|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
=====Quote=====
Simon Hughes (Bermondsey and Old Southwark, Liberal Democrat) To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what steps his Department has taken to monitor the implementation of the funding agreement for the grant awarded by his Department to the Royal Borough of Greenwich for the refurbishment of Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels; (2) whether the Royal Borough of Greenwich met the conditions of its contractual agreement with his Department for the refurbishment of the Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels. Hansard source (Citation: HC Deb, 6 November 2012, c544W) Mark Prisk (Hertford and Stortford, Conservative) The original Community Infrastructure Fund 2 agreement for the Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels was signed in November 2008 between the Department and the London borough of Greenwich. The total funding allocation was £11.5 million for the refurbishment of the Greenwich and Woolwich rotunda, tunnels, stairwells and replacements of both lifts, including funding the associated mechanical and electrical works. In December 2008 delivery and monitoring of the grants were then passed to Homes and Communities Agency as DCLG's main delivery body. The agency monitored these grants and were content with progress on the eligible works it funded. The borough confirmed that all eligible works funded by the Homes and Communities Agency were completed as per the conditions of contract and that any remaining works would be funded from their own resources. Responsibility for these grants then passed to the Greater London Authority on 1 April 2012 as part of the wider transfer of the agency's London responsibilities." =====/Quote===== My comment: It seems that responsibility for the oversight of local government expenditure of £11.5m has been passed on from Government to Boris Johnson as part of an April Fool's Joke with cyclists on this part of National Cycle Route One the fall guys. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On 08/11/2012 18:22, Bertie Wooster wrote:
=====Quote===== Simon Hughes (Bermondsey and Old Southwark, Liberal Democrat) To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels; (2) Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels. Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels My comment: It seems that responsibility for the oversight of local government expenditure of £11.5m has been passed on from Government to Boris Johnson as part of an April Fool's Joke with cyclists on this part of National Cycle Route One the fall guys. My comment. Why is a psycholist interested in "foot tunnels"? -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their lives, certainly on a regular basis." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 6:30:48 PM UTC, Dave VOR wrote:
My comment. Why is a psycholist interested in "foot tunnels"? Because you can get off a bike and wheel it through a foot tunnel. Could you really not think of that yourself? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On 09/11/2012 09:04, PhilO wrote:
Dave VOR wrote: My comment. Why is a psycholist interested in "foot tunnels"? Because you can get off a bike and wheel it through a foot tunnel. Could you really not think of that yourself? One could do the same in a sewer. May we also expect a series of questions to be put to the appropriate water company? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On Friday, November 9, 2012 1:06:05 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 09/11/2012 09:04, PhilO wrote: One could do the same in a sewer. Can one legally push a bike through the sewer? Do the authorities put up signs advising you to dismount in a sewer? Or are you being totally irrelevant. Again |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On 09/11/2012 13:27, PhilO wrote:
JNugent wrote: PhilO wrote: In response to PhilO's assertion that a cyclist may psh a bicycle through a foot tunnel... One could do the same in a sewer. Can one legally push a bike through the sewer? Wow... watch those goalposts fly... But I expect that the answer is "yes", despite your attempt at diversion. I have certainly never heard of a law against pushing a bike in a sewer. Have you? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
"JNugent" wrote in message
I have certainly never heard of a law against pushing a bike in a sewer. Perhaps a Mr Angry hasn't gone down so he can come up and complain. "There should be a law against it. One day someone will die" and all that. This is the opportunity for you to do the public spirited thing and spend time down there until you find one. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYFq0Bdftz4 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 01:04:16 -0800 (PST), PhilO wrote:
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 6:30:48 PM UTC, Dave VOR wrote: My comment. Why is a psycholist interested in "foot tunnels"? Because you can get off a bike and wheel it through a foot tunnel. If only they would |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
On 09/11/2012 09:04, PhilO wrote:
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 6:30:48 PM UTC, Dave VOR wrote: My comment. Why is a psycholist interested in "foot tunnels"? Because you can get off a bike and wheel it through a foot tunnel. Could you really not think of that yourself? Except that cyclists cannot be trusted to wheel their silly Victorian diversion - they would ride it instead. -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their lives, certainly on a regular basis." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
A parlimentary question about a hole
PhilO wrote:
On Friday, November 9, 2012 1:06:05 PM UTC, JNugent wrote: On 09/11/2012 09:04, PhilO wrote: One could do the same in a sewer. Can one legally push a bike through the sewer? Do the authorities put up signs advising you to dismount in a sewer? Or are you being totally irrelevant. Again we are talking about Greenwich? -- ennemm |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wheel built and tested 32 hole hub, 24 hole rim. | James[_8_] | Techniques | 25 | October 23rd 13 10:30 PM |
Question - Mavic Open Pro CD rim 32 hole - rear | kwalters | Techniques | 52 | June 30th 07 04:21 AM |
28 hole rim / 36 hole hub stuff | Nate Knutson | Techniques | 13 | January 12th 06 07:13 PM |
Lacing 24" 32 or 36 hole Rim to 48 hole Hub | pdc | Unicycling | 8 | April 5th 05 09:08 PM |
wtb: American Classic Rear road hub 36 hole---will trade for same in 32 hole version | jeremyb | Marketplace | 0 | November 8th 04 04:18 PM |