Why doesn’t ‘overtaking a cyclist safely’ form part of the driving test?

QUOTE:
Close passes by motorists are as much a part of cycling on British roads as potholes, but there can be only two possible explanations for why a motorist overtakes dangerously close to a cyclist – incompetence or malice. So how best to deal with this scourge of the roads?

Two years ago, there were changes to the practical element of the driving test in Britain. Reversing around corners and three-point-turns were removed, while driving with a sat-nav was introduced and the test duration was extended. It’s right and proper that the test evolves to adapt to the country’s changing roads – given the difficulty that many motorists have in passing a cyclist safely, has the time come for ‘safe overtaking’ to form part of the driving test?

The close pass is something that cyclists of all ages have to contend with. The photograph at the top the page was taken by a coordinator at the Richmond Borough group of London Cycling Campaign when he was out with his 7-year-old daughter. Luckily the dangerous driving did not injure the little girl…or put her off cycling. The cycle cam footage below was taken by an adult cyclist who was close passed by a driver at 50mph.

Rule 163 of the Highway Code states ‘Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
– move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in. Give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car’

In the absence of widespread and good quality infrastructure to protect cyclists from motorised traffic, The Safer Roads Partnership and operational policing teams from both Warwickshire Police and West Mercia Police have pioneered Operation Close Pass – a scheme to reduce the number of cyclists killed or injured on their region’s roads. Close passes are intimidating and nationally account for around a third of all threatening incidents between drivers and cyclists. The initiative, which is now being adopted by other forces, uses plain clothes officers on bikes equipped with front and rear facing cameras. Any driver seen passing closer than the recommended distance (1.5 metres) is pulled over.

https://www.eta.co.uk/2020/02/10/why...-driving-test/

Why doesn't "proceeding safely and lawfully as well as courteously" form
part of the mandatory cycling test?

Oh, hang on...

On Wednesday, 12 February 2020 17:03:53 UTC, JNugent wrote:
Why doesn't "proceeding safely and lawfully as well as courteously" form
part of the mandatory cycling test?

Oh, hang on...

Why do motorists always try and blame cyclists for their wrongdoing?

On 12/02/2020 17:29, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 February 2020 17:03:53 UTC, JNugent wrote:
Why doesn't "proceeding safely and lawfully as well as courteously" form
part of the mandatory cycling test?

Oh, hang on...

Why do motorists always try and blame cyclists for their wrongdoing?

Because cyclists *should* be blamed for their wrongdoing (as indeed,
should anyone else who does wrong)?

On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 5:29:41 PM UTC, Mike Collins wrote:

Why do motorists always try and blame cyclists for their wrongdoing?

It says in the article:
"incompetence or malice."

On 12/02/2020 18:06, Simon Mason wrote:

On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 5:29:41 PM UTC, Mike Collins wrote:

Why do motorists always try and blame cyclists for their wrongdoing?

It says in the article:
"incompetence or malice."

I am please to see you agree that some cyclists are incompetent. And
also that some of them are malicious.

It stands to reason that some mof them are, in fact, incompetent and
malicious.

Thanks for the confirmation.