Pedestrian takes the law into his own hands

Oi, cyclist! Stay off the pavements!

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/sur...-west-16856097

On 03/09/2019 15:32, MrCheerful wrote:

Oi, cyclist!Â* Stay off the pavements!

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/sur...-west-16856097

The police are looking for the victim, presumably as a witness to the
offence. But the offender has admitted cycling along the footway so can
hardly plead NG to it in court.

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 3:32:10 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
Oi, cyclist! Stay off the pavements!

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/sur...-west-16856097

Where is the evidence the victim was on the pavement and how is attempted murder justified?

On 03/09/2019 16:27, Simon Jester wrote:

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 3:32:10 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:

Oi, cyclist! Stay off the pavements!

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/sur...-west-16856097

Where is the evidence the victim was on the pavement and how is attempted murder justified?

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the "pavement"
(properly known as the "footway" for good and rather obvious reasons)
and that the offender was also on the footway, on a bicycle.

Read it again - a few times,if necessary. Eventually, even you' will
understand it despite the use of some words of more than one syllable.
Just keep at it.

On 04/09/2019 12:06, JNugent wrote:

On 03/09/2019 16:27, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 3:32:10 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:

Oi, cyclist!Â* Stay off the pavements!

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/sur...-west-16856097


Where is the evidence the victim was on the pavement and how is
attempted murder justified?

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the "pavement"
(properly known as the "footway" for good and rather obvious reasons)
and that the offender was also on the footway, on a bicycle.

Read it again - a few times,if necessary. Eventually, even you' will
understand it despite the use of some words of more than one syllable.
Just keep at it.

Let me just re-type that on a better keyboard:

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the "pavement"
(properly known as the "footway" for good and rather obvious reasons)
and that the offender was also on the footway, on a bicycle.

Read it again - a few times, if necessary. Eventually, even you will
understand it despite the use of some words of more than one syllable.
Just keep at it.

On 04/09/2019 12:37, JNugent wrote:

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the "pavement"
(properly known as the "footway" for good and rather obvious reasons)
and that the offender was also on the footway, on a bicycle.

What did the "offender" do to the "victim"?

On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 12:06:28 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/09/2019 12:37, JNugent wrote:

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the "pavement"
(properly known as the "footway" for good and rather obvious reasons)
and that the offender was also on the footway, on a bicycle.

What did the "offender" do to the "victim"?

He pushed her into the road. The report clearly states the victim was cycling along the road.

On 05/09/2019 07:47, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 12:06:28 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/09/2019 12:37, JNugent wrote:

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the
"pavement" (properly known as the "footway" for good and rather
obvious reasons) and that the offender was also on the footway,
on a bicycle.

What did the "offender" do to the "victim"?

He pushed her into the road. The report clearly states the victim was
cycling along the road.

Indeed, that is the way it was reported. I was enquiring about what
happened in Nugent's alternative universe.

On 05/09/2019 00:06, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/09/2019 12:37, JNugent wrote:

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the
"pavement" (properly known as the "footway" for good and rather
obvious reasons) and that the offender was also on the footway, on a
bicycle.

What did the "offender" do to the "victim"?

The victim was threatened by the offender's dangerous behaviour, of course.

There's a reason why cycling along footways is not allowed. Have a think
and see whether you can guess what it is.

But in any event, any citizen is entitled to point out that an
offender's illegal behaviour is... er... illegal, and to remonstrate
with the offender. Not that offending cyclists are susceptible to any
sense of shame or social responsibility, of course.

On 05/09/2019 07:47, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 12:06:28 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/09/2019 12:37, JNugent wrote:

The report clearly states that the victim was on foot on the "pavement"
(properly known as the "footway" for good and rather obvious reasons)
and that the offender was also on the footway, on a bicycle.

What did the "offender" do to the "victim"?

He pushed her into the road. The report clearly states the victim was cycling along the road.

QUOTE:
....she was approached ... and pushed into the road
ENDQUOTE

How can anyone be pushed from the road into the road? She was cycling
along the footway - illegally.