|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can somebody fill me in on Critical Mass?
It seems clear that there are a variety of opinions regarding the
actions of CM in the US and abroad. Those who have pointed out paralells between CM philosophies and the beliefs and theories of other revolutionary thinkers and groups (Marx, Lenin, etc. etc.) are not wrong to do so. There are also interesting paralells with the civil rights movement in the United States. Public debate surrounding the civil rights movement and its demonstrations featured many of the same issues and questions raised in this forum. Many within the civil rights movement debated these same questions about negative public perception as a result of civil disobedience. There were a number of respected, influential leaders in the black community itself who advocated a more staid, conciliatory approach to winning rights for blacks in the US, eschewing the confrontations at lunch counters and eventually in the streets of the south. Public confrontations with civil rights demonstrators thrust police, local, and eventually federal government into an international spotlight that forced the US and the world to reconsider generations of racist discrimination and abuse. While it is clear across the forty some years since those protests ended that their gains have not yet brought the lasting equality and peaceable relations sought by their leaders, those efforts stand as testament to the hope, faith, and dedication of a generation of Americans to the very ideal that their country was based on: freedom. Although it may strike some as a stretch, many of those cyclists involved in CM see their work as similarly motivated. CM is not an organization; it is a movement. There is no centralized authority, no formal structure to the group. Riders come from a variety of different backgrounds and their views on the meaning of CM and its rides are as different as they are. CM members' beliefs fall along along the sociopolitical spectrum -- from teachers, doctors, and lawyers who commute daily, to couriers who make their living on their bikes, to environmental and community activists who have staked out a claim on the very thing that defines CM: community. CM is not about aggravating drivers, although some drivers can and will become agitated by CM riders. CM is not even about civil disobedience. In fact, there is nothing disobedient about exercising the right to use the road. CM is a community-based movement to reclaim the use of our neighborhood streets and public spaces in a socially-mixed, racially-integrated, economically diverse push to promote safe, environmentally-friendly, sustainable transportation. CM simply put is about re-claiming the purpose of roads: the connection of people to one another. Cyclists who see CM as damaging the interests of the cyclist at large in our cities and on our roads should come out to a CM ride. The invitation is not hostile; it certainly shouldn't be read as a "come and be converted" statement. Rather, come and make a contribution -- change the direction, encourage the behaviors or actions that you see as beneficial, and if you feel strongly then speak up about the things that CM riders have done or are doing that you feel hurt our interests. That is the nature of a movement -- CM relies most basically on those who form its namesake -- the critical mass. -- D. -- Time to make the doughnuts. -------------------------- Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Here's an essay which I can't be bothered to write...
"A Critical Mass gathering is an urban equivalent
of a DDOS attack on a networked computer." Discuss. Tim. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 28/08/03 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Can somebody fill me in on Critical Mass?
"dwj444" wrote in message ... It seems clear that there are a variety of opinions regarding the actions of CM in the US and abroad. Those who have pointed out paralells between CM philosophies and the beliefs and theories of other revolutionary thinkers and groups (Marx, Lenin, etc. etc.) are not wrong to do so. There are also interesting paralells with the civil rights movement in the United States. Public debate surrounding the civil rights movement and its demonstrations featured many of the same issues and questions raised in this forum. Many within the civil rights movement debated these same questions about negative public perception as a result of civil disobedience. There were a number of respected, influential leaders in the black community itself who advocated a more staid, conciliatory approach to winning rights for blacks in the US, eschewing the confrontations at lunch counters and eventually in the streets of the south. Public confrontations with civil rights demonstrators thrust police, local, and eventually federal government into an international spotlight that forced the US and the world to reconsider generations of racist discrimination and abuse. While it is clear across the forty some years since those protests ended that their gains have not yet brought the lasting equality and peaceable relations sought by their leaders, those efforts stand as testament to the hope, faith, and dedication of a generation of Americans to the very ideal that their country was based on: freedom. Although it may strike some as a stretch, many of those cyclists involved in CM see their work as similarly motivated. CM is not an organization; it is a movement. There is no centralized authority, no formal structure to the group. Riders come from a variety of different backgrounds and their views on the meaning of CM and its rides are as different as they are. CM members' beliefs fall along along the sociopolitical spectrum -- from teachers, doctors, and lawyers who commute daily, to couriers who make their living on their bikes, to environmental and community activists who have staked out a claim on the very thing that defines CM: community. CM is not about aggravating drivers, although some drivers can and will become agitated by CM riders. CM is not even about civil disobedience. In fact, there is nothing disobedient about exercising the right to use the road. CM is a community-based movement to reclaim the use of our neighborhood streets and public spaces in a socially-mixed, racially-integrated, economically diverse push to promote safe, environmentally-friendly, sustainable transportation. CM simply put is about re-claiming the purpose of roads: the connection of people to one another. Cyclists who see CM as damaging the interests of the cyclist at large in our cities and on our roads should come out to a CM ride. The invitation is not hostile; it certainly shouldn't be read as a "come and be converted" statement. Rather, come and make a contribution -- change the direction, encourage the behaviors or actions that you see as beneficial, and if you feel strongly then speak up about the things that CM riders have done or are doing that you feel hurt our interests. That is the nature of a movement -- CM relies most basically on those who form its namesake -- the critical mass. -- D. Thank you for this thoughtful essay. It is the most compelling pro-CM argument that I've ever read. However, it does raise some questions: Black Americans in the 1950's were a small minority of the population whose rights were restricted in violation of the US Constitution. Cyclists' rights are not being restricted in violation of the Constitution: They can, and do, share the road with cars. Many/most US states and cities recognize cyclists as legitimate road users, and provide designated safe lanes and/or routes for cyclists. How, then, can you even begin to compare Critical Mass to the Civil Rights Movement? The Civil Rights Movement began without centralized authority or formal organization; but out of it emerged charismatic and inspiring leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King, whose brilliant and emotionally-charged speeches reached across the divide between races of people and stirred popular sentiment in favor of equal civil rights for all races. Again, how does Critical Mass compare? Is there a charismatic leader, or focal point, for the movement that can stir up popular approval and bridge the gap between cyclists and automobile drivers? How will Critical Mass win favorable press coverage if they lack popular approval? I look forward to your comments. -=B=- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Can somebody fill me in on Critical Mass?
Those who have pointed out paralells between CM philosophies
and the beliefs and theories of other revolutionary thinkers and groups (Marx, Lenin, etc. etc.) are not wrong to do so. =v= While I agree that CM is revolutionary (beyond the two revolving wheels per rider, that is), I know of no social theory in which CM is even remotely like Marx and Lenin. Though etc. etc. certainly apply. :^) How, then, can you even begin to compare Critical Mass to the Civil Rights Movement? =v= It's certainly easy enough to find ways that the two don't compare, as you've done. They are not by any means an exact match. There are parallels, though. =v= Bicyclists -- and, more generally, those who don't use cars for transportation -- are treated as second-class citizens in the U.S. Our rights to the road is a nominal legal status, but rarely enforced as it should be. One legal case in Illinois actually ended with the ruling that roads are not intended to accommodate bicyclists, meaning that it's okay for road hazards to injure and kill us. =v= It's pretty much okay for motorists to do so, too. Our deaths are blithely written off as usually our own fault, with few attempts at forensic investigation to determine what actually took place. Our killers are often never charged with anything. =v= The media used to publish death threats against "uppity" minorities, and somtimes the editors or radio announcers would chime in. Today this is wisely considered inappropriate, yet we're seeing no shortage of death threats against bicyclists! =v= You mention certain bike amenities, but these are ample proof that the "separate but equal" approach is anything but. (Which does parallel the reversal of a notorious racial segregation ruling.) =v= CM is like the Civil Rights Movement in another respect: We're just simply exercising our rights to use the road, just like everyone else. And sometimes getting beaten by the cops and attacked by the authorities for it. _Jym_ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks | Zoot Katz | General | 111 | July 20th 04 04:34 PM |
What rights? [was "Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks"] | Mayhem | General | 2 | July 1st 03 06:04 PM |