The Dilemma of Tom Sherman

On Nov 7, 7:12*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Nov 6, 1:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

It is impossible to become a human being without being immersed in a
society. You will not even have language unless you belong to a society..
Without language you are not a human being. You are just another primate
animal. Read some histories of "wild boys" (children totally isolated from
birth without any human contact) if you can find any. They are very rare
cases, almost nonexistent.

A hermit is as much a member of society as the most social butterfly.
I am familiar with various instances of humans raised in isolation,

but that is much to do about nothing (more about this irrelevance
below).

It is rare alright. It is the one experiment that all sociologists would
love to do, but it is the forbidden experiment. Such an experiment would
show just what is required for a human primate to become a human being.

As for the rest ... UTTER CRAP it is! *First, you cannot be proved

wrong because you are unwilling to admit when you are wrong.
Consequently, by your own logic, you have apparently learned nothing
in quite a long time. *FACT ... by etymological derivation, be it
French (société) or Latin (societas, from sociusu), the very
definition of the word hermit stands in contradiction of your
contention that a hermit is a member of society. * A hermit is one who
has deliberately and consciously has withdrawn from social contact and
society as a whole. * Now, granted (unlike a human raised in
isolation) you were once were immersed in society and learned a
language, but by conscious choice have now since chosen to reject
society and live the secluded live of a recluse disenfranchised from
society. *The only significant difference between a human raised in
isolation and a hermit is that a hermit was not reared in isolation
and chose isolation later in life, voluntarily severing his or her
ties with society.. *In fact a hermit is less a social animal than a
primate in the wild. *Sorry Ed, but you are what you are ... a hermit
and you are what you are .... wrongheaded about this no matter what
spin you put on it. *Enough said.

Poor JimmyMac has not an ounce of understanding of the sciences of sociology
or anthropology. *He probably only took an elementary course in those
subjects whereas I majored in them. I can't be bothered with his education.

On Nov 7, 7:12*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Nov 6, 1:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

It is impossible to become a human being without being immersed in a
society. You will not even have language unless you belong to a society..
Without language you are not a human being. You are just another primate
animal. Read some histories of "wild boys" (children totally isolated from
birth without any human contact) if you can find any. They are very rare
cases, almost nonexistent.

A hermit is as much a member of society as the most social butterfly.
I am familiar with various instances of humans raised in isolation,

but that is much to do about nothing (more about this irrelevance
below).

It is rare alright. It is the one experiment that all sociologists would
love to do, but it is the forbidden experiment. Such an experiment would
show just what is required for a human primate to become a human being.

As for the rest ... UTTER CRAP it is! *First, you cannot be proved

wrong because you are unwilling to admit when you are wrong.
Consequently, by your own logic, you have apparently learned nothing
in quite a long time. *FACT ... by etymological derivation, be it
French (société) or Latin (societas, from sociusu), the very
definition of the word hermit stands in contradiction of your
contention that a hermit is a member of society. * A hermit is one who
has deliberately and consciously has withdrawn from social contact and
society as a whole. * Now, granted (unlike a human raised in
isolation) you were once were immersed in society and learned a
language, but by conscious choice have now since chosen to reject
society and live the secluded live of a recluse disenfranchised from
society. *The only significant difference between a human raised in
isolation and a hermit is that a hermit was not reared in isolation
and chose isolation later in life, voluntarily severing his or her
ties with society.. *In fact a hermit is less a social animal than a
primate in the wild. *Sorry Ed, but you are what you are ... a hermit
and you are what you are .... wrongheaded about this no matter what
spin you put on it. *Enough said.

Poor JimmyMac has not an ounce of understanding of the sciences of sociology
or anthropology. *He probably only took an elementary course in those
subjects whereas I majored in them. I can't be bothered with his education.

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
[...]
If it were not for the computer and the internet, Dolan would not have
anyone to annoy or offend. Let's hope that his PC crashes. That
would mean that Dolan would have to endure social contact in order to
get his PC repaired or replaced ... what a torturous price to pay for
the pitiful, churlish hermit.

I have lived at least 95% of my life without a computer and the Internet. I
guess I could live the remaining 5% the same as before if I had to. Unlike
JimmyMac, I was never stupid enough to think computers were important.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Nov 7, 7:12 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
Poor JimmyMac has not an ounce of understanding of the sciences of
sociology
or anthropology. He probably only took an elementary course in those
subjects whereas I majored in them. I can't be bothered with his
education.
He can either learn it on his own or not.

You may have gone through the motions, but that doesn't mean you
soaked anything in. How could I possible be educated by one so
uneducated? You can babble on all you want about Sociology of which
you seem to know little despite it having been your major. What is
Sociology other than the study of the development, structure, and
function of social institutions, social relationships and collective
behavior of human society? You have deliberately chosen not to have
any social relationships. You have consciously rejected society and
in doing so are no longer a member. Recognize your incoherent,
irrational premise for what it is ... indefensible. Why delude
yourself? Regardless of your preposterous contention to the contrary,
no sensible person will ever accept your errant postulate that a
hermit is a member of society. You are a self-professed, misanthropic
recluse who has embraced the secluded solitude of an insular
lifestyle. Disenfranchised from reality, you are a socially detached
hermit by choice. Internet forums serve as an ersatz social
interaction that only momentarily disrupts your otherwise self-
sequestered isolation. Without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup
audience to sustain you, you have nothing and are nothing. Your
worthless, rehashed, regurgitated posts are a callous waste of
Internet bandwidth, server CPU cycles and archival disk storage.
Fortunately, once your have departed, your monotonous, vitriolic,
scatological harangues will be relegated to the status of cyber-
coprolite!

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry ****head cockup pratting
naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.

JimmyMac illustrates perfectly why a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
It would be better if he had stayed totally ignorant like his peasant
ancestors and never gone to college, even to one so poor as Loyola. You are
either to the manor born or working class. JimmyMac is working class to the
core and should never attempt anything the least bit intellectual. It is
clearly beyond him.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Nov 10, 3:46*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Nov 7, 7:12 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

Poor JimmyMac has not an ounce of understanding of the sciences of
sociology
or anthropology. He probably only took an elementary course in those
subjects whereas I majored in them. I can't be bothered with his
education.
He can either learn it on his own or not.
You may have gone through the motions, but that doesn't mean you

soaked anything in. *How could I possible be educated by one so
uneducated? *You can babble on all you want about Sociology of which
you seem to know little despite it having been your major. * What is
Sociology other than the study of the development, structure, and
function of social institutions, social relationships and collective
behavior of human society? *You have deliberately chosen not to have
any social relationships. *You have consciously rejected society and
in doing so are no longer a member. *Recognize your *incoherent,
irrational premise for what it is ... indefensible. *Why delude
yourself? *Regardless of your preposterous contention to the contrary,
no sensible person will ever accept your errant postulate that a
hermit is a member of society. *You are a self-professed, misanthropic
recluse who has embraced the secluded solitude of an insular
lifestyle. *Disenfranchised from reality, you are a socially detached
hermit by choice. *Internet forums serve as an ersatz social
interaction that only momentarily disrupts your otherwise self-
sequestered isolation. *Without the lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup
audience to sustain you, you have nothing and are nothing. *Your
worthless, rehashed, regurgitated posts are a callous waste of
Internet bandwidth, server CPU cycles and archival disk storage.
Fortunately, once your have departed, your monotonous, vitriolic,
scatological harangues will be relegated to the status of cyber-
coprolite!

You smarmy lagerlout git. *You bloody woofter sod. *Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. *You dankish clack-dish plonker. *You gormless
crook-pated tosser. *You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. *You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. *You craven dewberry ****head cockup pratting
naff. *You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. *You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.

What we have here is Dolan at the end of his rope, having a charisma
malfunction ... throwing a tantrum. The fact is, and Ed know this,
when he is wrong he will not succumb to admission of his error, but
rather will resort to diversion and name calling ... how immature.
When someone is persistent in pressing a point an Ed finds himself
trapped in a corner, this is just his modus operandi. Interestingly
enough, those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom,
authority or intentions are called into question are often the very
same persons who have an inherent inability to establish valid grounds
to discredit others. What we have her is a sterling example at
work.

JimmyMac illustrates perfectly why a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
It would be better if he had stayed totally ignorant like his peasant
ancestors and never gone to college, even to one so poor as Loyola. You are
either to the manor born or working class. JimmyMac is working class to the
core and should never attempt anything the least bit intellectual. It is
clearly beyond him.

AND ... Dolan illustrates that a little knowledge combined with
egocentric, delusional self-indulgence is an even more dangerous
thing. This is an example of typical Dolan wayward gibberish. He
knows nothing of my ancestors, my education or academic rankings of
the school I attended and I'll not debate any of these diversionary
issues with a the hermit Dolan who, need I reiterate, is NOT A MEMBER
OF SOCIETY and whose opinion matters not because he matters not.! As
for being a member of the working class, as I have indicated in the
past, I do not share Ed's warped disdainful perspective regarding the
working class and will not debate this issue with him either having
already done so. Unlike like Ed, prefer not to continue to recycle
the same old grist through the mill ad nauseum. Suffice it to say
however that Dolan himself, who claims not to be a member of the
working class, must have been conceived in the back seat of car with
an automatic transmission which explains why he grew up to be such a
shiftless *******! Oh, and Ed ... you needn't struggle to insult my
intelligence. It is beyond your capacity to do so. For one, you are
not intelligent enough to pull it off and two nothing you have ever
said or ever will say defines who and what I am. When are you going
to master this elementary concept dunderhead?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Nov 10, 3:36*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...] If it were not for the computer and the internet, Dolan would not have

anyone to annoy or offend. *Let's hope that his PC crashes. *That
would mean that Dolan would have to endure social contact in order to
get his PC repaired or replaced ... what a torturous price to pay for
the pitiful, churlish hermit.

I have lived at least 95% of my life without a computer and the Internet.
guess I could live the remaining 5% the same as before if I had to.

T O T A L B U L S H I T !!!!! I challenge you to prove it and pull
the plug. Cant' do it, can you?????

Unlike JimmyMac, I was never stupid enough to think computers were important.

Your entitled to you own stupid opinion.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Nov 10, 3:46 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Nov 7, 7:12 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

Poor JimmyMac has not an ounce of understanding of the sciences of
sociology
or anthropology. He probably only took an elementary course in those
subjects whereas I majored in them. I can't be bothered with his
education.
He can either learn it on his own or not.

You may have gone through the motions ....

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry ****head cockup pratting
naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.

What we have here is Dolan ....

JimmyMac is a stalker - and a dumb one at that. With that goes any and all
credibility. He needs to renew his friendship with Ed Gin. Those two go
together like salt and pepper.

JimmyMac illustrates perfectly why a little knowledge is a dangerous
thing.
It would be better if he had stayed totally ignorant like his peasant
ancestors and never gone to college, even to one so poor as Loyola. You
are
either to the manor born or working class. JimmyMac is working class to
the
core and should never attempt anything the least bit intellectual. It is
clearly beyond him.

AND ... Dolan illustrates ....

JimmyMac stands condemned out of his own mouth. All anyone ever has to do is
read his idiotic posts (but no longer on mine). He is a simple minded
stalker who has no credibility and who is also a monumental bore. JimmyMac
is truly a lost soul - a worthless Chicago asshole and ****head. His wife
will have nothing to do with him and even his two poor old longsuffering
hound dogs have abandoned him. But JimmyMac will never make a good hermit.
He is a dependent type who lives off of others. In other words, a blood
sucking leech!

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Nov 10, 3:36 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]
If it were not for the computer and the internet, Dolan would not have
anyone to annoy or offend ....

I have lived at least 95% of my life without a computer and the Internet.
I guess I could live the remaining 5% the same as before if I had to.

T O T A L B U L S H I T !!!!! I challenge you to prove it and pull
the plug. Cant' do it, can you?????

You first.

Unlike JimmyMac, I was never stupid enough to think computers were
important.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Nov 12, 7:51*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Nov 10, 3:36 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message

....
[...]
If it were not for the computer and the internet, Dolan would not have

anyone to annoy or offend ....



I have lived at least 95% of my life without a computer and the Internet.

On Nov 12, 7:47*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
On Nov 10, 3:46 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:



"JimmyMac" wrote in message

....
On Nov 7, 7:12 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]

Poor JimmyMac has not an ounce of understanding of the sciences of
sociology
or anthropology. He probably only took an elementary course in those
subjects whereas I majored in them. I can't be bothered with his
education.
He can either learn it on his own or not.

You may have gone through the motions ....

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish
foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry ****head cockup pratting
naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted
fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
What we have here is Dolan ....

JimmyMac is a stalker - and a dumb one at that. With that goes any and all
credibility. He needs to renew his friendship with Ed Gin. Those two go
together like salt and pepper.

In his own words ... that would be the stalker Ed Dolan ... I will lie
in wait for him [Tom Sherman] like a cat ready to pounce on a mouse.
There is no one I like to pound on better than Tom Sherman. No one
else is worthy of me. I am just waiting for him to say one wrong word
[on the political situation] and I will go berserk.

JimmyMac illustrates perfectly why a little knowledge is a dangerous
thing.
It would be better if he had stayed totally ignorant like his peasant
ancestors and never gone to college, even to one so poor as Loyola. You
are
either to the manor born or working class. JimmyMac is working class to
the
core and should never attempt anything the least bit intellectual. It is
clearly beyond him.

AND ... Dolan illustrates that a little knowledge combined with
egocentric, delusional self-indulgence is an even more dangerous
thing. This is an example of typical Dolan wayward gibberish. He
knows nothing of my ancestors, my education or academic rankings of
the school I attended and I'll not debate any of these diversionary
issues with a the hermit Dolan who, need I reiterate, is NOT A MEMBER
OF SOCIETY and whose opinion matters not because he matters not.! As
for being a member of the working class, as I have indicated in the
past, I do not share Ed's warped disdainful perspective regarding the
working class and will not debate this issue with him either having
already done so. Unlike like Ed, prefer not to continue to recycle
the same old grist through the mill ad nauseum. Suffice it to say
however that Dolan himself, who claims not to be a member of the
working class, must have been conceived in the back seat of car with
an automatic transmission which explains why he grew up to be such a
shiftless *******! Oh, and Ed ... you needn't struggle to insult my
intelligence. It is beyond your capacity to do so. For one, you are
not intelligent enough to pull it off and two nothing you have ever
said or ever will say defines who and what I am. When are you going
to master this elementary concept dunderhead?

Please note that I added back the remainder of my post to which Dolan
was responding, but callously deleted without so much as the courtesy
of the customary snip notation, but that is par for the course.
This is the same guy who complains whenever someone responds to one of
his posts without quoting it in its entirety, but take the liberty to
break the very rules he expects others to play by. Then again, the
sociopathic Dolan never plays fair.

JimmyMac stands condemned out of his own mouth. All anyone ever has to do is
read his idiotic posts (but no longer on mine). He is a simple minded
stalker who has no credibility and who is also a monumental bore. JimmyMac
is truly a lost soul - a worthless Chicago asshole and ****head. His wife
will have nothing to do with him and even his two poor old longsuffering
hound dogs have abandoned him. But JimmyMac will never make a good hermit..
He is a dependent type who lives off of others. In other words, a blood
sucking leech!

I For what is a hermit but a blood sucking leech who lives off others
and contribute nothing to the very society from which they have
voluntarily cut ties. have no intention of becoming a hermit. My
wife and dogs would not hear of it, nor am I the least bit so
inclined.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota