Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway

On 12/07/2019 03:15, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 2:15:22 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 18:31, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:43:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote:

You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways.

You don't even understand what you are saying.

It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours.

Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz.

The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester
tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in
"pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian
zones are on motorways.

Where did I try to justify their actions?

In a post on this newsgroup.

Then you should have no trouble citing the actual text.

That's true. And neither would you, if you seriously disputed what was
said. But you don't, because you know it's true.

If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence
committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate
Jester's mind.

Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'.

You've already agreed that.

Without a definition I cannot agree or disagree.

That didn't stop you.


A claim you have made yet refuse to provide any evidence to support it.

Not necessary. You've already agreed it.

Where?



That's all.

Folks!