Lanids Poll

Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?

2) Do you care?

chester wrote:
Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?

2) Do you care?

"Lanids"

3) can you spell?


Dumbass,

Its "Flandis".

You're welcome.

-bdbafh

chester writes:

Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?

Yes


2) Do you care?

No

--
Davey Crockett

"chester" wrote in message
...
Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?

I'm convinced he is as innocent as all the other main contenders.

2) Do you care?

That the doping hunters spoilt the Tour de France? Yes, I do.

Benjo

benjo maso wrote:
"chester" wrote in message
...
Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?

I'm convinced he is as innocent as all the other main contenders.

Or, are you innocent that the contenders are mainly convinced of their
guilt?

Andre

chester Wrote:
1) Landis guilty?
Yes.
chester Wrote:
2) Do you care?
Yes. If we are going to get a cleaner sport, we have to start
somewhere. I agree he is as guilty as the other main contenders, but we
certainly cannot rely on testing alone to catch all the cheats.

That said, I would like the sportspeople from other sports involved in
the OP debacle (eg football, tennis) to also be named and shamed.


--
patch70

patch70 wrote:

Yes. If we are going to get a cleaner sport, we have to start
somewhere. I agree he is as guilty as the other main contenders, but we
certainly cannot rely on testing alone to catch all the cheats.

This could be read as "let the best cheater win". With heavy collateral
damage.

That said, I would like the sportspeople from other sports involved in
the OP debacle (eg football, tennis) to also be named and shamed.

When rules are made that cannot be fairly and openly enforced, the
"shame" is not with the athletes.

IOW, when the guy next to you can dope to the gills with very, very
little chance of being caught and/or testing positive g, where does
that leave you? Not exactly a "fair" position to be placed in, is it?

The "testers" have painted themselves as a moral force when in fact
they are not. --D-y

"chester" wrote in message
...
Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?
Not as charged.

2) Do you care?
Yes, I would not be here if I didn't. He is a Homeboy done good.

The whole thing does not make sense to me. What would skew the ratio, what
would he take ? Nobody has answered that yet.

" writes:


The "testers" have painted themselves as a moral force when in fact
they are not. --D-y

Since when was a policeman ever moral?

Or honest either for that matter?

Davey, whilst practising his profession has heard the ''Serve and
Protect'' types lie through their teeth under oath on the witness
stand upon several occasions or ''lose'' evidence that might, if
available to the defense, prove exculpatory

--
Davey Crockett

Steve wrote:
"chester" wrote in message
...
Now that the forum is died down mostly, i was curious:

1) Landis guilty?
Not as charged.

2) Do you care?
Yes, I would not be here if I didn't. He is a Homeboy done good.

The whole thing does not make sense to me. What would skew the ratio, what
would he take ? Nobody has answered that yet.



Dumbass -


I'll answer it for you:

Testosterone.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.