A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First week



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old January 16th 12, 05:03 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Judith[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,000
Default First week

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:37:04 -0800 (PST), Justin Clewless
wrote:

On 16 jan, 13:54, Judith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:54:57 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:









On 16 jan, 11:30, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:30:47 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:


snip


Dear oh dear - you naughty little porker you.
I do not recognise you as Judge, Jury and Police of this newsgroup.
You want to attempt that which is incorrect? Go ahead.


Incorrect? *In what way?


Are you denying using the posting names of:


Front Mech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie


I have said - you seem to be a bit of a Porker here.


incorrect means wrong


Wrong in what way?

I see that you are not denying using those names.

What a tosser you are.


Let's take your posting in this thread:

and then of course you were actually caught using the email address you had
registered specifically for the purpose of making out that posts were from me


J.M.Messie


It is wrong. I invite you to prove your incorrect assertion.


No,.no. no - I caught you. You then denied it

Oh dear - keep digging. Just because you have already denied it does not mean
that it did not happen.

Let's try again : have you posted using name/address J.M.Messie


It is quite a simple question - I am sure that you can answer it.

Once you start trying to dodge the actual question - and trying to be clever
with your response - it tends to confirm that you are lying in the first place.
Porky Chapman is a dab hand at that - and then being caught out of course

Ads
  #72  
Old January 16th 12, 05:04 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Judith[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,000
Default First week

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:07:33 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:56:56 +0000, Judith
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:47:13 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:04:47 +0000, Judith wrote:



Then perhaps - why you are called Porky?

The use of the passive to try and give some general justification to a
personal opinion is thoroughly despicable.

--
You are Peter Keller MB ChB FANZCA - a silly old sod in his late sixties in New Zealand, and ICMFP
A credit to the Medical Profession - ffs


And you are an anonymous coward.

Guy




Now, now, now Porky - you don't want to go winding me up :-)

  #73  
Old January 16th 12, 05:27 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Just zis Guy, you know?[_33_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,386
Default First week

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:04:32 +0000, Judith
wrote:
You are Peter Keller MB ChB FANZCA - a silly old sod in his late sixties in New Zealand, and ICMFP
A credit to the Medical Profession - ffs


And you are an anonymous coward.


you don't want to go winding me up :-)


As was evident from within an hour of your first arrival, you come
pre-wound.

Guy
--
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
  #74  
Old January 16th 12, 06:12 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,576
Default First week

On 16/01/2012 13:04, The Weasel wrote:

On 16/01/2012 01:21, JNugent wrote:
On 15/01/2012 20:47, dr6092 wrote:
wrote:
spoke mon wrote:


But i'm pleased I got the bike now, it will save me quite a lot of
money and the exercise will be good for me. Also means the wife can
use the car during the week if she wants to.


Most cyclists are apparently rather rich. If you can't at least
afford two cars, are you sure you're ready for membership of the
cycling fraternity?


Not needing to have two is why they're rich.


You've missed the point by a fair margin there.


Ability to afford is highly aligned to desire.


Is it?

I could afford a £5,000 bicycle. Several of them, in fact.

But do I desire one?

What I can afford and the next
man can afford will differ considerably. Most people cannot afford a new
£1000 bike every year.


You are surely wrong. "Most people" see more than that depreciate off the
value of their car every year. Flat screen TVs must be depreciating fast as
well (though not by £1,000 pa). They can afford it. If they couldn't, they
er... wouldn't. The reason they don't buy a £1,000 bike annually is that
[delete as appropriate] (a) they don't want a bike at all (just throwing that
out there for discussion), (b) don't want one that badly or are prepared to
(c) buy one which is cheaper.

I can, but I can’t really afford a second car.


No shame in that. The cost of running a car is more than £1,000 a year.

Whether you can afford a second car is a completely separate issue from
whether you would like one.
  #75  
Old January 16th 12, 06:13 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Justin[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,530
Default First week

On 16 jan, 17:03, Judith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:37:04 -0800 (PST), Justin Clewless









wrote:
On 16 jan, 13:54, Judith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:54:57 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:


On 16 jan, 11:30, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:30:47 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:


snip


Dear oh dear - you naughty little porker you.
I do not recognise you as Judge, Jury and Police of this newsgroup..
You want to attempt that which is incorrect? Go ahead.


Incorrect? *In what way?


Are you denying using the posting names of:


Front Mech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie


I have said - you seem to be a bit of a Porker here.


incorrect means wrong


Wrong in what way?


I see that you are not denying using those names.


What a tosser you are.


Let's take your posting in this thread:


and then of course you were actually caught using the email address *you had
registered specifically for the purpose of making out that posts were from me


J.M.Messie


It is wrong. I invite you to prove your incorrect assertion.


No,.no. no *- I caught you. *You then denied it

Incorrect. Wrong. Did you rebut my denial with conclusive proof?
Oh dear - keep digging. *Just because you have already denied it does not mean
that it did not happen.

I do not have to do anything you ask. I invite you to re-offer your
conclusive proof of your incorrect assertion regarding JM Messie.
Let's try again : have you posted using name/address J.M.Messie


It is quite a simple question - I am sure that you can answer it.

Once you start trying to dodge the actual question - and trying to be clever
with your response - it tends to confirm that you are lying in the first place.
Porky Chapman is a dab hand at that - and then being caught out of course



  #76  
Old January 16th 12, 06:13 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,576
Default First week

On 16/01/2012 15:07, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:56:56 +0000,
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:47:13 +0000 (UTC), Peter
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:04:47 +0000, Judith wrote:



Then perhaps - why you are called Porky?

The use of the passive to try and give some general justification to a
personal opinion is thoroughly despicable.

--
You are Peter Keller MB ChB FANZCA - a silly old sod in his late sixties in New Zealand, and ICMFP
A credit to the Medical Profession - ffs


And you are an anonymous coward.


Didn't you say you knew who she was?
  #77  
Old January 16th 12, 06:26 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
The Weasel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 85
Default First week

On 16/01/2012 17:12, JNugent wrote:
On 16/01/2012 13:04, The Weasel wrote:

On 16/01/2012 01:21, JNugent wrote:
On 15/01/2012 20:47, dr6092 wrote:
wrote:
spoke mon wrote:

But i'm pleased I got the bike now, it will save me quite a lot of
money and the exercise will be good for me. Also means the wife can
use the car during the week if she wants to.


Most cyclists are apparently rather rich. If you can't at least
afford two cars, are you sure you're ready for membership of the
cycling fraternity?


Not needing to have two is why they're rich.


You've missed the point by a fair margin there.


Ability to afford is highly aligned to desire.


Is it?

I could afford a £5,000 bicycle. Several of them, in fact.

But do I desire one?

What I can afford and the next
man can afford will differ considerably. Most people cannot afford a new
£1000 bike every year.


You are surely wrong. "Most people" see more than that depreciate off
the value of their car every year. Flat screen TVs must be depreciating
fast as well (though not by £1,000 pa). They can afford it. If they
couldn't, they er... wouldn't. The reason they don't buy a £1,000 bike
annually is that [delete as appropriate] (a) they don't want a bike at
all (just throwing that out there for discussion), (b) don't want one
that badly or are prepared to (c) buy one which is cheaper.

I can, but I can’t really afford a second car.


No shame in that. The cost of running a car is more than £1,000 a year.

Whether you can afford a second car is a completely separate issue from
whether you would like one.


Disagree, I could actually afford a second car if I wanted one. But the
fact of the matter is that I don’t want one. I do not want the car, and
I do not want the costs that would go with it.

--
The Weasel
  #78  
Old January 16th 12, 06:37 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,576
Default First week

On 16/01/2012 17:26, The Weasel wrote:

On 16/01/2012 17:12, JNugent wrote:
On 16/01/2012 13:04, The Weasel wrote:
On 16/01/2012 01:21, JNugent wrote:
On 15/01/2012 20:47, dr6092 wrote:
wrote:
spoke mon wrote:


But i'm pleased I got the bike now, it will save me quite a lot of
money and the exercise will be good for me. Also means the wife can
use the car during the week if she wants to.


Most cyclists are apparently rather rich. If you can't at least
afford two cars, are you sure you're ready for membership of the
cycling fraternity?


Not needing to have two is why they're rich.


You've missed the point by a fair margin there.


Ability to afford is highly aligned to desire.


Is it?
I could afford a £5,000 bicycle. Several of them, in fact.
But do I desire one?


What I can afford and the next
man can afford will differ considerably. Most people cannot afford a new
£1000 bike every year.


You are surely wrong. "Most people" see more than that depreciate off
the value of their car every year. Flat screen TVs must be depreciating
fast as well (though not by £1,000 pa). They can afford it. If they
couldn't, they er... wouldn't. The reason they don't buy a £1,000 bike
annually is that [delete as appropriate] (a) they don't want a bike at
all (just throwing that out there for discussion), (b) don't want one
that badly or are prepared to (c) buy one which is cheaper.


I can, but I can’t really afford a second car.


No shame in that. The cost of running a car is more than £1,000 a year.
Whether you can afford a second car is a completely separate issue from
whether you would like one.


Disagree, I could actually afford a second car if I wanted one. But the fact
of the matter is that I don’t want one. I do not want the car, and I do not
want the costs that would go with it.


Actually, you've just agreed with me.
  #79  
Old January 16th 12, 08:04 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Judith[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,000
Default First week

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:13:16 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:

On 16 jan, 17:03, Judith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:37:04 -0800 (PST), Justin Clewless









wrote:
On 16 jan, 13:54, Judith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:54:57 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:


On 16 jan, 11:30, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:30:47 -0800 (PST), Justin
wrote:


snip


Dear oh dear - you naughty little porker you.
I do not recognise you as Judge, Jury and Police of this newsgroup.
You want to attempt that which is incorrect? Go ahead.


Incorrect? *In what way?


Are you denying using the posting names of:


Front Mech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie


I have said - you seem to be a bit of a Porker here.


incorrect means wrong


Wrong in what way?


I see that you are not denying using those names.


What a tosser you are.


Let's take your posting in this thread:


and then of course you were actually caught using the email address *you had
registered specifically for the purpose of making out that posts were from me


J.M.Messie


It is wrong. I invite you to prove your incorrect assertion.


No,.no. no *- I caught you. *You then denied it

Incorrect. Wrong. Did you rebut my denial with conclusive proof?



So I say that you denied it.

You say that I am "incorrect" - and I am "wrong" - and yet you then
acknowledge that you made a denial.


Most odd - still we knew that your English was almost as bad as your Dutch.

You have previously posited using the names:

Justin Lewis
Front Mech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie


You have been caught out.

You are a ****wit and a liar.


  #80  
Old January 16th 12, 08:07 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Judith[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,000
Default First week

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:27:42 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:04:32 +0000, Judith
wrote:
You are Peter Keller MB ChB FANZCA - a silly old sod in his late sixties in New Zealand, and ICMFP
A credit to the Medical Profession - ffs


And you are an anonymous coward.


you don't want to go winding me up :-)


As was evident from within an hour of your first arrival, you come
pre-wound.

Guy




Ho, ho ho - how we laughed.


Have you got the precise date for your ****-up?


Oh - sorry - I did of course mean court case.


"Tell me Mr Chapman - is it true that you registered an email address - purely
so that you could abuse the defendant?"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[melb] tips for week in week out dirt crits? dej Australia 5 November 23rd 06 10:39 PM
Helmet week next week on my new Blog & Question about Helmets! 101bike Techniques 8 March 17th 06 07:05 PM
RR: The Same as Last Week Ride-A-Lot Mountain Biking 18 December 22nd 04 01:35 AM
_Rhymes_With_Orange_ (Week of 9-Feb): Is it bike week? Jym Dyer General 0 February 10th 04 05:13 PM
Personal statistic - More miles/week than hours worked/week Peter Fox UK 10 October 1st 03 10:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.