|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Brian G wrote: I've been a regular if hardly prolific contributor to this newsgroup for a number of years. In recent times I've posted very rarely, mainly because the traffic has all but been taken over by a few pathetic but persistent rolls. My killfile now seems to have more entries than Yellow Pages, yet still this morning when I logged on I was faced with a mess of posts from dumbclucks using ever sillier names to head up their drivel. If only a few no doubt well-meaning trollwarriors had simply left them alone to get bored and lonely when they first began to erupt like pus from their suppurating sores, the group might have been able to continue its useful life. Ho hum. Well, you'd have thought so, but judith has been almost completely ignored for a period of weeks now and still posts here regardless. Of course, had we plonked her rather than tried to answer her questions in the very begininng this might not be the case, but her original questions did not appear to be trolling - it's only afterwards that one discovers her long-standing (and self-admitted) MO of starting out reasonable and then deliberately adopting a contrarian position in order to provoke and indefinitely prolong an argument. This kind of problem is hard to fix without killfiling all newbies. Guy - -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound GPG sig #3FA3BCDE http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public-key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI+gCaHBDrsD+jvN4RAlfQAJ9Mryk5iYwoeLajEvBF9u EGUuTBYwCfUMqr zpyiCSOn/9/utsXD2zamTE8= =rRLR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:30:47 +0100,
Phil W Lee phil wrote: "Just zis Guy, you know?" considered Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:51:19 +0100 the perfect time to write: *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION *** *** Status: Bad Signature *** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered. *** Signer: Guy Chapman (0x3FA3BCDE) *** Signed: 18/10/2008 16:28:26 *** Verified: 19/10/2008 20:30:01 *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Easy to see the forgeries now. I'd have expected that forging a signature with intent to deceive would be an offence. However, I'm not sure under what legislation it would fall. Electronic Communications Act 2000 (c. 7) made electronic signatures legally recognised but doesn't appear to make any changes to the criminal code. Some countries, when they implemented the European directives on electronic signatures, made explicit changes to the criminal code to make forging electronic signatures an offence. Maybe the UK didn't need to, or maybe the EU directive didn't require it, or maybe there's some other legislation that I'm not aware of. Tim. -- God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light. http://www.woodall.me.uk/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
On 2008-10-19, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:30:47 +0100, Phil W Lee phil wrote: "Just zis Guy, you know?" considered Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:51:19 +0100 the perfect time to write: *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION *** *** Status: Bad Signature *** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered. *** Signer: Guy Chapman (0x3FA3BCDE) *** Signed: 18/10/2008 16:28:26 *** Verified: 19/10/2008 20:30:01 *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Easy to see the forgeries now. I'd have expected that forging a signature with intent to deceive would be an offence. However, I'm not sure under what legislation it would fall. Electronic Communications Act 2000 (c. 7) made electronic signatures legally recognised but doesn't appear to make any changes to the criminal code. Some countries, when they implemented the European directives on electronic signatures, made explicit changes to the criminal code to make forging electronic signatures an offence. Maybe the UK didn't need to, or maybe the EU directive didn't require it, or maybe there's some other legislation that I'm not aware of. If so it would only be one of those silly laws you can easily get away with breaking-- like speed limits or stopping at red lights on a bicycle. [ducks] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
"Tim Woodall" wrote in message e.uk... On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:30:47 +0100, Phil W Lee phil wrote: "Just zis Guy, you know?" considered Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:51:19 +0100 the perfect time to write: *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION *** *** Status: Bad Signature *** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered. *** Signer: Guy Chapman (0x3FA3BCDE) *** Signed: 18/10/2008 16:28:26 *** Verified: 19/10/2008 20:30:01 *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Easy to see the forgeries now. I'd have expected that forging a signature with intent to deceive would be an offence. However, I'm not sure under what legislation it would fall. Giganews AUP mentions a $50 per message charge to identify and remove messages sent with altered headers (which includes "to attribute a post to someone else"). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
"Tim Woodall" wrote
I'd have expected that forging a signature with intent to deceive would be an offence. However, I'm not sure under what legislation it would fall. The agreement made when signing on with news.individual // User of News.Individual.NET are obliged to abide by the following set of rules. Disregarding the rules may cause termination of access privileges without further notice. Amounts paid will not be refunded, neither partly nor in full. a.. Sender Address The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" should be valid (= should not bounce because of invalidity). Using addresses and name space of other people without their permission is prohibited. (For more details and ways to protect yourself from SPAM see section 5.3 of our FAQ.) ..// // a.. Violation of a newsgroup's charter Please inform the author about the usual conventions via e-mail first - especially if there are particular features in addition or contrary to the usual rules in de.*. If this does not work, simply add that author to the kill file / the filter of your news reader. a.. Problems with the content of postings Please clarify your differences with the author directly or use the kill file / filter of your news reader. In serious cases you can consider legal procedures, of course. a.. Substantial abuse (SPAM, rogue cancel) Please turn to in such cases, attaching at least one complete article header if possible. // Has he been given sufficient notice by now? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:30:47 +0100, Phil W Lee
phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk wrote: "Just zis Guy, you know?" considered Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:51:19 +0100 the perfect time to write: *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION *** *** Status: Bad Signature *** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered. *** Signer: Guy Chapman (0x3FA3BCDE) *** Signed: 18/10/2008 16:28:26 *** Verified: 19/10/2008 20:30:01 *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** Easy to see the forgeries now. You are as daft as Chapman. Keep up the good work. -- I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman) Some evidence shows that helmeted cyclists are more likely to hit their heads. (Guy Chapman) I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman) - proven to be an outright lie. He then quickly changed his web page - but "forgot" to change the date of last amendment |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I Still Hate Motorists, Even Though I've Just Changed My Site To Attempt To Cover It Up
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:14:37 +0100, "DavidR"
wrote: "Tim Woodall" wrote I'd have expected that forging a signature with intent to deceive would be an offence. However, I'm not sure under what legislation it would fall. The agreement made when signing on with news.individual // User of News.Individual.NET are obliged to abide by the following set of rules. Disregarding the rules may cause termination of access privileges without further notice. Amounts paid will not be refunded, neither partly nor in full. a.. Sender Address The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" should be valid (= should not bounce because of invalidity). Using addresses and name space of other people without their permission is prohibited. (For more details and ways to protect yourself from SPAM see section 5.3 of our Spot on - that's what Chapman got a slapping for. He used to forge the address . -- I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman) Some evidence shows that helmeted cyclists are more likely to hit their heads. (Guy Chapman) I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman) - proven to be an outright lie. He then quickly changed his web page - but "forgot" to change the date of last amendment |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapman's OWN Web Page: "I Hate Motorists" | Chapman Is A Liar | UK | 15 | October 22nd 08 04:29 AM |
I Hate Motorists | _[_4_] | UK | 4 | October 10th 08 06:57 PM |
Motorists will even hate us more now | Peter Wilson | Australia | 8 | August 5th 05 03:17 AM |