|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Radial Wheel Building
This will be my first attempt at wheel building I read the Bicycle Wheel and Sheldon Brown's web articles and I think I can do it. I have decided to build a 126 mm rear wheel with 3 cross drive and radial non drive I know the usual practice is to put 8 spokes on one side, then 8 on the other. But in this case it seems like I could put all the Drive side spokes in first then all the radial spokes ? Any tips or comments welcome ! Thanks Larry |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry47Trav wrote: (clip) I could put all the Drive side spokes in first then all the radial spokes ? Any tips or comments welcome ! ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Since the hub is rigid, don't BOTH sides drive? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Leo Lichtman wrote:
"Larry47Trav wrote: (clip) I could put all the Drive side spokes in first then all the radial spokes ? Any tips or comments welcome ! ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Since the hub is rigid, don't BOTH sides drive? It's natural to talk about a drive SIDE and a non drive SIDE. But both sides do drive. You can even put radial spokes on the drive side and 3x on the other. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Great question Leo, to a limited extent this is true, many hubs may to some
extent "drive" both flanges. If you want a little more you can take a peek at The Book (The Bicycle Wheel) and see just how much torque each flange will be transmitting given various configruations and conditions. I think that Larry was refering to the left side of the hub. This is generally the side of the hub that is being driven by the chain and is often refered to as the "drive" side of the hub. Hope this helps. Dave Reckoning "Leo Lichtman" wrote in message ... "Larry47Trav wrote: (clip) I could put all the Drive side spokes in first then all the radial spokes ? Any tips or comments welcome ! ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Since the hub is rigid, don't BOTH sides drive? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Larry47Trav wrote:
This will be my first attempt at wheel building I read the Bicycle Wheel and Sheldon Brown's web articles and I think I can do it. I have decided to build a 126 mm rear wheel with 3 cross drive and radial non drive I know the usual practice is to put 8 spokes on one side, then 8 on the other. But in this case it seems like I could put all the Drive side spokes in first then all the radial spokes ? That's awkward, because it will be hard to get the radial spokes around the right side spokes. When I do this sort of wheel, I first install the 8 or 9 right side trailing spokes, then I drop all of the left side radial spokes into the hub but don't conect them to the rim. I then install the 8 or 9 leading spokes on the right side, while the left spokes are dangling from the rim. Sheldon "DS Is BS" Brown +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | This message has been sent to you using recycled electrons | | exclusively. Please do not discard them after use, | | send them along and help conserve these irreplaceable | | sub-atomic resources for future generations. | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 http://harriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Reckoning" wrote: I think that Larry was refering to the left side of the hub. This is generally the side of the hub that is being driven by the chain and is often refered to as the "drive" side of the hub.(clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I can understand that. However, I believe radial lacing is usually reserved for front wheels, which do not transmit torque. Doesn't radial lacing on one side of the rear wheel take away half of the torque transmission rigidity? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Leo Lichtman writes:
I think that Larry was referring to the left side of the hub. This is generally the side of the hub that is being driven by the chain and is often referred to as the "drive" side of the hub.(clip) I can understand that. However, I believe radial lacing is usually reserved for front wheels, which do not transmit torque. Doesn't radial lacing on one side of the rear wheel take away half of the torque transmission rigidity? The chain is on the right side of the hub and the ability of the left side to drive the wheel depends on how rigid the hub is. In the days when hubs were light and freewheels heavy, the noodle in the center of the hub spool was not strong enough to transmit pedaling torque. The torque transfer depends on the diameter of the hub shaft and is calculated as shown in the Bicycle wheel. Cassette hubs naturally need a larger hub shaft so that the freewheel assembly can be screwed into the shaft to make a "free-hub" or cassette hub. This has made possible the odd spoke arrangements we see today with radial right side spokes. Each manufacturer makes invalid or at least inconsequential claims for these patterns. The prize, in this respect, goes to FSR with three flange hubs. Jobst Brandt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
larry- This will be my first attempt at wheel building
I read the Bicycle Wheel and Sheldon Brown's web articles and I think I can do it. I have decided to build a 126 mm rear wheel with 3 cross drive and radial non drive BRBR Any tips or comments welcome ! BRBR A comment, radial left 'kick stand side' does nothing for the wheel. It does void the warranty on most hubs tho. A tip. Lace 3 cross both sides, true/round/tension/dish and stress relieve well. Build your first wheel in a traditional manner. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wheel building questions | big Pete | Techniques | 18 | October 16th 04 03:14 AM |
Wheelbuilding issues | Nate Knutson | Techniques | 13 | May 9th 04 03:29 PM |