child trailer

Matt Wrote:
Burley seems to be the main internationally available trailer
manufacturer getting mentioned.
There seems to be very little mention of "Chariot carriers" child
trailers (the CTS range) and nothing about the zwei-plus-zwei offering
(Kiddy Van in particular). These are the main ones my local cycle shop
offers on order. Is anyone out there using these who could comment on
their quality/value ?
Of particular interest is speed of folding/unfolding, as we will need
to do this every time we use the trailer (it will sleep in the narrow
hallway with the bike!)
Cheers,
Matt
Chariots Cougar family is the best out there. Suspension. The top
three

Chariot lines are convertable between trailer/stroller/jogger/ski
trailer/backpack.

Their Kid Z Roo line is also impressive-converts between modes without
any assembly.


The Trek trailers are made by Chariot.


--
meb

begin quoting Zippy the Pinhead :
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:59:21 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:
Thge mind boggles. Why would you need a helmet inside a stable
two-wheel trailer in the first place?
I know what your answer will be. I'm not trying to influence YOU to
wear a helmet, but you will proselytize me to repent and cast away my
helmet.

That seems most unlikely, since Guy wears one himself.
--
David Damerell Distortion Field!

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

Thge mind boggles. Why would you need a helmet inside a stable
two-wheel trailer in the first place?

Guy
--

On our first outing with both kids in the trailer (sans helmets), they
bonked their heads together on the first piece of "rough" terrain.
Since then, helmets have been required.

Even with just one child, I can imagine a head bonking a roll-bar if we
were to have a rollover. The probabilities of it happening are low, but
a little extra protection can't hurt. Even with the helmets, the kids
still love to ride in the trailer. My daughter is usually chanting,
"Faster, Daddy, Faster!" And you thought only the extra weight made for
a better workout....

-Buck

Your messages are all as attachments, and can't be read under OE. As a
result, you appear to be posting blank messages. I tried to contact you
privately, but the mail bounced.

Someone else, on a different newsgroup, when alerted to this problem, let us
all know that he felt like it was our tough luck for using a lousy Microsoft
product. I hope your attitude is not the same. After all, the point of
usenet is communication. OE is a widely-used product, even if you don't like
it, or think we should all be using some other newsreader. If you post
things that a large number of people can't read, then it's not just us who
are losing out.


--
Warm Regards,

Claire Petersky
please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply
Home of the meditative cyclist:
http://home.earthlink.net/~cpetersky/Welcome.htm
Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/
See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

Claire Petersky wrote:
Your messages are all as attachments, and can't be read under OE. As a
result, you appear to be posting blank messages. I tried to contact
you privately, but the mail bounced.

Someone else, on a different newsgroup, when alerted to this problem,
let us all know that he felt like it was our tough luck for using a
lousy Microsoft product. I hope your attitude is not the same. After
all, the point of usenet is communication. OE is a widely-used
product, even if you don't like it, or think we should all be using
some other newsreader. If you post things that a large number of
people can't read, then it's not just us who are losing out.

I had assumed he has a virus or worm, as this seemed to start rather
suddenly.

Bill "can you even INJECT penicillin in a mouse?" S.

quoting Bill Sornson :
Claire Petersky wrote:
Your messages are all as attachments, and can't be read under OE.

No, they're not. OE wrongly supposes that they are attachments.

As a
result, you appear to be posting blank messages. I tried to contact
you privately, but the mail bounced.

It's only been deferred with a 4xx response here. Unfortunate that that is
not reported correctly back to you; but it should arrive in due course.

Someone else, on a different newsgroup, when alerted to this problem,
let us all know that he felt like it was our tough luck for using a
lousy Microsoft product. I hope your attitude is not the same.

The vast majority of OE users post mangled articles and don't care about
changing that. Recently this ****ed me off enough that I am returning the
compliment; the difference being that my articles are correctly formed but
their crappy newsreader can't deal with it.

It's unfortunate for the small minority who do make the effort, but they
_are_ a small minority.

I had assumed he has a virus or worm, as this seemed to start rather
suddenly.

Don't be absurd. I don't use Windows for anything except games. It started
suddenly because I decided to do it.
--
David Damerell Distortion Field!

Claire Petersky composed the following ...
Your messages are all as attachments, and can't be read under OE. As a
result, you appear to be posting blank messages. I tried to contact you
privately, but the mail bounced.

Someone else, on a different newsgroup, when alerted to this problem, let
us all know that he felt like it was our tough luck for using a lousy
Microsoft product. I hope your attitude is not the same. After all, the
point of usenet is communication. OE is a widely-used product, even if
you don't like it, or think we should all be using some other newsreader.
If you post things that a large number of people can't read, then it's
not just us who are losing out.

He's just exploiting a difference in the way OE reads articles, in a sort of
"I'm better than you 'cos I don't use OE" way.

If one starts a message with the word begin and two spaces, OE 'sees' it as
an attachment. Many people do this on Usenet to 'pretend' that they have a
virus, again in a holier than thou attitude that makes them look really
cool, hip and trendy in a stupid sort of way.

--
The Caretaker.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:26:18 GMT, "Claire Petersky"
wrote:

Your messages are all as attachments, and can't be read under OE. As a
result, you appear to be posting blank messages. I tried to contact you
privately, but the mail bounced.

Someone else, on a different newsgroup, when alerted to this problem, let us
all know that he felt like it was our tough luck for using a lousy Microsoft
product. I hope your attitude is not the same. After all, the point of
usenet is communication. OE is a widely-used product, even if you don't like
it, or think we should all be using some other newsreader. If you post
things that a large number of people can't read, then it's not just us who
are losing out.

Dear Claire,

Browsing David's posts (including his reply to what you
point out in this thread) suggests that blank posts and
bounced emails convey his normal content and attitude quite
accurately.

So let's not be hasty.

Give David's blank posts another month or two, and see if
they aren't more efficient than his old style.

After all, we already know what David thinks of himself and
what he thinks of everyone else--and those are the main
points of his typical post.

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

David Damerell wrote:
quoting Bill Sornson :

I had assumed he has a virus or worm, as this seemed to start rather
suddenly.

Don't be absurd. I don't use Windows for anything except games. It
started suddenly because I decided to do it.

Well pardon me, Mister Rude. You obviously DO have a bug -- just up your
ass instead of in your computer.

Keep posting that way. No great loss.
--
"Sorry the world just does not work by your white penis ass."
-- Pungent Cloud

The Caretaker ... wrote:
Claire Petersky composed the following ...
Your messages are all as attachments, and can't be read under OE. As
a result, you appear to be posting blank messages. I tried to
contact you privately, but the mail bounced.

Someone else, on a different newsgroup, when alerted to this
problem, let us all know that he felt like it was our tough luck for
using a lousy Microsoft product. I hope your attitude is not the
same. After all, the point of usenet is communication. OE is a
widely-used product, even if you don't like it, or think we should
all be using some other newsreader. If you post things that a large
number of people can't read, then it's not just us who are losing
out.

He's just exploiting a difference in the way OE reads articles, in a
sort of "I'm better than you 'cos I don't use OE" way.

If one starts a message with the word begin and two spaces, OE 'sees'
it as an attachment. Many people do this on Usenet to 'pretend' that
they have a virus, again in a holier than thou attitude that makes
them look really cool, hip and trendy in a stupid sort of way.

He succeeded.
--
BS (no, really)