Cyclist commits offence of 'tampering with a motor vehicle' andboasts about it.

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:19:07 +0100, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...e-car-10611808

That cyclists looks retarded, and probably tried to undertake the caravan. How ****ing stupid can you get? Large vehicles need more room to turn.

--
Bad command or file name! Go stand in the corner.

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:19:07 +0100, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...e-car-10611808

Also pretty stupid to continue trying to pull your caravan when something's clearly jammed. I'd be out checking a wheel hadn't fallen off, or there was a kerb in the way etc.

--
What do you call a cheap circumcision?
A rip off.

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.

You're so vain.You probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.

Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.

Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

Tertiary apology accepted in advance.

On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?

Your name does not appear above, and I certainly have not excised it.

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:05:51 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?


The one Mr Pounder made in response to my most containing the words I cited verbatim.
If you unable to put the posts on this thread in order I suggest getting an adult to help you.

On 16/06/2017 20:16, wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:05:51 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?


The one Mr Pounder made in response to my most containing the words I cited verbatim.
If you unable to put the posts on this thread in order I suggest getting an adult to help you.

There was no mention of you in Mr Pounder's post to which I was responded.

It's all still there above. I have snipped precisely nothing.

It isn't and wasn't all about you.

Have you thought of seeking treatment for your narcissism?

On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:33:07 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 16/06/2017 20:16, wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:05:51 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?


The one Mr Pounder made in response to my most containing the words I cited verbatim.
If you unable to put the posts on this thread in order I suggest getting an adult to help you.

There was no mention of you in Mr Pounder's post to which I was responded.

It's all still there above. I have snipped precisely nothing.

It isn't and wasn't all about you.

Have you thought of seeking treatment for your narcissism?

Apology accepted.
At least you are now mature enough to admit it when you are wrong.
Maybe one day you will be classed as an adult.

On 17/06/2017 01:27, wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:33:07 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 16/06/2017 20:16, wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:05:51 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?


The one Mr Pounder made in response to my most containing the words I cited verbatim.
If you unable to put the posts on this thread in order I suggest getting an adult to help you.

There was no mention of you in Mr Pounder's post to which I was responded.

It's all still there above. I have snipped precisely nothing.

It isn't and wasn't all about you.

Have you thought of seeking treatment for your narcissism?

Apology accepted.
At least you are now mature enough to admit it when you are wrong.
Maybe one day you will be classed as an adult.

I absolutely was not wrong (though you were 100% wrong) and precisely no
apology was or is offered for not acknowledging that you were mentioned
in a post in which you were not mentioned.

It ISN'T all about you, though you obviosusly believe that everything is
about you.

On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 2:17:47 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 17/06/2017 01:27, wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:33:07 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 16/06/2017 20:16, wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:05:51 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?


The one Mr Pounder made in response to my most containing the words I cited verbatim.
If you unable to put the posts on this thread in order I suggest getting an adult to help you.

There was no mention of you in Mr Pounder's post to which I was responded.

It's all still there above. I have snipped precisely nothing.

It isn't and wasn't all about you.

Have you thought of seeking treatment for your narcissism?

Apology accepted.
At least you are now mature enough to admit it when you are wrong.
Maybe one day you will be classed as an adult.

I absolutely was not wrong (though you were 100% wrong) and precisely no
apology was or is offered for not acknowledging that you were mentioned
in a post in which you were not mentioned.

It ISN'T all about you, though you obviosusly believe that everything is
about you.



But you fall for it every time.
I would advise you to take a Chill Pill but Onza did not design them to be taken orally and Aluminium can lead to dementia.

On 17/06/2017 16:11, wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 2:17:47 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 17/06/2017 01:27, wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:33:07 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 16/06/2017 20:16, wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 4:05:51 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 23:31, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 8:33:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 18:49, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 12:38:34 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/06/2017 10:48, Nick wrote:
On 13/06/2017 20:38, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

I refer you to the photo of the cyclist in the report.
Stupid is as stupid looks.
I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself.
Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!!
He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit claiming
scum cyclist.

I'm confused if he already has SIX brats why would he want to "get"
another woman?

This was the poster's initial surmise:

"I bet he lives alone in his one bedroomed council flat, unable to get a
woman and on the dole. Same as yourself."

This is what he was able to glean from a press or online report (and
whiuch can be reasonable assumed to be factual):

Mr pounder's comment was directed at me personally,

There is nothing in the post to even suggest that.
You're so vain.Y ou probably think his post is about you.

how did he glean such incorrect data from the press report?
Apology accepted in advance.

Not from me, since I have said nothing to you or about you and your name
does not appear as a previous poster. There is nothing for which an
apology is your due.

So your comment could not be more misplaced. Well, no more misplaced
than most of your previous ones at least.

"Oh hang on, he works in a fish and chip shop. Hell! A cyclist with a
job?!!! He also claims benefits for his SIX brats. Yip, another benefit
claiming scum cyclist."

As always, happy to help (but really, it was fairly obvious when reading
and correctly understanding the post).

See above.
Double apology accepted in advance.

See above.
Please do not regard yourself as in receipt of an apology from me. You
very much are not.

Which part of 'Same as yourself' in response to my post did you not understand?

What post?


The one Mr Pounder made in response to my most containing the words I cited verbatim.
If you unable to put the posts on this thread in order I suggest getting an adult to help you.

There was no mention of you in Mr Pounder's post to which I was responded.

It's all still there above. I have snipped precisely nothing.

It isn't and wasn't all about you.

Have you thought of seeking treatment for your narcissism?

Apology accepted.
At least you are now mature enough to admit it when you are wrong.
Maybe one day you will be classed as an adult.

I absolutely was not wrong (though you were 100% wrong) and precisely no
apology was or is offered for not acknowledging that you were mentioned
in a post in which you were not mentioned.

It ISN'T all about you, though you obviosusly believe that everything is
about you.



But you fall for it every time.
I would advise you to take a Chill Pill but Onza did not design them to be taken orally and Aluminium can lead to dementia.

Feel free to write as much gibberish as you like (and you do like a lot
of it). It won't make a quote or attibution magically appear in the post
to which I responded.