|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Slacker wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:51:48 -0500, Ride-A-Lot wrote: Raptor wrote: Ride-A-Lot wrote: Raptor wrote: I heard on NPR tonight that annually, 150,000 children die in Indonesia before the age of five from everyday causes like diarrhea, tetanus, malnutrition, etc. Oh wait a second... NPR. That says it all. Actually it doesn't. What does it say to you? (It was a journalist who said it, one who worked that part of the world routinely, being interviewed about the disaster.) NPR = National Polit(bureau) Radio NPR is rad http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4274791 I guess thay have to be played somewhere, since AOR isn't going to do it. It fits the NPR mentality perfectly... No harm radio. Tell it like it is as long as it's sweet, innocent, war and violence free. Ugh, I think I'm going to go and vomit now. -- o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o www.schnauzers.ws |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Ride-A-Lot says...
It's very sad, but I think this is a great opportunity for the USA and especially the citizens of this country to show how compasionate we can be. Many of the countries that were hit are Muslim countries. A show of support from the US will surely go a long way to showing them that we are not against them as the terrorists would have them think. You expect gratitude? Don't bet on it. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:06:01 -0500, Fred Barney
wrote: Ride-A-Lot says... It's very sad, but I think this is a great opportunity for the USA and especially the citizens of this country to show how compasionate we can be. Many of the countries that were hit are Muslim countries. A show of support from the US will surely go a long way to showing them that we are not against them as the terrorists would have them think. You expect gratitude? Don't bet on it. An Egyptian paper is reporting that the tsunami was caused by Indian underwater nuclear testing. Of course with the aid of the US and Israel. That's why we were so quick to offer aid to those Islamic nations. We'll help, but know we do it for ourselves, because of what we believe and know of ourselves. As for gratitude, **** it. If I want gratitude I'll get a puppy. Ron |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... J G wrote: It's very sad, but I think this is a great opportunity for the USA and especially the citizens of this country to show how compasionate we can be. Many of the countries that were hit are Muslim countries. A show of support from the US will surely go a long way to showing them that we are not against them as the terrorists would have them think. It's typical for us to think that money can show other nations that we truly care. This is exactly the capitalist mindset. If money is the most important thing, then surely giving it away will gain us resounding support in the remainder of the world. Um .... wrong answer. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
cc wrote:
It's typical for us to think that money can show other nations that we truly care. This is exactly the capitalist mindset. If money is the most important thing, then surely giving it away will gain us resounding support in the remainder of the world. Um .... wrong answer. Oh, horse****. Just the pure logistics of the campaign led by the U.S. is astounding, over and beyond the huge monetary outlay. It isn't done to gain favor. By your logic we should just say "tough ****" -- those Osama-t-shirt-wearing refugees will hate us anyway. Anyone who doesn't appreciate our efforts can kiss our ass. (And we'll STILL save theirs.) -- BS (no, really) |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message ... cc wrote: It's typical for us to think that money can show other nations that we truly care. This is exactly the capitalist mindset. If money is the most important thing, then surely giving it away will gain us resounding support in the remainder of the world. Um .... wrong answer. Oh, horse****. Just the pure logistics of the campaign led by the U.S. is astounding, over and beyond the huge monetary outlay. It isn't done to gain favor. Well, I think that depends on who you ask. I can guarantee you that the sentiment I was responding to is shared by more than a few folks on the hill. I'm not saying it's not the right thing to do, or that there are not many with their heads in the right places, but our foreign policy has shown that the US is not run by altruists. It's not a black and white issue. By your logic we should just say "tough ****" -- those Osama-t-shirt-wearing refugees will hate us anyway. That is far from what I am saying. If you would have thought a little longer before you hunt and pecked this knee-jerk response, you would realize that it is not the action that I'm objecting to, but our perspective on humanitarian issues, i.e. "we gave you money, you have to like us now." It just doesn't work that way. Anyone who doesn't appreciate our efforts can kiss our ass. (And we'll STILL save theirs.) Bill, this ridiculous remark only proves my point. Perhaps if we could take a minute to try and understand other cultures before we decide what is right for them, we might find ourselves out of our "asshole" role in world politics. -- BS (no, really) Clearly |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:58:18 -0800, cc wrote:
Perhaps if we could take a minute to try and understand other cultures before we decide what is right for them, we might find ourselves out of our "asshole" role in world politics. Huh, and here we are thinking they need shelter, water,and medicine. Silly us. -- -BB- |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
On 9 Jan 2005 06:17:17 GMT, BB wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:58:18 -0800, cc wrote: Perhaps if we could take a minute to try and understand other cultures before we decide what i= s = right for them, we might find ourselves out of our "asshole" role in world politics. Huh, and here we are thinking they need shelter, water,and medicine. = Silly us. What the hell are you thinking!?!?! What they really need is some well positioned claymore mines, anthrax = laced fruit & veggies and a couple hundred thousand Wigi boards. -- = Slacker |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
cc wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message ... cc wrote: It's typical for us to think that money can show other nations that we truly care. This is exactly the capitalist mindset. If money is the most important thing, then surely giving it away will gain us resounding support in the remainder of the world. Um .... wrong answer. Oh, horse****. Just the pure logistics of the campaign led by the U.S. is astounding, over and beyond the huge monetary outlay. It isn't done to gain favor. Well, I think that depends on who you ask. I can guarantee you that the sentiment I was responding to is shared by more than a few folks on the hill. I'm not saying it's not the right thing to do, or that there are not many with their heads in the right places, but our foreign policy has shown that the US is not run by altruists. It's not a black and white issue. Then why did you write what you did? Sure sounds black and white. By your logic we should just say "tough ****" -- those Osama-t-shirt-wearing refugees will hate us anyway. That is far from what I am saying. If you would have thought a little longer before you hunt and pecked this knee-jerk response, you would realize that it is not the action that I'm objecting to, but our perspective on humanitarian issues, i.e. "we gave you money, you have to like us now." It just doesn't work that way. There you go again. It's NOT black and white, despite your opinion. Anyone who doesn't appreciate our efforts can kiss our ass. (And we'll STILL save theirs.) Bill, this ridiculous remark only proves my point. Perhaps if we could take a minute to try and understand other cultures before we decide what is right for them, we might find ourselves out of our "asshole" role in world politics. So saving their lives and donating the materials to rebuild is "deciding what's right for them"? We literally can't win with your "Blame America First" crowd. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
BB wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:58:18 -0800, cc wrote: Perhaps if we could take a minute to try and understand other cultures before we decide what is right for them, we might find ourselves out of our "asshole" role in world politics. Huh, and here we are thinking they need shelter, water,and medicine. Silly us. Bingo. Bill "BB beats cc in a landslide" S. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Tsunami Cyclocross frame with Carbon 'cross fork | Darrell Goodwin | Marketplace | 4 | June 17th 04 06:29 PM |
FS: Tsunami Cyclocross frame with Carbon 'cross fork | Darrell Goodwin | Marketplace | 0 | June 3rd 04 01:02 AM |