|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
cc wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message ... cc wrote: "Bill Sornson" wrote in message ... cc wrote: So saving their lives and donating the materials to rebuild is "deciding what's right for them"? This thread is about tsunami aid. Your attitude is much larger in scope. I was responding to the latter. People can re-read the thread to see whose "attitude" a) came first; b) was "black & white" (your term), and c) is flat-out wrong-minded (using any excuse to blame "capitalism" when the thread WAS about providing humanitarian aid...period). Go ahead and get in your precious last word; I'm done. -- "Sorry the world just does not work by your white penis ass." -- Pungent Cloud |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
What does over 200,000 dead and more to come have to do
with riding my bike. MTB 05 |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Goodoz wrote:
"cc" wrote in message ... thing, then surely giving it away will gain us resounding support in the remainder of the world. Um .... wrong answer. That's a bunch of hoo-haaaaaa!!!! Only hours into that situation, "the world community" was crying out for US money (and, it was/is needed and appropriate). Claims were even made that we were slow to act and didn't pledge enough support. Despite our (once again) enormous contributions, make no mistake in understanding that ANY action taken ANY time by America IS money -- be it cash, supplies, manpower, support etc. So, I guess you're stuck there -- unless you're talking about acclimation for Americans toward the ways of the rest of the world (where else is a better place to live? Go there, be well and be happy!) Also, humanitarian aid and capitalism don't correlate (they are two completely different things). Considering the large tsunami dollars pledged by America, don't lose sight of the fact that our American government is not a capitalist entity. The government "generates" nothing...it simply "collects" dollars, in the form of taxes (which is not capitalism). All pledges here were made by our democraticly elected officials, on behalf of the American people (and, most of them ARE capitalists). "Reputation" in the eyes of the world is a heavy factor for America. It is not, however, something that weighs heavier than our way of living and governing ourselves. If it were, why then do so many others from around the world leave their home nations and come to live here. If you're feeling poorly about your reputation in the rest of the world's view, you're free to leave (unfortunately, if you live in another country, you may not be so free to come back!!) Goodoz Wow! Want to run for office? I'll vote for you. -- o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o www.schnauzers.ws |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
"Goodoz" wrote in message ... "cc" wrote in message ... "Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... J G wrote: Only hours into that situation, "the world community" was crying out for US money (and, it was/is needed and appropriate). Claims were even made that we were slow to act and didn't pledge enough support. Despite our (once again) enormous contributions, make no mistake in understanding that ANY action taken ANY time by America IS money -- be it cash, supplies, manpower, support etc. No, this is incorrect. Our policy decisions, e.g. sanctions, efforts for social reform, and support for other, less obvious (at least so far as the media is concerned) humanitarian and civil rights issues all show that we can take action without expenditures. So, I guess you're stuck there -- unless you're talking about acclimation for Americans toward the ways of the rest of the world (where else is a better place to live? Go there, be well and be happy!) Again, it's not (for me, anyway) about whose country is better, but an understanding that there are peoples in the world who are different than we. This is a fundamental deficiency in our collective state of mind. And you're right: why should we? We're comfortable, we're "the best", and we have the money. The rest of the world? **** 'em, right? What could they possibly have to offer? Also, humanitarian aid and capitalism don't correlate (they are two completely different things). Considering the large tsunami dollars pledged by America, don't lose sight of the fact that our American government is not a capitalist entity. The government "generates" nothing...it simply "collects" dollars, in the form of taxes (which is not capitalism). All pledges here were made by our democraticly elected officials, on behalf of the American people (and, most of them ARE capitalists). I'm not sure where you live, but it must be in a textbook that describes how a democracy *should* work. The state and corporate sector are essentially walking hand and hand, trampling the rights of common citizens, not to mention the rest of the world. Wake up. Capitalism is the economy. Corporations run the economy and domestic policy (what's good for business is what's good for America). Saying they are two separate entities is charmingly naive, but inaccurate. That's like saying we've achieved the separation of church and state . . oh wait, except much worse. "Reputation" in the eyes of the world is a heavy factor for America. It is not, however, something that weighs heavier than our way of living and governing ourselves. This is a no-brainer. The present state of world, e.g. the AIDS epidemic in Africa, slave labor in various third-world countries, atrocious health conditions and starvation leading to unprecedented child death rates (as previously mentioned in this thread), wholesale prostitution trades built around tourist traffic, (this list goes on), compared with our daily lives (where one of us might complain because we can't ride because it's wet, or because Mike V.'s a tool), makes it all too apparent. If it were, why then do so many others from around the world leave their home nations and come to live here. Because this country is rich, and the standard of living is high. If you could make 10x what you made in your home country, be protected by a union, and not be treated like a slave, I think that their foreign policy might take a back seat as a deciding factor. If you're feeling poorly about your reputation in the rest of the world's view, you're free to leave (unfortunately, if you live in another country, you may not be so free to come back!!) Thanks for the advice. Next time I want some from someone I don't know, I'll be in touch. cc |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
"cc" wrote in message ... "Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... J G wrote: It's very sad, but I think this is a great opportunity for the USA and especially the citizens of this country to show how compasionate we can be. Many of the countries that were hit are Muslim countries. A show of support from the US will surely go a long way to showing them that we are not against them as the terrorists would have them think. It's typical for us to think that money can show other nations that we truly care. This is exactly the capitalist mindset. If money is the most important thing, then surely giving it away will gain us resounding support in the remainder of the world. Um .... wrong answer. That's a bunch of hoo-haaaaaa!!!! Only hours into that situation, "the world community" was crying out for US money (and, it was/is needed and appropriate). Claims were even made that we were slow to act and didn't pledge enough support. Despite our (once again) enormous contributions, make no mistake in understanding that ANY action taken ANY time by America IS money -- be it cash, supplies, manpower, support etc. So, I guess you're stuck there -- unless you're talking about acclimation for Americans toward the ways of the rest of the world (where else is a better place to live? Go there, be well and be happy!) Also, humanitarian aid and capitalism don't correlate (they are two completely different things). Considering the large tsunami dollars pledged by America, don't lose sight of the fact that our American government is not a capitalist entity. The government "generates" nothing...it simply "collects" dollars, in the form of taxes (which is not capitalism). All pledges here were made by our democraticly elected officials, on behalf of the American people (and, most of them ARE capitalists). "Reputation" in the eyes of the world is a heavy factor for America. It is not, however, something that weighs heavier than our way of living and governing ourselves. If it were, why then do so many others from around the world leave their home nations and come to live here. If you're feeling poorly about your reputation in the rest of the world's view, you're free to leave (unfortunately, if you live in another country, you may not be so free to come back!!) Goodoz |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... What does over 200,000 dead and more to come have to do with riding my bike. MTB 05 For starter, they probably MADE your bike, you asshole. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... No one remembers the earthquake in LA around 84 or 85. I was asleep 160 miles to the north and it got me out of bed. I didn't wine like a baby. **** happens you got to take like a man. Oh yeah - "the" earthquake of maybe 1984 or 1985. You are a ****ing IDIOT. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
"Goodoz" wrote in message ... "cc" wrote in message ... "Goodoz" wrote in message ... "cc" wrote in message ... "Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... J G wrote: It's ignorant to imply that America has no understanding that there are people in the world that are different from us. Perhaps. But - for example - there was a severe lack of commentary on *why* 9/11 happened, i.e. why other countries despise us. I don't think in general there is really room to talk about the US every being wrong. I know we can't go back and be like "hey, sorry we totally disrespected your religion, culture and stuff," but i think our actions in many cases have simply been bull****. There is no collective. We're all free and wild.....[you wake up!] You knew I was referring to public opinion, which, by the way, is not very diverse. And you're right: why should we? We're comfortable, we're "the best", and we have the money. The rest of the world? **** 'em, right? What could they possibly have to offer? That's completely stupid! America is all over the world because it has lot's to offer. And, the rest of the world is all over America (been on the web lately?) A very small portion of our population is "all over the world." I'm sure the vast majority of Americans never leave the country, not to mention if you leave out Mexico and Canada. We do have a lot to offer, in particular in science and industry, but I don't believe in general that it is these populations that have problems realizing that other cultures (and history) are invaluable for understanding and helping to shape our future. Scientists didn't coin the phrase "freedom fries." I'm not sure where you live, but it must be in a textbook that describes how a democracy *should* work. I didn't bring up "Democracy"-"democraticly elected officials..." look up^ I understand that, but the separation of commerce and government is an idealization of this nature. I also believe that the alliances I alluded to earlier compromise our system. I wouldn't strictly call it a democracy. The state and corporate sector are essentially walking hand and hand, trampling the rights of common citizens, not to mention the rest of the world. Wake up What??? I think you dropped YOUR textbook. You obviously aren't paying attention. Try reading. I recommend a little Noam Chomsky and Amy Goodman. Try watching news that isn't owned by a transnational corporation. Oh wait ! You can't do that except on cable access ! What was I thinking? If you get your news from TV, I can't blame you for thinking the way you do. Capitalism is the economy. Thank Goodness....... Well, if you really want to call it that. Pure capitalism cannot exist indefinitely - Marx was right - and we are a perfect example of that. Despite our early lessons with antitrust issues, we have again let a continued narrowing of industry control compromise the "best interests of the citizens" supposedly provided by the competition in the capitalist marketplace. Now that is what I call hoo-haa. Yep -- they have much to do with it. And, it's all Federally Regulated...what's your bright idea? Remove the money from politics with Xtreme campaign finance reform and improved tracking of political donations, soft money in particular. Enforce open bidding for government contracts. Remove the state from media and encourage independent journalism, e.g. www.democracynow.org (what's good for business is what's good for America) Correct. No no no, I was pointing out this Coolidge quote as a joke. It is this trump that allows businesses to walk over human rights as secondary to the economic well-being of our country. Let's not bring religion into this... I'm not. I'm just saying that it's another idealistic notion, similar to the idea that we exercise control over this country. I'm sorry, that was weak..(what else can we do that we don't already-what are your ideas?) (but yes, Mike V's......) Well, most follow from what I've listed above. We need to take ownership of this country. We don't show that we act out of the principle of the overall good of mankind. I know that sounds ridiculous, but our actions are transparently self-serving. This is why the world is tired of us. We're bullies. Examples? Environmental regulations: The refusal to set this standard just shows a total lack of responsibility, which as THE world superpower, we should demonstrate. Not to mention our unbelievable consumption of oil per capita compared to the rest of the world. It is the government's responsibility to recognize the need for energy reform, and to encourage it despite the push from auto, oil, and chemical lobbyists to thwart these efforts. Exploitation of laborers in third-world countries: It is our task to take a stand against this practice, which we have pioneered. Bilking of poor countries for aid by pharamaceutical companies: This is so low, and a perfect example of where humanity has been sacrificed for profit. Let's see -- how about we extort those who can least afford it for medication that they need to, um, live. The systematic manipulation and misuse of scientific information to structure public policy: This has mostly to do with the current administration, thank god. It's not as systematic as other problems, but is still a poor example. I could go on, but I'm sure you're uninterested in my opinions. But your question was "what can we do that we aren't already?" On a political level, the above need to be pursued. On a personal level, we can make a difference. Don't buy an SUV. Use renewable fuels, and make demand for them known. Boycott corporations that exploit workers. Outside of these, we can get involved in government. We need to stop being comfortable turning the other cheek to what goes on to those that are less fortunate, and look out for everyone, not just the fortunate. The Monroe Doctrine was bull****. Because this country is rich, and the standard of living is high. If you could make 10x what you made in your home country, be protected by a union, and not be treated like a slave, I think that their foreign policy might take a back seat as a deciding factor. Wow -- that's deep. OK,.....close the Manifesto, and get some rest (really)... Well, i'm sorry, but that is reality in many cases. I recognize that we also offer liberties that are not available in other countries, but I guarantee standard of living is generally first consideration. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! Want to run for office? I'll vote for you. -- o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o www.schnauzers.ws Nope! I just want to live, care for, and enjoy, my family and laugh a lot....until it's time to move on... Goodoz ;-) |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
"cc" wrote in message ... "Goodoz" wrote in message ... "cc" wrote in message ... "Ride-A-Lot" wrote in message ... J G wrote: Only hours into that situation, "the world community" was crying out for US money (and, it was/is needed and appropriate). Claims were even made that we were slow to act and didn't pledge enough support. Despite our (once again) enormous contributions, make no mistake in understanding that ANY action taken ANY time by America IS money -- be it cash, supplies, manpower, support etc. No, this is incorrect. Our policy decisions, e.g. sanctions, efforts for social reform, and support for other, less obvious (at least so far as the media is concerned) humanitarian and civil rights issues all show that we can take action without expenditures. I suppose we could offer well wishes.....instead.... So, I guess you're stuck there -- unless you're talking about acclimation for Americans toward the ways of the rest of the world (where else is a better place to live? Go there, be well and be happy!) Again, it's not (for me, anyway) about whose country is better, but an understanding that there are peoples in the world who are different than we. It's ignorant to imply that America has no understanding that there are people in the world that are different from us. This is a fundamental deficiency in our collective state of mind. There is no collective. We're all free and wild.....[you wake up!] And you're right: why should we? We're comfortable, we're "the best", and we have the money. The rest of the world? **** 'em, right? What could they possibly have to offer? That's completely stupid! America is all over the world because it has lot's to offer. And, the rest of the world is all over America (been on the web lately?) Also, humanitarian aid and capitalism don't correlate (they are two completely different things). Considering the large tsunami dollars pledged by America, don't lose sight of the fact that our American government is not a capitalist entity. The government "generates" nothing...it simply "collects" dollars, in the form of taxes (which is not capitalism). All pledges here were made by our democraticly elected officials, on behalf of the American people (and, most of them ARE capitalists). I'm not sure where you live, but it must be in a textbook that describes how a democracy *should* work. I didn't bring up "Democracy"-"democraticly elected officials..." look up^ The state and corporate sector are essentially walking hand and hand, trampling the rights of common citizens, not to mention the rest of the world. Wake up What??? I think you dropped YOUR textbook. .. Capitalism is the economy. Thank Goodness....... Corporations run the economy and domestic policy Yep -- they have much to do with it. And, it's all Federally Regulated...what's your bright idea? (what's good for business is what's good for America) Correct. .. Saying they are two separate entities is charmingly naive, but inaccurate. That's like saying we've achieved the separation of church and state . . oh wait, except much worse. Let's not bring religion into this... "Reputation" in the eyes of the world is a heavy factor for America. It is not, however, something that weighs heavier than our way of living and governing ourselves. This is a no-brainer. The present state of world, e.g. the AIDS epidemic in Africa, slave labor in various third-world countries, atrocious health conditions and starvation leading to unprecedented child death rates (as previously mentioned in this thread), wholesale prostitution trades built around tourist traffic, (this list goes on), compared with our daily lives (where one of us might complain because we can't ride because it's wet, or because Mike V.'s a tool), makes it all too apparent. I'm sorry, that was weak..(what else can we do that we don't already-what are your ideas?) (but yes, Mike V's......) If it were, why then do so many others from around the world leave their home nations and come to live here. Because this country is rich, and the standard of living is high. If you could make 10x what you made in your home country, be protected by a union, and not be treated like a slave, I think that their foreign policy might take a back seat as a deciding factor. Wow -- that's deep. OK,.....close the Manifesto, and get some rest (really)... If you're feeling poorly about your reputation in the rest of the world's view, you're free to leave (unfortunately, if you live in another country, you may not be so free to come back!!) Thanks for the advice. Next time I want some from someone I don't know, I'll be in touch. cc Please don't feel the need to ask.... Goodoz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Tsunami Cyclocross frame with Carbon 'cross fork | Darrell Goodwin | Marketplace | 4 | June 17th 04 06:29 PM |
FS: Tsunami Cyclocross frame with Carbon 'cross fork | Darrell Goodwin | Marketplace | 0 | June 3rd 04 01:02 AM |