW. So TK really isn't that odd, unfortunately. Maybe global warming isn't such a bad thing after all. Bill C |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|