Man hurls abuse and kicks a youngster's cycle

On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 6:02:31 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
On 13/05/2020 16:17, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 3:36:52 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

Not only that but the poor dog could be traumatised. The RSPCA
should investigate why the child was so out of control that she
startled the helpess animal. It's obvious the poor thing wouldn't
understand the father saying "excuse me".

The police are currently investigating the foul language and the
criminal damage to the child's vehicle, not the RSPCA.

Were you investigated when you chucked yourself off that bridge.
"Foul language" try not to be sissy.


Why do you stoop so low by constantly having a dig at Simon when he was
clearly in a depressed state at the time of the incident.
I'm sure he wants to put it all behind him.
Good luck to Simon for the future.
--
Bod

Thanks - I had suffered from a horrible incurable illness for 15 months which was so bad it drove me to make an attempt on my life in 2013. I am OK now.

On 13/05/2020 18:11, Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 6:02:31 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
On 13/05/2020 16:17, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 3:36:52 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

Not only that but the poor dog could be traumatised. The RSPCA
should investigate why the child was so out of control that she
startled the helpess animal. It's obvious the poor thing wouldn't
understand the father saying "excuse me".

The police are currently investigating the foul language and the
criminal damage to the child's vehicle, not the RSPCA.

Were you investigated when you chucked yourself off that bridge.
"Foul language" try not to be sissy.


Why do you stoop so low by constantly having a dig at Simon when he was
clearly in a depressed state at the time of the incident.
I'm sure he wants to put it all behind him.
Good luck to Simon for the future.
--
Bod

Thanks - I had suffered from a horrible incurable illness for 15 months which was so bad it drove me to make an attempt on my life in 2013. I am OK now.

You're welcome, Simon. Good to hear that you are doing well :-)

--
Bod

On 13/05/2020 15:27, JNugent wrote:
On 13/05/2020 13:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/05/2020 12:24, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Arrested"?!
The brat should not have been on the path in the first place, you
know that as well as I do.

"You can walk, jog, bike, cross-country ski or ride horseback on most
trails at Blackwell."

...as long as you stay 2 metres away from everyone else and do not
expose your children to avoidable danger by failing to control them,
particularly in the matters of staying at least 2 metres away from other
people and not running into other people on a bike.

What has this got to do with a correction of Pounders's incorrect fact?

On 20:16 13 May 2020, TMS320 said:
On 13/05/2020 15:27, JNugent wrote:
On 13/05/2020 13:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/05/2020 12:24, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Arrested"?!
The brat should not have been on the path in the first place, you
know that as well as I do.

"You can walk, jog, bike, cross-country ski or ride horseback on most
trails at Blackwell."

...as long as you stay 2 metres away from everyone else and do not
expose your children to avoidable danger by failing to control them,
particularly in the matters of staying at least 2 metres away from other
people and not running into other people on a bike.

What has this got to do with a correction of Pounders's incorrect fact?

You quoted that "You can walk, jog, bike, cross-country ski or ride horseback
on most trails at Blackwell" and Nugent correctly pointed out that a 2 metre
distance was still required for those activities.

It may be Pounder also meant that although it's not entirely clear what he
meant about her not being on the path in the first place.

As the video shows, neither the young girl nor the father kept further than
2m away from the couple. The father let the girl ride into and hit the
couple, then he approached the man closer than the advised 2 metres.

Maybe the police should slap a fine on the father for his breach of the Covid
regulations.

On 13/05/2020 15:28, JNugent wrote:

Some of them go on to make usenet posts in support of law-breaking.

There are also some that make an issue out of other people breaking laws
who won't deny that they break speed limits.

On 13/05/2020 20:46, Pamela wrote:
On 20:16 13 May 2020, TMS320 said:
On 13/05/2020 15:27, JNugent wrote:
On 13/05/2020 13:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/05/2020 12:24, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Arrested"?! The brat should not have been on the path in the
first place, you know that as well as I do.

"You can walk, jog, bike, cross-country ski or ride horseback
on most trails at Blackwell."

...as long as you stay 2 metres away from everyone else and do
not expose your children to avoidable danger by failing to
control them, particularly in the matters of staying at least 2
metres away from other people and not running into other people
on a bike.

What has this got to do with a correction of Pounders's incorrect
fact?

You quoted that "You can walk, jog, bike, cross-country ski or ride
horseback on most trails at Blackwell" and Nugent correctly pointed
out that a 2 metre distance was still required for those activities.

Which does nothing to change the meaning of the word 'can'.

It may be Pounder also meant that although it's not entirely clear
what he meant about her not being on the path in the first place.

I am sure Mr Pounder is capable of speaking for himself.

On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 9:23:14 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:

There are also some that make an issue out of other people breaking laws
who won't deny that they break speed limits.

ALL drivers break the speed limits, no question. But not all cyclists go through red lights - I don't for a start.

I don't do any of these either.

Speeding, parking the wrong way at night, on yellow lines, on zig zags, outside schools, pavement parking, obstructing traffic by inconsiderate parking, driving while drunk, on mobile phones, with no car tax, no licence, no insurance, no MOT, illegal plates, overtaking on double lines, due care, bald tyres, faulty brakes, one eyed monsters, no rear lights, no brake lights, no indicators, fog light abuse, faulty steering, windscreen obscuration, darkly tinted windows, child seat abuse, no seatbelts, insecure load, one way street abuse, amber/red light jumping, cycle box abuse, bus lane abuse, box junction abuse, death by dangerous driving, excess smoke and noise from exhaust, duff suspension, leaking oil, cash for crash fiddles, underage child in front, lights causing glare, over weight limit, ignoring no entry signs, parking without permit, not having control of your vehicle, improper use of horn, using horn at night, no in date photo licence, no licence application after long ban, without prescribed eyewear, failing to stop for police/lollipop/zebra etc

"Bod" wrote in message
...
On 13/05/2020 16:17, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 3:36:52 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

Not only that but the poor dog could be traumatised. The RSPCA
should investigate why the child was so out of control that she
startled the helpess animal. It's obvious the poor thing wouldn't
understand the father saying "excuse me".

The police are currently investigating the foul language and the
criminal damage to the child's vehicle, not the RSPCA.

Were you investigated when you chucked yourself off that bridge.
"Foul language" try not to be sissy.


Why do you stoop so low by constantly having a dig at Simon when he was
clearly in a depressed state at the time of the incident.
I'm sure he wants to put it all behind him.
Good luck to Simon for the future.
--
Bod

On 13/05/2020 18:11, Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 6:02:31 PM UTC+1, Bod wrote:
On 13/05/2020 16:17, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 3:36:52 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

Not only that but the poor dog could be traumatised. The RSPCA
should investigate why the child was so out of control that she
startled the helpess animal. It's obvious the poor thing wouldn't
understand the father saying "excuse me".

The police are currently investigating the foul language and the
criminal damage to the child's vehicle, not the RSPCA.

Were you investigated when you chucked yourself off that bridge.
"Foul language" try not to be sissy.


Why do you stoop so low by constantly having a dig at Simon when he was
clearly in a depressed state at the time of the incident.
I'm sure he wants to put it all behind him.
Good luck to Simon for the future.
--
Bod

Thanks - I had suffered from a horrible incurable illness for 15 months which was so bad it drove me to make an attempt on my life in 2013. I am OK now.

Was the incurable illness cured?

On 13/05/2020 20:16, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/05/2020 15:27, JNugent wrote:
On 13/05/2020 13:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/05/2020 12:24, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Arrested"?!
The brat should not have been on the path in the first place, you
know that as well as I do.

"You can walk, jog, bike, cross-country ski or ride horseback on most
trails at Blackwell."

...as long as you stay 2 metres away from everyone else and do not
expose your children to avoidable danger by failing to control them,
particularly in the matters of staying at least 2 metres away from
other people and not running into other people on a bike.

What has this got to do with a correction of Pounders's incorrect fact?

Your "explanation" was flawed because it did not take account of all the
relevant factors, which I than addes to put your deficient reply into
the correct context.

You might as well say that cyclists are free to pass from Langham Place
Place south into Regent Street, which to an extent, they are - as long
as they are duly courteous to other road users and comply with the
traffic lights at the junction.

You might be allowed to cycle along footpaths (though instinctively,
that doesn't feel correct), but in doing so, you have to avoid running
into pedestrians on your bike and currently, you must observe the rules
on social distancing. That latter is a test of civility as much as
anything else.

Don't be surprised if other people object to, and become upset by, your
putting them in unacceptable and totally unnecessary danger.