ON THE LOOP

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/sc...=tacoma&st=cse

On Jul 21, 8:31*am, kolldata wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/sc...?_r=1&scp=1&sq....

the following is legal heavy but there is a trend....
people susceptible will not read it, off course
first and last will do it

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/ma...acy-t2.html?hp

On Jul 21, 8:31*am, kolldata wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/sc...?_r=1&scp=1&sq....

this is stupid:

"Devices fall out of favor, but seldom if ever get abolished by
design. The explosion of the Hindenburg showed the dangers of hydrogen
as a lifting gas and resulted in new emphasis on helium, which is not
flammable, rather than ending the reign of rigid airships."

Rigid airships built after 1937, anyone....?

On Jul 21, 2:15*pm, pm wrote:
On Jul 21, 8:31*am, kolldata wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/sc...?_r=1&scp=1&sq...

this is stupid:

"Devices fall out of favor, but seldom if ever get abolished by
design. The explosion of the Hindenburg showed the dangers of hydrogen
as a lifting gas and resulted in new emphasis on helium, which is not
flammable, rather than ending the reign of rigid airships."

Rigid airships built after 1937, anyone....


The taxed IC over 5 litres is a good example. Swimming pools.
incandescent bulbs are hanging on and the flouro people are
complaining
Newton !

This here subject is my main eco-whining area:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...c=eoa-features
you can now worry abt breathing

available thru email at:

"

pm wrote:
On Jul 21, 8:31 am, kolldata wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/sc...?_r=1&scp=1&sq...

this is stupid:

"Devices fall out of favor, but seldom if ever get abolished by
design. The explosion of the Hindenburg showed the dangers of hydrogen
as a lifting gas and resulted in new emphasis on helium, which is not
flammable, rather than ending the reign of rigid airships."

Rigid airships built after 1937, anyone....?

Sure but the following quote was worth a petty mistake:

"Eric H. Brown, a British engineer who developed aircraft during World
War II and afterward taught at Imperial College London, candidly
described the predicament. In a 1967 book, he called structural
engineering “the art of molding materials we do not really understand
into shapes we cannot really analyze, so as to withstand forces we
cannot really assess, in such a way that the public does not really
suspect.” "

Peter Cole wrote:
pm wrote:
On Jul 21, 8:31 am, kolldata wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/sc...?_r=1&scp=1&sq...

this is stupid:

"Devices fall out of favor, but seldom if ever get abolished by
design. The explosion of the Hindenburg showed the dangers of hydrogen
as a lifting gas and resulted in new emphasis on helium, which is not
flammable, rather than ending the reign of rigid airships."

Rigid airships built after 1937, anyone....?

Sure but the following quote was worth a petty mistake:

"Eric H. Brown, a British engineer who developed aircraft during World
War II and afterward taught at Imperial College London, candidly
described the predicament. In a 1967 book, he called structural
engineering “the art of molding materials we do not really understand
into shapes we cannot really analyze, so as to withstand forces we
cannot really assess, in such a way that the public does not really
suspect.” "

Oh, you mean like this?
http://www.youtube.com/v/l9x2PjozPus..._embedded&fs=1

http://preview.tinyurl.com/248c6qo

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

no like this
#64955

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGkPPyDtWJc


did I see a do over on the BB ?

"Here at Specialized, we hoped the last few days might come down to
something like this"

do tell...

On 7/21/10 4:15 PM, pm wrote:
Rigid airships built after 1937, anyone....?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airship#Modern_use