|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How fast is too fast (to breathe)?
How long does it take for the lungs to transfer "sufficient" or
"optimal" O2 and CO2 to/from the blood? I watch people on TV climbing Everest and they don't seem to be breathing very fast. When I ride at altitude (8000' plus) I take approx. 120 breaths/minute. It seems to work for me, but is much faster than other riders/athletes. Am I just moving air without purpose? -- Lynn Wallace If FDR fought fascism the way Bush fights terrorism, we'd all be speaking German now. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How fast is too fast (to breathe)?
Raptor wrote:
How long does it take for the lungs to transfer "sufficient" or "optimal" O2 and CO2 to/from the blood? I watch people on TV climbing Everest and they don't seem to be breathing very fast. When I ride at altitude (8000' plus) I take approx. 120 breaths/minute. It seems to work for me, but is much faster than other riders/athletes. Am I just moving air without purpose? Bird with talons, O2/CO2 exchange is done mostly at the surface area of the lungs and therefore likewise only at the surface area of any given breath volume (not sure how deep the exchange dips into lung volume surface). I'm not sure of the optimal rate vs. volume trade-off one should strive for to keep their lung exchange most efficient. My guess though is that you might be chasing a red herring. I think your blood is the rate-limiting factor in circulating oxygen to the body, and not the amount of O2 absorbed in the lungs. So your question might only apply to someone who was on EPO or transfusions. You should get on a stationary bike and only breathe pure O2 (usually available for free from your local rescue squad if you have your own O2 tank). This will tell you if lung exchange is the rate limiting factor. If you don't perform better while breathing pure O2, then the rate limiting factor is probably your blood O2 carrying capacity levels - and they are likely saturated when breathing natural atmospheric air (21% oxygen). In fact, I think the rate limiting factor might actually be your ability to discharge CO2 and doesn't even have much to do with O2. I think rate of breathing is controlled by C02 levels (blood acidity), not O2. This 100% O2 experiment would have to be a fairly controlled experiment (VO2 max test) though with power meter readings, O2 tube in mouth, nostrils taped shut...and done at maximal effort. It can be done for like $250-$350 by someone like Josh Gold: http://pushhard.com/physiology.html If you don't perform much better with pure O2 (100% O2) than you do with atmospheric air (21% O2), then it's your blood (or other things) that is the rate-limiting factor and not your mechanical pulmonary exchange. Magilla |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How fast is too fast (to breathe)?
In article ,
MagillaGorilla wrote: You should get on a stationary bike and only breathe pure O2 (usually available for free from your local rescue squad if you have your own O2 tank). This will tell you if lung exchange is the rate limiting factor. Anybody out there taking this seriously, DON'T breath pure O2, or even breath air fortified with O2. You will kill yourself. -- Michael Press |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How fast is too fast (to breathe)?
Michael Press wrote: In article , MagillaGorilla wrote: You should get on a stationary bike and only breathe pure O2 (usually available for free from your local rescue squad if you have your own O2 tank). This will tell you if lung exchange is the rate limiting factor. Anybody out there taking this seriously, DON'T breath pure O2, or even breath air fortified with O2. You will kill yourself. dumbass, i did actually breathe pure oxygen (as part of a NASA study), but it was at low pressure. a quick google produced this : http://science.howstuffworks.com/question493.htm "... astronauts in the Gemini and Apollo programs breathed 100-percent oxygen at reduced pressure for up to two weeks with no problems. In contrast, when 100-percent oxygen is breathed under high pressure (above 3000 torr), acute oxygen poisoning can occur ..." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How fast is too fast (to breathe)?
In article
.com , " wrote: Michael Press wrote: In article , MagillaGorilla wrote: You should get on a stationary bike and only breathe pure O2 (usually available for free from your local rescue squad if you have your own O2 tank). This will tell you if lung exchange is the rate limiting factor. Anybody out there taking this seriously, DON'T breath pure O2, or even breath air fortified with O2. You will kill yourself. dumbass, i did actually breathe pure oxygen (as part of a NASA study), but it was at low pressure. a quick google produced this : http://science.howstuffworks.com/question493.htm "... astronauts in the Gemini and Apollo programs breathed 100-percent oxygen at reduced pressure for up to two weeks with no problems. In contrast, when 100-percent oxygen is breathed under high pressure (above 3000 torr), acute oxygen poisoning can occur ..." Did not say it could not be done under elaborately controlled conditions, with close medical monitoring, and in full possession of all relevant knowledge. -- Michael Press |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How fast have you been... | Mark Thompson | UK | 42 | November 13th 06 02:50 PM |
Fast guy pic | Phil, Squid-in-Training | Techniques | 10 | June 2nd 06 03:05 PM |
How fast are they going? | Hell and High Water | Racing | 7 | March 21st 06 07:17 PM |
Not Going Fast Now! | ohboy | Racing | 0 | December 28th 05 04:54 PM |
How Fast can you Go? | Mark Thompson | UK | 269 | August 11th 04 06:28 AM |