|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why are bicycles and motorcycles allowed on foot trails in NationalForests??
For obvious reasons of safety, they're not allowed on sidewalks so why
on hiking trails?. As usual in america, it's all about corruption. The mountain bike and motorcycle industries have a lot of financial clout and they buy off the forest service officials and that's that. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why are bicycles and motorcycles allowed on foot trails in National Forests??
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
For obvious reasons of safety, they're not allowed on sidewalks so why on hiking trails?. As usual in america, it's all about corruption. The mountain bike and motorcycle industries have a lot of financial clout and they buy off the forest service officials and that's that. Trails and sidewalks are similar? In my town, they pave the sidewalks. Why'd you leave out horses? What about people walking their dogs? They aren't hiking. Birdwatchers are "hiking" only in the loosest sense of the term. Often, they come to a complete stop for minutes on end, with their eyes glued to some stupid tree. Joggers aren't hiking, either and seldom take in the beauty of the forest. They would only notice a deer if they ran into it. And why not attack cross-country teams that clog up the local trails in the fall with endless training? The massive cross-country coach lobby has obviously corrupted public officials in every high school district in America. Why not troll for everyone while you are at it? There are very few trails in the US that are exclusively for any one use. For example, the average "bike trail" is likely to have more non-bikers on it than bikers (for list of groups, see above -- add skaters if it is a paved trail). This creates more of a political base for bike trails and hiking trails -- or, as they might more properly be known, linear parks. The allowances and restrictions for particular linear park facilities is, indeed, a complex area and one that's difficult to discuss in general terms rather than the specific terms of a particular trail in a particular place with particular soil and drainage conditions (etc.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why are bicycles and motorcycles allowed on foot trails inNationalForests??
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: For obvious reasons of safety, they're not allowed on sidewalks so why Bikes are allowed on sidewalks in many jurisdictions, it depends on whether or not there are large numbers of pedestrians on those sidewalks. When a bicycle is on a sidewalk, its rider must follow the rules of being a pedestrian. on hiking trails?. As usual in america, it's all about corruption. The mountain bike and motorcycle industries have a lot of financial clout and they buy off the forest service officials and that's that. Hikers are allowed on all trails. Why don't you complain about that? It turns out that bikes are allowed only on some hiking trails and motorized two wheel and three wheel vehicles on fewer still. There is signage usually telling you where you aren't allowed to ride. -- "I hate you and I despise you! Now give me back my tail.", Marilyn Monroe, "Bus Stop" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why are bicycles and motorcycles allowed on foot trails in National Forests??
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:36:56 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS wrote: For obvious reasons of safety, they're not allowed on sidewalks so why on hiking trails?. Far less congested than your typical sidewalk. Far less competing noise & other distractions too - so you'll hear them coming. Parks are not JUST for people who prefer to WALK in them. The cyclists are paying taxes on them too. In certain parks it may make sense to banish cycles from one or two of the most-traveled trails, but not a blanket ban. "Peeves the greenies" is NOT a good enough reason for a blanket ban anymore than "Peeves the Bible-Thumpers" is a good enough reason to block the 'Playboy Channel'. As usual in america, it's all about corruption. The mountain bike and motorcycle industries have a lot of financial clout and they buy off the forest service officials and that's that. I suspect the forest service WISHES someone would "buy them". Their budgets are miserable, their salaries are miserable. Sorry, but the REAL issue is one of what "the people" want to do with the land. They're all paying for it, so you've got to balance what all the various interests have in mind. It's called "being fair". Remember "fair" ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pedal grab with front foot or back foot? | skate4flip | Unicycling | 24 | April 10th 06 03:29 AM |
Pedal grab with front foot or back foot? | skate4flip | Unicycling | 0 | January 17th 06 04:00 AM |
rec.bicycles.racing,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.rides | BW | General | 1 | October 18th 03 04:45 PM |
rec.bicycles.racing,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.rides | BW | Rides | 1 | October 18th 03 04:45 PM |
Where do I find the guy with a large right foot and a smaller left foot? | Derk | Techniques | 4 | August 6th 03 05:58 AM |