|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
Tim McNamara wrote:
Viola! A perfect pre-trip research tool for the route. Zoom in, zoom out, fly around, look at it in 3D. Works great. I hadn't thought of trying that. What a great idea, thanks! Looks like you must have GPS Plus tho.... correct? |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
wrote: "Rick" wrote: 1) Go to the AC website. 2) Download the GPX version of the mapsets. Can you explain to me what the GPX version is and how to download it? GPX is the common GPs eXchange format; most GPS capable software these days can read if not read/write the format. What it is is an XML file in a specific format for GPS information. Tim posted a link to one set of GPS maps. Here is a link to the Transamerica maps: http://www.adventurecycling.org/routes/transamerica.cfm . If you follow that link, in the center of the page is line of links that reads 'overview | gps | buy'. Click on the 'gps' link, agree to the 'contract' and you can download a ZIP file with all the GPS format maps. Unpack the zip, and in each of the twelve directories will be a GPX file for that map segment. - rick |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
Masturbation? Yes, you're enjoying this too much. I'm not Saint Ed, you know. Okay, you piece of one-ply toilet tissue: you can have the last word. It won't make a difference since you've had nothing to say anyway -- nothing informative, and nothing even remotely entertaining. Go **** a tractor trailer's wheels. Any one. Tim McNamara wrote: In article . com, "NYC XYZ" wrote: Tim McNamara wrote: LOL. There was no argument. There is now, of course, since you're just being a prick. Just look up the word "argument" in a dictionary before you argue whether there is an "argument" here, butt-scab. You're engaged in nothing more than polemic masturbation, bub. I pointed out that my experience with touring using the Adventure Cycling maps was different that yours, and I even graciously allowed that my maps are six years old and thus might be printed on different stock that yours. You, providing ample evidence of your inadequate reading comprehension, chose to interpret that as an "argument." Surely you can do better than that. 12 year olds have better repartee. Is that why you can't think of anything better to say, since you're all of eight-and-a-half yourself? You don't have to get the updated information if you don't want to. Outdated info is no use on a map. Data that's ever-changing wastes space. LOL. Are you really a moron or do you just play one on the Internet? Or do you expect them to update and reprint the maps on a monthly basis? I just done tol' ya how I would like the maps done, ****-stain. Shee-it, my state's Department of Transportation doesn't even update its maps annually- just reprints the same maps with a new year on the front. Good for you. Write them a nice letter. Good for me? You really are a dolt. Hell's bells, Pee Wee Herman is less of a ****wit than you. But please, do keep going on, it's very entertaining. What would Bill S. read for laughs without you? I was taught to never try to teach a pig to sing- it's a waste of time and annoys the pig. So I don't write to the President. He'll be gone eventually. Then stop bitching. I'm not the one bitching, dude. Sheesh. If this is a battle wits, you appear to be unarmed. If this were a battle of wits, I'd be arrested for child abuse. Trying to fit in into the map holder on top of my handlebar bag would be impossible. There are bigger map holders. Alternately, the spiral-bound "mapbook" can be made small enough, etc. Sliding it in and out of a pannier pocket with the comb catching on the fabric would be a nuisance. Having to handle all the maps at all times instead of just the section I need for the day would be cumbersome. Who says you couldn't have just the section you need? No, it's pretty simple to orient the map, if necessary, or just to reorient it in my mind. Yes, and it's easy getting up to change the channel -- why did they ever invent the remote? I don't know why you would find that so hard to do. Not hard -- just unnecessary. And it looks amateurish. If they want to resort to panels, then a book-format is better. This also allows for each panel to be bigger, and affords them all the same north-orientation from page to page. The eye can thusmore smoothly follow the route from panel to panel, and the mind more readily imagine the trip and thus contain the whole map for future on-the-fly mental reference. Perhaps for you, with your obviously diminished processing capacity. The other thousands of Adventure Cycling customers don't seem to have a problem with it. That suggests that the problem is yours rather than a problem with the maps. Either your sense of direction or your sense of spatial relations is impaired. Obviously, you have no imagination. We'd never even gotten the wheel were the world full of folks like you ("wheels? I have feet!"), much less the bicycle. LOL. Your best efforts appear to be to try to obfuscate, a sure sign of incomprehension. A bit of imagination is all it takes to use the maps quite efficiently as they are. Your incapacity clearly indicates which one of us is lacking in imagination. But you at least do try to make up for it with delusions of adequacy. I prefer to follow the road. The map is only a reference tool. I am talking about researching the trip beforehand. And a reference tool should be as simple as possible. Flipping around little 2x4 panels (they're even smaller than I'd thought) from one to the other to orient north and then connect it in one's mind with another "differently-oriented" panel should be be at a cut-off from one panel to the next does not sound very "handy" to me. "Doesn't sound very handy?" So you've not actually used them, then? Well, that certainly explains a lot. ROTFL! Hey, you've gotta make a choice. A compact map that takes a slight mental effort on your part to use, or a large map with contiguous routing information. Those are not the only options. As I've outlined already, it can be a book -- the particular dimensions aren't important now, and can always be modified as "field requirements" dictate. More evidence of your daftitude. Adventure Cycling has assumed that their customers have the wits to make use of and appreciate the former. You appear to be an exception. You must be a very stupid man since you're so concerned about intelligence. Truly intelligent people like myself take it as a matter of course, and do not consider it stupidity to improve on existing conditions, however currently feasible. And you're humble, too. How refreshing! And yet you grouse on and on about them. LOL! Since when is responding to you people "grousing on and on"? Oh, I get it, I'm supposed to ignore you morons. Fair enough. I shall. Have a nice life! Don't forget to wear your helmets -- the tighter the better! Why, thank you. I bid you a fond adieu as well. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
On 22 Aug 2006 17:52:59 -0700, "NYC XYZ"
wrote: Masturbation? Yes, you're enjoying this too much. I'm not Saint Ed, you know. Okay, you piece of one-ply toilet tissue: you can have the last word. It won't make a difference since you've had nothing to say anyway -- nothing informative, and nothing even remotely entertaining. Go **** a tractor trailer's wheels. Any one. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 +10dB |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||| ASSHOLE-O-METER |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
On 22 Aug 2006 12:42:52 -0700, "NYC XYZ"
wrote: You're not so bad yourself now. "25 cents, please." 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 +10dB |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||| DOUCHEBAG-O-METER |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
Oh my. Recycling put-downs from '90s-era usenet flame-fests. You're another one who needs some tread-tracks on his head. R Brickston wrote: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 +10dB |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||| DOUCHEBAG-O-METER |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
NYC XYZ wrote:
A: Masturbation? Yes, you're enjoying this too much. Q: When does top-posting make you look like an even bigger moron? |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
On 22 Aug 2006 19:43:59 -0700, "NYC XYZ"
wrote: Oh my. Recycling put-downs from '90s-era usenet flame-fests. You're another one who needs some tread-tracks on his head. As if you would could possibly know, junior. Brrrnnng....!! Brrrnnng....!! Clue Phone.... it's for you, top poster. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Adventure Cycling Maps SUCK!
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:22:11 GMT, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
NYC XYZ wrote: A: Masturbation? Yes, you're enjoying this too much. Q: When does top-posting make you look like an even bigger moron? A: All the time, every time. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bicycle is king of the road as gas costs rise | cfsmtb | Australia | 14 | May 9th 06 12:35 AM |
Factsheet - Cycling to School | Tom Crispin | UK | 179 | April 30th 06 10:18 PM |
Mr. Conflict of Interest Takes Over | B. Lafferty | Racing | 8 | April 15th 06 03:35 AM |
5-day Cycling adventure - So Cal/No. California | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | April 5th 06 02:54 AM |
FAQ | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 27 | September 5th 03 10:58 PM |