|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 11/07/2019 18:32, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:40:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 16:29, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 2:37:03 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:31, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 1:05:18 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: Audrey has been left with a number of injures, including minor fractures around her left eye socket, a fractured left cheek, a cut on her forehead, concussion and a bleed to the brain. Sue says all her siblings are shocked and they can't understand why anyone would ride off. "The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross. I can't understand why anyone would do this and then ride off." https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...olice-16562465 A helmet would help. Why did the Police at the scene not detain the cyclist? here's what you need: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Practice-Makes-Perfect-English-Second/dp/0071849629/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Basic+english&qid=1562852203&s =gateway&sr=8-1 I am not clicking on that link. You didn't need to. Even with English being something you struggle with, the title of the book ("Basic English") was clear enough within the URL. Zzzzzzzzzzzzz. No: "Basic English". You've got it even worse than it seemed. "The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross." If the Police were not on scene how do they know this? Have you asked them? Have you? Why would I? I'm not the one who thinks the police are lying about the malicious actions of the cyclist. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 2:13:53 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 18:32, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:40:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 16:29, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 2:37:03 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:31, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 1:05:18 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: Audrey has been left with a number of injures, including minor fractures around her left eye socket, a fractured left cheek, a cut on her forehead, concussion and a bleed to the brain. Sue says all her siblings are shocked and they can't understand why anyone would ride off. "The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross. I can't understand why anyone would do this and then ride off." https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...olice-16562465 A helmet would help. Why did the Police at the scene not detain the cyclist? here's what you need: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Practice-Makes-Perfect-English-Second/dp/0071849629/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Basic+english&qid=1562852203&s =gateway&sr=8-1 I am not clicking on that link. You didn't need to. Even with English being something you struggle with, the title of the book ("Basic English") was clear enough within the URL. Zzzzzzzzzzzzz. No: "Basic English". You've got it even worse than it seemed. "The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross." If the Police were not on scene how do they know this? Have you asked them? Have you? Why would I? I'm not the one who thinks the police are lying about the malicious actions of the cyclist. Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 2:13:53 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 18:32, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:40:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 16:29, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 2:37:03 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:31, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 1:05:18 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: Audrey has been left with a number of injures, including minor fractures around her left eye socket, a fractured left cheek, a cut on her forehead, concussion and a bleed to the brain. Sue says all her siblings are shocked and they can't understand why anyone would ride off. "The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross. I can't understand why anyone would do this and then ride off." https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...olice-16562465 A helmet would help. Why did the Police at the scene not detain the cyclist? here's what you need: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Practice-Makes-Perfect-English-Second/dp/0071849629/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Basic+english&qid=1562852203&s =gateway&sr=8-1 I am not clicking on that link. You didn't need to. Even with English being something you struggle with, the title of the book ("Basic English") was clear enough within the URL. Zzzzzzzzzzzzz. No: "Basic English". You've got it even worse than it seemed. "The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross." If the Police were not on scene how do they know this? Have you asked them? Have you? Why would I? I'm not the one who thinks the police are lying about the malicious actions of the cyclist. Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 11/07/2019 16:29, Simon Jester wrote:
"The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross." If the Police were not on scene how do they know this? The policeman was one of Noddy's cousins. If a cyclist is involved the cyclist is always wrong. The pedestrian light must have been green. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why -- Bod |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? shrug Ealing? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 16:53, Bod wrote:
On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why *If* that is what it means in chav-speak, it was a particularly mystifying response to the sentence "I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience". Still... look who "wrote" it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 foot tall scumbag cyclist hospitalises OAP | MrCheerful | UK | 24 | April 5th 19 02:18 PM |
Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 38 | January 29th 16 07:51 AM |
Hull cyclist mows down OAP and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 4 | October 22nd 14 09:33 AM |
Cyclist hospitalises 70 y/o waiting for a bus | Mrcheerful | UK | 1 | September 29th 14 08:02 PM |
Cyclist causes a crash and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 11 | November 7th 13 09:50 PM |